52 comparisons

Compare LLM models side-by-side

Every comparison below is based on real API benchmarks through LLMWise. We measure speed, quality, cost, and task-specific performance so you can pick the right model for your workload — not the one with the best marketing.

How to choose an LLM: the decision framework

Start with your task

No single model dominates every task. GPT-5.2 excels at code generation and structured output. Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads in nuanced writing and long-form reasoning. Gemini 3 Flash is the fastest for real-time features. DeepSeek V3 offers strong reasoning at a fraction of the cost.

Our best-for rankings show which model wins for coding, writing, math, summarization, and customer support — with real data, not opinions.

Then factor in constraints

After narrowing by task, consider latency requirements (sub-second? batch processing?), cost sensitivity (high-volume APIs vs. occasional queries), and whether you need vision or multimodal input.

If you are unsure, use our comparison guide to build a scoring matrix, or try LLMWise Compare mode — send the same prompt to multiple models and see which performs best on your actual data.

Head-to-head model comparisons

Each comparison covers 8 dimensions: speed, quality, cost, context length, coding, writing, reasoning, and multimodal.

Best LLMs by task

Ranked lists of the top-performing models for specific tasks, scored on real API benchmarks.

Model matchups by task

Focused comparisons of two models for a specific task — coding, writing, math, support, data analysis, or summarization.

GPT-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 for Coding
Head-to-head comparison of GPT-5.2 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 for coding tasks. We te
GPT-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 for Writing
Which AI writes better? We compare GPT-5.2 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 across prose qu
GPT-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 for Math
We compare GPT-5.2 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 on math tasks including reasoning, symb
GPT-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 for Customer Support
Comparing GPT-5.2 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 for customer support: empathy, issue res
GPT-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 for Data Analysis
GPT-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 for data analysis: SQL generation, pattern recognit
GPT-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 for Summarization
Comparing GPT-5.2 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 for summarization: key point extraction,
GPT-5.2 vs Gemini 3 Flash for Coding
GPT-5.2 vs Gemini 3 Flash for coding: code quality, debugging, refactoring, tool
GPT-5.2 vs Gemini 3 Flash for Writing
Head-to-head: GPT-5.2 vs Gemini 3 Flash for writing tasks. We compare prose qual
GPT-5.2 vs Gemini 3 Flash for Math
GPT-5.2 vs Gemini 3 Flash for math: step-by-step reasoning, symbolic math, word
GPT-5.2 vs Gemini 3 Flash for Customer Support
Comparing GPT-5.2 and Gemini 3 Flash for AI customer support: empathy, resolutio
GPT-5.2 vs Gemini 3 Flash for Data Analysis
GPT-5.2 vs Gemini 3 Flash for data analysis: pattern recognition, SQL generation
GPT-5.2 vs Gemini 3 Flash for Summarization
Comparing GPT-5.2 and Gemini 3 Flash for summarization tasks: extraction, brevit
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 3 Flash for Coding
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 3 Flash for coding compared: code quality, debugging
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 3 Flash for Writing
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 3 Flash for writing: prose quality, tone consistency
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 3 Flash for Math
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 3 Flash for math: reasoning, symbolic math, word pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 3 Flash for Customer Support
Claude vs Gemini for customer support: empathy, issue resolution, escalation, ac
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 3 Flash for Data Analysis
Claude vs Gemini for data analysis: pattern recognition, SQL, statistics, data c
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 3 Flash for Summarization
Claude vs Gemini for summarization: key points, brevity, accuracy, structure, an
DeepSeek V3 vs GPT-5.2 for Coding
Compare DeepSeek V3 and GPT-5.2 for coding tasks including code quality, debuggi
DeepSeek V3 vs GPT-5.2 for Writing
Compare DeepSeek V3 and GPT-5.2 for writing tasks including prose quality, tone
DeepSeek V3 vs GPT-5.2 for Math
Compare DeepSeek V3 and GPT-5.2 for math tasks including step-by-step reasoning,
DeepSeek V3 vs GPT-5.2 for Customer Support
Compare DeepSeek V3 and GPT-5.2 for customer support: empathy, issue resolution,
DeepSeek V3 vs GPT-5.2 for Data Analysis
Compare DeepSeek V3 and GPT-5.2 for data analysis: pattern recognition, SQL gene
DeepSeek V3 vs GPT-5.2 for Summarization
Compare DeepSeek V3 and GPT-5.2 for summarization: key point extraction, brevity
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs DeepSeek V3 for Coding
Compare Claude Sonnet 4.5 and DeepSeek V3 for coding tasks. Code quality, debugg
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs DeepSeek V3 for Writing
Compare Claude Sonnet 4.5 and DeepSeek V3 for writing: prose quality, tone, long
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs DeepSeek V3 for Math
Compare Claude Sonnet 4.5 and DeepSeek V3 for math: step-by-step reasoning, symb
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs DeepSeek V3 for Customer Support
Compare Claude Sonnet 4.5 and DeepSeek V3 for customer support: empathy, issue r
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs DeepSeek V3 for Data Analysis
Compare Claude Sonnet 4.5 and DeepSeek V3 for data analysis: pattern recognition
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs DeepSeek V3 for Summarization
Compare Claude Sonnet 4.5 and DeepSeek V3 for summarization: key point extractio
Grok 3 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 for Coding
Compare Grok 3 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 for coding: code quality, debugging, refact
Grok 3 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 for Writing
Compare Grok 3 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 for writing: prose quality, tone consistenc
Grok 3 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 for Math
Compare Grok 3 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 for math: step-by-step reasoning, symbolic
Grok 3 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 for Customer Support
Compare Grok 3 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 for customer support: empathy, issue resolu
Grok 3 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 for Data Analysis
Compare Grok 3 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 for data analysis: pattern recognition, SQL
Grok 3 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 for Summarization
Compare Grok 3 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 for summarization: key point extraction, br

Compare models on your own prompts

LLMWise Compare mode sends the same prompt to up to 9 models simultaneously. See which performs best on your actual data — not synthetic benchmarks.

Start free — 40 credits