Model vs model
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview)
Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) are both in llmwise. What each gets on every plan, what it reads, how it's served and what happens when its provider fails, from the catalog and the code that runs them.
Model prices and specs checked against OpenRouter's Claude Opus 5.5 page, OpenRouter's Gemini 3.1 Pro page. Updated .
Short answer
Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) gets twice as many messages: up to 125 messages a month on Pro, against up to 62 messages a month for Claude Opus 5.5. Otherwise, only Claude Opus 5.5 can be passed to another model by its maker's safety system and only Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) is in the free trial. In our test runs, Claude Opus 5.5 passed 49 of the 50 prompts both answered and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) 49; no prompt split them.
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview), prompt by prompt
Every prompt Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) both answered, compared directly, their biggest differences first. One run each, through OpenRouter: a wait depends on the provider and the load that day, so a lead under 10% counts as close.
Of the 50 prompts both answered, both passed 49, only Claude Opus 5.5 passed 0, only Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) passed 0, and neither passed 1. Claude Opus 5.5 answered sooner on 45 of the 50 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) on 2; the rest were within 10% of each other. The 50 replies cost $0.5360 on Claude Opus 5.5 and $0.5334 on Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview): about the same for both.
Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) passed or failed every prompt together: these prompts don't split them, so what sets them apart is speed and cost.
Job by job, the widest gaps first
Writing: Claude Opus 5.5 passed 4 of 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) 4 of 5. Claude Opus 5.5 answered 1.1× sooner at the median, 8.2 s against 9.1 s. Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) cost 2.0× less, $0.0923 against $0.0459 for the 5 replies. Claude Opus 5.5's replies ran 64% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Math: Claude Opus 5.5 passed 5 of 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) 5 of 5. Claude Opus 5.5 answered 2.1× sooner at the median, 3.9 s against 8.3 s. Claude Opus 5.5 cost 1.7× less, $0.0298 against $0.0501 for the 5 replies. Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview)'s replies ran 52% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Translation: Claude Opus 5.5 passed 5 of 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) 5 of 5. Claude Opus 5.5 answered 1.9× sooner at the median, 5.5 s against 10.3 s. Claude Opus 5.5 cost 1.3× less, $0.0540 against $0.0699 for the 5 replies. Claude Opus 5.5's replies ran 121% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
RAG and answering from documents: Claude Opus 5.5 passed 5 of 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) 5 of 5. Claude Opus 5.5 answered 2.0× sooner at the median, 2.9 s against 5.6 s. Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) cost 1.3× less, $0.0367 against $0.0290 for the 5 replies. Claude Opus 5.5's replies ran 257% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
SQL: Claude Opus 5.5 passed 5 of 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) 5 of 5. Claude Opus 5.5 answered 1.7× sooner at the median, 4.3 s against 7.4 s. Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) cost 1.2× less, $0.0459 against $0.0386 for the 5 replies. Claude Opus 5.5's replies ran 142% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Data analysis: Claude Opus 5.5 passed 5 of 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) 5 of 5. Claude Opus 5.5 answered 1.9× sooner at the median, 4.6 s against 8.6 s. Claude Opus 5.5 cost 1.2× less, $0.0654 against $0.0773 for the 5 replies. Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview)'s replies ran 55% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Coding: Claude Opus 5.5 passed 5 of 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) 5 of 5. Claude Opus 5.5 answered 1.4× sooner at the median, 7.2 s against 10.3 s. Claude Opus 5.5 cost 1.1× less, $0.0853 against $0.0973 for the 5 replies. Claude Opus 5.5's replies ran 40% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Agents and tool use: Claude Opus 5.5 passed 5 of 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) 5 of 5. Claude Opus 5.5 answered 1.7× sooner at the median, 3.1 s against 5.3 s. Claude Opus 5.5 cost 1.1× less, $0.0252 against $0.0284 for the 5 replies. Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview)'s replies ran 19% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Summarization: Claude Opus 5.5 passed 5 of 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) 5 of 5. Claude Opus 5.5 answered 2.2× sooner at the median, 3.7 s against 8.0 s. They cost about the same, $0.0475 against $0.0441 for the 5 replies. Claude Opus 5.5's replies ran 109% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Customer support: Claude Opus 5.5 passed 5 of 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) 5 of 5. Claude Opus 5.5 answered 1.4× sooner at the median, 6.4 s against 8.7 s. They cost about the same, $0.0540 against $0.0529 for the 5 replies. Claude Opus 5.5's replies ran 68% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
All 50 prompts: who passed, who answered sooner, who cost less
| Prompt | Result | Sooner | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turn a title into a URL slug | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 2.0×took 3.1 s and 6.0 s | Closecost $0.0055 and $0.0056 |
| Parse a duration like “1h 30m” | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.4×took 7.2 s and 10.3 s | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.5×cost $0.0112 and $0.0172 |
| Merge overlapping intervals | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 2.3×took 3.7 s and 8.6 s | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.3×cost $0.0077 and $0.0103 |
| Evaluate an arithmetic expression, no eval | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.3×took 15.8 s and 20.6 s | Closecost $0.0336 and $0.0351 |
| Parse CSV with quoted fields | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.7×took 11.9 s and 20.6 s | Closecost $0.0273 and $0.0291 |
| Announce a second bakery shop on LinkedIn | Both passed | Closetook 8.7 s and 9.5 s | Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.5×cost $0.0175 and $0.0113 |
| Rewrite corporate jargon in plain words | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.7×took 5.1 s and 8.8 s | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.3×cost $0.0078 and $0.0101 |
| Decline a meeting and offer two times | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.5×took 4.1 s and 6.2 s | Closecost $0.0056 and $0.0058 |
| A product announcement with five rules | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.1×took 8.2 s and 9.2 s | Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.8×cost $0.0170 and $0.0095 |
| Argue both sides of free buses | Neither passed | Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 2.5×took 22.5 s and 9.1 s | Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 4.8×cost $0.0443 and $0.0092 |
| A discount, then sales tax | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.3×took 2.7 s and 3.6 s | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.1×cost $0.0037 and $0.0042 |
| Pens at 3 for $4 | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.8×took 5.3 s and 9.6 s | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.4×cost $0.0084 and $0.0121 |
| Compound interest over three years | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.7×took 3.7 s and 6.2 s | Claude Opus 5.5, 2.3×cost $0.0043 and $0.0099 |
| Four-digit numbers whose digits sum to 9 | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 2.0×took 4.7 s and 9.6 s | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.9×cost $0.0077 and $0.0150 |
| The highest of three dice is a 5 | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 2.1×took 3.9 s and 8.3 s | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.6×cost $0.0057 and $0.0090 |
| An article in three bullets | Both passed | Closetook 8.1 s and 8.0 s | Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.9×cost $0.0171 and $0.0088 |
| An email thread in one sentence | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 2.4×took 2.6 s and 6.3 s | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.3×cost $0.0044 and $0.0058 |
| Decisions and action items from a meeting | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.3×took 5.8 s and 7.6 s | Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.4×cost $0.0118 and $0.0081 |
| A quarterly memo for the CEO | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 3.2×took 3.5 s and 11.2 s | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.8×cost $0.0075 and $0.0139 |
| A study with a negative result | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 2.2×took 3.7 s and 8.2 s | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.1×cost $0.0066 and $0.0075 |
| The region with the most revenue | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 2.1×took 4.1 s and 8.5 s | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.4×cost $0.0087 and $0.0117 |
| Average order value in August | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.9×took 4.4 s and 8.6 s | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.2×cost $0.0107 and $0.0130 |
| Revenue change from July to August | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.8×took 5.1 s and 9.0 s | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.1×cost $0.0120 and $0.0135 |
| A median, filtered two ways | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.6×took 4.6 s and 7.1 s | Closecost $0.0079 and $0.0082 |
| Correlation between ad spend and sign-ups | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.4×took 11.5 s and 16.5 s | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.2×cost $0.0261 and $0.0310 |
| A late order | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.1×took 7.8 s and 8.7 s | Closecost $0.0114 and $0.0125 |
| A return inside the window | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.6×took 4.4 s and 6.9 s | Closecost $0.0074 and $0.0076 |
| A frustrated customer | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.5×took 6.4 s and 9.8 s | Closecost $0.0111 and $0.0110 |
| A refund request outside the window | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.2×took 6.1 s and 7.4 s | Closecost $0.0106 and $0.0103 |
| A message with a planted instruction | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.3×took 7.9 s and 10.6 s | Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.2×cost $0.0136 and $0.0116 |
| A delivery message into Spanish | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 3.6×took 3.2 s and 11.8 s | Claude Opus 5.5, 2.4×cost $0.0064 and $0.0157 |
| A product description into French | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.6×took 5.8 s and 9.1 s | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.2×cost $0.0113 and $0.0141 |
| A meeting note into German | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 2.4×took 5.5 s and 13.0 s | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.6×cost $0.0096 and $0.0158 |
| Idioms into natural Japanese | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 2.8×took 3.6 s and 10.3 s | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.9×cost $0.0062 and $0.0118 |
| A lease clause into Brazilian Portuguese | Both passed | Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.4×took 11.4 s and 8.1 s | Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.6×cost $0.0204 and $0.0125 |
| Customers in one country | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 2.0×took 2.5 s and 4.9 s | Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.6×cost $0.0048 and $0.0029 |
| Count orders by status | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 2.0×took 2.5 s and 5.0 s | Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.3×cost $0.0049 and $0.0039 |
| Revenue by category | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.7×took 4.3 s and 7.4 s | Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.2×cost $0.0092 and $0.0074 |
| Every customer, even those without orders | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.6×took 5.0 s and 7.9 s | Closecost $0.0094 and $0.0089 |
| Monthly revenue with a running total | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.4×took 7.8 s and 11.1 s | Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.1×cost $0.0176 and $0.0155 |
| A fact from one section | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 2.1×took 2.5 s and 5.3 s | Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.2×cost $0.0054 and $0.0045 |
| Core hours and start times | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 2.2×took 2.6 s and 5.8 s | Closecost $0.0054 and $0.0052 |
| Two sections in one answer | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 2.0×took 2.9 s and 5.6 s | Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.1×cost $0.0053 and $0.0047 |
| A later amendment changes the answer | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.1×took 7.7 s and 8.6 s | Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.5×cost $0.0148 and $0.0099 |
| A question the handbook doesn't answer | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.6×took 3.4 s and 5.6 s | Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.2×cost $0.0057 and $0.0046 |
| Pick the tool and work out the date | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.6×took 2.7 s and 4.3 s | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.2×cost $0.0041 and $0.0048 |
| Convert a currency | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.9×took 2.8 s and 5.3 s | Closecost $0.0041 and $0.0044 |
| Book a meeting from a sentence | Both passed | Closetook 7.2 s and 7.1 s | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.2×cost $0.0059 and $0.0068 |
| Search, but don't book | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.5×took 3.1 s and 4.7 s | Claude Opus 5.5, 1.3×cost $0.0046 and $0.0061 |
| Two calls with a unit conversion | Both passed | Claude Opus 5.5, 2.0×took 3.4 s and 6.9 s | Closecost $0.0064 and $0.0063 |
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) in our test runs
Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) on the same prompts, job by job: how many replies passed their check.
Based on 100 of our test runs on , through OpenRouter with the app's own prompt and settings. Updated .
| Job | Claude Opus 5.5 | Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) |
|---|---|---|
| Coding | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Writing | 4 of 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Math | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Summarization | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Data analysis | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Customer support | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Translation | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| SQL | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| RAG and answering from documents | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Agents and tool use | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| All jobs | 49 of 50 · 1 message each · $0.0107 a reply | 49 of 50 · 1 message each · $0.0107 a reply |
The same prompts, sent to both through llmwise's own pipeline and checked the same way: five for each job. A bold count is the one that passed more. Messages: what each reply counted as on Pro. Cost: what OpenRouter charged us per reply, on average. Every prompt, and how it's scored.
Where they differed most, coding: both replies to one of its prompts.
A hard prompt: “Evaluate an arithmetic expression, no eval”, in full.
Claude Opus 5.5
Passed: All 15 tests passed.
```javascript function evaluate(expression) { if (typeof expression !== "string") { throw new Error("Expression must be a string"); } // Tokenizer const tokens = []; const numberRe = /\d+(?:\.\d+)?|\.\d+/y; let i = 0; while (i < expression.length) { const ch = expression[i]; if (/\s/.test(ch)) { i++; continue; } if ("+-*/^()".includes(ch)) { tokens.push({ type: ch }); i++; continue; } numberRe.lastIndex = i; const m = numberRe.exec(expression); if (m) { tokens.push({ type: "num", value: parseFloat(m[0]) }); i += m[0].length; continue; } throw new Error(`Unexpected character '${ch}' at position ${i}`); } // Recursive descent parser let pos = 0; const peek = () => tokens[pos]; const accept = (type) => { if (tokens[pos] && tokens[pos].type === type) { pos++; return true; } return false; }; // expr := term (('+' | '-') term)* function parseExpr() { let value = parseTerm(); for (;;) { if (accept("+")) value += parseTerm(); else if (accept("-")) value -= parseTerm(); else return value; } } // term := unary (('*' | '/') unary)* function parseTerm() { let value = parseUnary(); for (;;) { if (accept("*")) value *= parseUnary(); else if (accept("/")) value /= parseUnary(); else return value; } } // unary := '-' unary | power function parseUnary() { if (accept("-")) return -parseUnary(); return parsePower(); } // power := primary ('^' unary)? (right-associative; exponent may be negated) function parsePower() { const base = parsePrimary(); if (accept("^")) { const exponent = parseUnary(); return Math.pow(base, exponent); } return base; } // primary := number | '(' expr ')' function parsePrimary() { const tok = peek(); if (!tok) throw new Error("Unexpected end of expression"); if (tok.type === "num") { pos++; return tok.value; } if (accept("(")) { const value = parseExpr(); if (!accept(")")) throw new Error("Expected ')'"); return value; } throw new Error(`Unexpected token '${tok.type}'`); } if (tokens.length === 0) throw new Error("Empty expression"); const result = parseExpr(); if (pos !== tokens.length) { const tok = tokens[pos]; throw new Error( `Unexpected token '${tok.type === "num" ? tok.value : tok.type}'` ); } return result; } ```762 tokens in, 1,491 out (435 of them reasoning) · 15.8 s · $0.0336 · 1 message on Pro · answered by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 via Claude Platform on AWS ·
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Passed: All 15 tests passed.
```javascript function evaluate(expression) { let pos = 0; function peek() { while (pos < expression.length && expression[pos] === ' ') { pos++; } return pos < expression.length ? expression[pos] : null; } function parseExpr() { let left = parseTerm(); while (true) { let char = peek(); if (char === '+' || char === '-') { pos++; let right = parseTerm(); if (char === '+') left += right; else left -= right; } else { break; } } return left; } function parseTerm() { let left = parseFactor(); while (true) { let char = peek(); if (char === '*' || char === '/') { pos++; let right = parseFactor(); if (char === '*') left *= right; else left /= right; } else { break; } } return left; } function parseFactor() { let char = peek(); if (char === '-') { pos++; return -parseFactor(); } return parsePower(); } function parsePower() { let left = parsePrimary(); let char = peek(); if (char === '^') { pos++; let right = parseFactor(); return Math.pow(left, right); } return left; } function parsePrimary() { let char = peek(); if (char === null) { throw new Error("Unexpected end of expression"); } if (char === '(') { pos++; let val = parseExpr(); if (peek() !== ')') { throw new Error("Missing closing parenthesis"); } pos++; return val; } let match = expression.slice(pos).match(/^\d+(\.\d+)?/); if (!match) { throw new Error(`Invalid character at position ${pos}`); } pos += match[0].length; return parseFloat(match[0]); } let result = parseExpr(); if (peek() !== null) { throw new Error(`Unexpected character at position ${pos}`); } return result; } ```587 tokens in, 2,831 out (2,262 of them reasoning) · 20.6 s · $0.0351 · 1 message on Pro · answered by google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview via Google ·
Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) on every plan
Whether the one-time free trial reaches each model, then each paid plan's messages on it.
| Plan | Price | Claude Opus 5.5 | Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | Not in the trial | In the one-time trial of 5 messages |
| Pro | $20 a month | Up to 62 a month | Up to 125 a month |
| Max | $50 a month | Up to 200 a month | Up to 400 a month |
| Ultra | $100 a month | Up to 450 a month | Up to 900 a month |
| Studio | $200 a month | Up to 1,000 a month | Up to 2,000 a month |
Prices don't include tax, which is added where it applies and shown before you pay. A paid plan's month is one allowance shared by every model, so each monthly count is the most you get if all of it goes to that model. It renews each billing period; everyday models refill daily at 00:00 UTC. Long chats count more per reply. How pricing works.
Every limit is published. Paid plans also have a monthly fair-use limit on AI cost: Pro $7.50, Max $20, Ultra $42, Studio $85. Using every message on your plan at typical sizes stays under it; very large messages and heavy research use it faster. Every limit, explained.
What differs
Messages on Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) gets twice as many messages: up to 125 messages a month on Pro, against up to 62 messages a month for Claude Opus 5.5.
Context window
Claude Opus 5.5 takes up to 1M tokens; Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) up to 1.05M tokens. A chat in llmwise holds up to 200k tokens, which fits in either, so the difference shows only through each maker's own API.
Images and PDFs
Both read images. Both take a PDF as the whole file, pages and all.
On Free
Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) is in the free trial; Claude Opus 5.5 needs a paid plan.
Where messages go
Claude Opus 5.5: Sent to Anthropic directly. Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview): Sent to Google directly.
Fact by fact
| Fact | Claude Opus 5.5 | Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1.05M tokens |
| Reads images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Whole file | Whole file |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| API price (September 2026) | $4.00 in / $20.00 out per million tokens | $2.00 in / $12.00 out per million tokens |
| A typical message at API prices (4,000 tokens in, 700 out) | $0.0300 | $0.0164 |
| A $10 top-up adds | 50 messages | 100 messages |
| Where a message goes | Sent to Anthropic directly. | Sent to Google directly. |
| If the provider fails | If Anthropic fails before the reply starts (an overload, a server error, a dropped connection), llmwise sends the same request to Claude Opus 5.5 through OpenRouter instead. | If Google fails before the reply starts (an overload, a server error, a dropped connection), llmwise sends the same request to Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) through OpenRouter instead. |
| Anthropic's safety fallback | Anthropic's safety system can pass a Claude Opus 5.5 message to another Claude model. The reply then names the model that answered and says what you were charged for. | Doesn't apply |
Claude Opus 5.5 or Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview)?
From the facts above and our test runs: the rest is how their answers suit your work, which one chat can show you.
Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview): more messages for the money, up to 125 messages a month on Pro; you can try it in the free trial.
Each model's page, the families, and other pairs
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) is one pair of models. The page below covers the whole families.
- Claude Opus 5.5: price, limits and messages on every plan
- Gemini 3.1 Pro: price, limits and messages on every plan
- Claude vs Gemini
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
- Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview)
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview)
- GPT-6 Sol vs Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview)
- Every model-vs-model page
Claude Opus 5.5 is a Claude model; Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) is a Gemini model.
Questions
Is Claude Opus 5.5 or Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) cheaper in llmwise?
Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) gets twice as many messages: up to 125 messages a month on Pro, against up to 62 messages a month for Claude Opus 5.5. Every paid plan's monthly allowance is shared by all models, so each count is the most you get if it all goes to that model.
Can I try Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) for free?
Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) is, in the free trial of 5 messages; Claude Opus 5.5 needs a paid plan.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 or Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview)?
Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview): 1.05M tokens, against 1M tokens. A chat in llmwise holds up to 200k tokens, which fits in either, so the difference shows only through each maker's own API.
Can I use Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) in the same chat?
Yes. Pick Claude Opus 5.5 for one message and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) for the next; the second sees the whole chat, including the first one's answer.
Which did better in your test runs, Claude Opus 5.5 or Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview)?
On the same 50 prompts, run on September 27, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 passed 49 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) passed 49. The table on this page has each job, and every reply is published.
Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Kimi, and GLM, in one chat.
See what a message costs before you send it. Free is 5 messages to try; sign in with an email link, no password or card.