Skip to content

Model vs model

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview)

Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) are both in llmwise. What each gets on every plan, what it reads, how it's served and what happens when its provider fails, from the catalog and the code that runs them.

Model prices and specs checked against OpenRouter's Claude Opus 5.5 page, OpenRouter's Gemini 3.1 Pro page. Updated .

Short answer

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) gets twice as many messages: up to 125 messages a month on Pro, against up to 62 messages a month for Claude Opus 5.5. Otherwise, only Claude Opus 5.5 can be passed to another model by its maker's safety system and only Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) is in the free trial. In our test runs, Claude Opus 5.5 passed 49 of the 50 prompts both answered and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) 49; no prompt split them.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview), prompt by prompt

Every prompt Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) both answered, compared directly, their biggest differences first. One run each, through OpenRouter: a wait depends on the provider and the load that day, so a lead under 10% counts as close.

Of the 50 prompts both answered, both passed 49, only Claude Opus 5.5 passed 0, only Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) passed 0, and neither passed 1. Claude Opus 5.5 answered sooner on 45 of the 50 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) on 2; the rest were within 10% of each other. The 50 replies cost $0.5360 on Claude Opus 5.5 and $0.5334 on Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview): about the same for both.

Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) passed or failed every prompt together: these prompts don't split them, so what sets them apart is speed and cost.

Job by job, the widest gaps first

  • Writing: Claude Opus 5.5 passed 4 of 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) 4 of 5. Claude Opus 5.5 answered 1.1× sooner at the median, 8.2 s against 9.1 s. Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) cost 2.0× less, $0.0923 against $0.0459 for the 5 replies. Claude Opus 5.5's replies ran 64% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.

  • Math: Claude Opus 5.5 passed 5 of 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) 5 of 5. Claude Opus 5.5 answered 2.1× sooner at the median, 3.9 s against 8.3 s. Claude Opus 5.5 cost 1.7× less, $0.0298 against $0.0501 for the 5 replies. Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview)'s replies ran 52% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.

  • Translation: Claude Opus 5.5 passed 5 of 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) 5 of 5. Claude Opus 5.5 answered 1.9× sooner at the median, 5.5 s against 10.3 s. Claude Opus 5.5 cost 1.3× less, $0.0540 against $0.0699 for the 5 replies. Claude Opus 5.5's replies ran 121% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.

  • RAG and answering from documents: Claude Opus 5.5 passed 5 of 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) 5 of 5. Claude Opus 5.5 answered 2.0× sooner at the median, 2.9 s against 5.6 s. Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) cost 1.3× less, $0.0367 against $0.0290 for the 5 replies. Claude Opus 5.5's replies ran 257% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.

  • SQL: Claude Opus 5.5 passed 5 of 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) 5 of 5. Claude Opus 5.5 answered 1.7× sooner at the median, 4.3 s against 7.4 s. Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) cost 1.2× less, $0.0459 against $0.0386 for the 5 replies. Claude Opus 5.5's replies ran 142% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.

  • Data analysis: Claude Opus 5.5 passed 5 of 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) 5 of 5. Claude Opus 5.5 answered 1.9× sooner at the median, 4.6 s against 8.6 s. Claude Opus 5.5 cost 1.2× less, $0.0654 against $0.0773 for the 5 replies. Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview)'s replies ran 55% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.

  • Coding: Claude Opus 5.5 passed 5 of 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) 5 of 5. Claude Opus 5.5 answered 1.4× sooner at the median, 7.2 s against 10.3 s. Claude Opus 5.5 cost 1.1× less, $0.0853 against $0.0973 for the 5 replies. Claude Opus 5.5's replies ran 40% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.

  • Agents and tool use: Claude Opus 5.5 passed 5 of 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) 5 of 5. Claude Opus 5.5 answered 1.7× sooner at the median, 3.1 s against 5.3 s. Claude Opus 5.5 cost 1.1× less, $0.0252 against $0.0284 for the 5 replies. Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview)'s replies ran 19% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.

  • Summarization: Claude Opus 5.5 passed 5 of 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) 5 of 5. Claude Opus 5.5 answered 2.2× sooner at the median, 3.7 s against 8.0 s. They cost about the same, $0.0475 against $0.0441 for the 5 replies. Claude Opus 5.5's replies ran 109% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.

  • Customer support: Claude Opus 5.5 passed 5 of 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) 5 of 5. Claude Opus 5.5 answered 1.4× sooner at the median, 6.4 s against 8.7 s. They cost about the same, $0.0540 against $0.0529 for the 5 replies. Claude Opus 5.5's replies ran 68% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.

All 50 prompts: who passed, who answered sooner, who cost less
Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) on each prompt of our test runs
PromptResultSoonerCheaper
Turn a title into a URL slugBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 2.0×took 3.1 s and 6.0 sClosecost $0.0055 and $0.0056
Parse a duration like “1h 30m”Both passedClaude Opus 5.5, 1.4×took 7.2 s and 10.3 sClaude Opus 5.5, 1.5×cost $0.0112 and $0.0172
Merge overlapping intervalsBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 2.3×took 3.7 s and 8.6 sClaude Opus 5.5, 1.3×cost $0.0077 and $0.0103
Evaluate an arithmetic expression, no evalBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 1.3×took 15.8 s and 20.6 sClosecost $0.0336 and $0.0351
Parse CSV with quoted fieldsBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 1.7×took 11.9 s and 20.6 sClosecost $0.0273 and $0.0291
Announce a second bakery shop on LinkedInBoth passedClosetook 8.7 s and 9.5 sGemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.5×cost $0.0175 and $0.0113
Rewrite corporate jargon in plain wordsBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 1.7×took 5.1 s and 8.8 sClaude Opus 5.5, 1.3×cost $0.0078 and $0.0101
Decline a meeting and offer two timesBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 1.5×took 4.1 s and 6.2 sClosecost $0.0056 and $0.0058
A product announcement with five rulesBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 1.1×took 8.2 s and 9.2 sGemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.8×cost $0.0170 and $0.0095
Argue both sides of free busesNeither passedGemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 2.5×took 22.5 s and 9.1 sGemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 4.8×cost $0.0443 and $0.0092
A discount, then sales taxBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 1.3×took 2.7 s and 3.6 sClaude Opus 5.5, 1.1×cost $0.0037 and $0.0042
Pens at 3 for $4Both passedClaude Opus 5.5, 1.8×took 5.3 s and 9.6 sClaude Opus 5.5, 1.4×cost $0.0084 and $0.0121
Compound interest over three yearsBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 1.7×took 3.7 s and 6.2 sClaude Opus 5.5, 2.3×cost $0.0043 and $0.0099
Four-digit numbers whose digits sum to 9Both passedClaude Opus 5.5, 2.0×took 4.7 s and 9.6 sClaude Opus 5.5, 1.9×cost $0.0077 and $0.0150
The highest of three dice is a 5Both passedClaude Opus 5.5, 2.1×took 3.9 s and 8.3 sClaude Opus 5.5, 1.6×cost $0.0057 and $0.0090
An article in three bulletsBoth passedClosetook 8.1 s and 8.0 sGemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.9×cost $0.0171 and $0.0088
An email thread in one sentenceBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 2.4×took 2.6 s and 6.3 sClaude Opus 5.5, 1.3×cost $0.0044 and $0.0058
Decisions and action items from a meetingBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 1.3×took 5.8 s and 7.6 sGemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.4×cost $0.0118 and $0.0081
A quarterly memo for the CEOBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 3.2×took 3.5 s and 11.2 sClaude Opus 5.5, 1.8×cost $0.0075 and $0.0139
A study with a negative resultBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 2.2×took 3.7 s and 8.2 sClaude Opus 5.5, 1.1×cost $0.0066 and $0.0075
The region with the most revenueBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 2.1×took 4.1 s and 8.5 sClaude Opus 5.5, 1.4×cost $0.0087 and $0.0117
Average order value in AugustBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 1.9×took 4.4 s and 8.6 sClaude Opus 5.5, 1.2×cost $0.0107 and $0.0130
Revenue change from July to AugustBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 1.8×took 5.1 s and 9.0 sClaude Opus 5.5, 1.1×cost $0.0120 and $0.0135
A median, filtered two waysBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 1.6×took 4.6 s and 7.1 sClosecost $0.0079 and $0.0082
Correlation between ad spend and sign-upsBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 1.4×took 11.5 s and 16.5 sClaude Opus 5.5, 1.2×cost $0.0261 and $0.0310
A late orderBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 1.1×took 7.8 s and 8.7 sClosecost $0.0114 and $0.0125
A return inside the windowBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 1.6×took 4.4 s and 6.9 sClosecost $0.0074 and $0.0076
A frustrated customerBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 1.5×took 6.4 s and 9.8 sClosecost $0.0111 and $0.0110
A refund request outside the windowBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 1.2×took 6.1 s and 7.4 sClosecost $0.0106 and $0.0103
A message with a planted instructionBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 1.3×took 7.9 s and 10.6 sGemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.2×cost $0.0136 and $0.0116
A delivery message into SpanishBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 3.6×took 3.2 s and 11.8 sClaude Opus 5.5, 2.4×cost $0.0064 and $0.0157
A product description into FrenchBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 1.6×took 5.8 s and 9.1 sClaude Opus 5.5, 1.2×cost $0.0113 and $0.0141
A meeting note into GermanBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 2.4×took 5.5 s and 13.0 sClaude Opus 5.5, 1.6×cost $0.0096 and $0.0158
Idioms into natural JapaneseBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 2.8×took 3.6 s and 10.3 sClaude Opus 5.5, 1.9×cost $0.0062 and $0.0118
A lease clause into Brazilian PortugueseBoth passedGemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.4×took 11.4 s and 8.1 sGemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.6×cost $0.0204 and $0.0125
Customers in one countryBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 2.0×took 2.5 s and 4.9 sGemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.6×cost $0.0048 and $0.0029
Count orders by statusBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 2.0×took 2.5 s and 5.0 sGemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.3×cost $0.0049 and $0.0039
Revenue by categoryBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 1.7×took 4.3 s and 7.4 sGemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.2×cost $0.0092 and $0.0074
Every customer, even those without ordersBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 1.6×took 5.0 s and 7.9 sClosecost $0.0094 and $0.0089
Monthly revenue with a running totalBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 1.4×took 7.8 s and 11.1 sGemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.1×cost $0.0176 and $0.0155
A fact from one sectionBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 2.1×took 2.5 s and 5.3 sGemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.2×cost $0.0054 and $0.0045
Core hours and start timesBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 2.2×took 2.6 s and 5.8 sClosecost $0.0054 and $0.0052
Two sections in one answerBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 2.0×took 2.9 s and 5.6 sGemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.1×cost $0.0053 and $0.0047
A later amendment changes the answerBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 1.1×took 7.7 s and 8.6 sGemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.5×cost $0.0148 and $0.0099
A question the handbook doesn't answerBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 1.6×took 3.4 s and 5.6 sGemini 3.1 Pro (preview), 1.2×cost $0.0057 and $0.0046
Pick the tool and work out the dateBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 1.6×took 2.7 s and 4.3 sClaude Opus 5.5, 1.2×cost $0.0041 and $0.0048
Convert a currencyBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 1.9×took 2.8 s and 5.3 sClosecost $0.0041 and $0.0044
Book a meeting from a sentenceBoth passedClosetook 7.2 s and 7.1 sClaude Opus 5.5, 1.2×cost $0.0059 and $0.0068
Search, but don't bookBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 1.5×took 3.1 s and 4.7 sClaude Opus 5.5, 1.3×cost $0.0046 and $0.0061
Two calls with a unit conversionBoth passedClaude Opus 5.5, 2.0×took 3.4 s and 6.9 sClosecost $0.0064 and $0.0063

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) in our test runs

Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) on the same prompts, job by job: how many replies passed their check.

Based on 100 of our test runs on , through OpenRouter with the app's own prompt and settings. Updated .

Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) in our test runs, job by job
JobClaude Opus 5.5Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview)
Coding5 of 55 of 5
Writing4 of 54 of 5
Math5 of 55 of 5
Summarization5 of 55 of 5
Data analysis5 of 55 of 5
Customer support5 of 55 of 5
Translation5 of 55 of 5
SQL5 of 55 of 5
RAG and answering from documents5 of 55 of 5
Agents and tool use5 of 55 of 5
All jobs49 of 50 · 1 message each · $0.0107 a reply49 of 50 · 1 message each · $0.0107 a reply

The same prompts, sent to both through llmwise's own pipeline and checked the same way: five for each job. A bold count is the one that passed more. Messages: what each reply counted as on Pro. Cost: what OpenRouter charged us per reply, on average. Every prompt, and how it's scored.

Where they differed most, coding: both replies to one of its prompts.

A hard prompt: “Evaluate an arithmetic expression, no eval”, in full.

  • Claude Opus 5.5

    Passed: All 15 tests passed.

    ```javascript
    function evaluate(expression) {
      if (typeof expression !== "string") {
        throw new Error("Expression must be a string");
      }
    
      // Tokenizer
      const tokens = [];
      const numberRe = /\d+(?:\.\d+)?|\.\d+/y;
      let i = 0;
      while (i < expression.length) {
        const ch = expression[i];
        if (/\s/.test(ch)) {
          i++;
          continue;
        }
        if ("+-*/^()".includes(ch)) {
          tokens.push({ type: ch });
          i++;
          continue;
        }
        numberRe.lastIndex = i;
        const m = numberRe.exec(expression);
        if (m) {
          tokens.push({ type: "num", value: parseFloat(m[0]) });
          i += m[0].length;
          continue;
        }
        throw new Error(`Unexpected character '${ch}' at position ${i}`);
      }
    
      // Recursive descent parser
      let pos = 0;
      const peek = () => tokens[pos];
      const accept = (type) => {
        if (tokens[pos] && tokens[pos].type === type) {
          pos++;
          return true;
        }
        return false;
      };
    
      // expr := term (('+' | '-') term)*
      function parseExpr() {
        let value = parseTerm();
        for (;;) {
          if (accept("+")) value += parseTerm();
          else if (accept("-")) value -= parseTerm();
          else return value;
        }
      }
    
      // term := unary (('*' | '/') unary)*
      function parseTerm() {
        let value = parseUnary();
        for (;;) {
          if (accept("*")) value *= parseUnary();
          else if (accept("/")) value /= parseUnary();
          else return value;
        }
      }
    
      // unary := '-' unary | power
      function parseUnary() {
        if (accept("-")) return -parseUnary();
        return parsePower();
      }
    
      // power := primary ('^' unary)?   (right-associative; exponent may be negated)
      function parsePower() {
        const base = parsePrimary();
        if (accept("^")) {
          const exponent = parseUnary();
          return Math.pow(base, exponent);
        }
        return base;
      }
    
      // primary := number | '(' expr ')'
      function parsePrimary() {
        const tok = peek();
        if (!tok) throw new Error("Unexpected end of expression");
        if (tok.type === "num") {
          pos++;
          return tok.value;
        }
        if (accept("(")) {
          const value = parseExpr();
          if (!accept(")")) throw new Error("Expected ')'");
          return value;
        }
        throw new Error(`Unexpected token '${tok.type}'`);
      }
    
      if (tokens.length === 0) throw new Error("Empty expression");
      const result = parseExpr();
      if (pos !== tokens.length) {
        const tok = tokens[pos];
        throw new Error(
          `Unexpected token '${tok.type === "num" ? tok.value : tok.type}'`
        );
      }
      return result;
    }
    ```

    762 tokens in, 1,491 out (435 of them reasoning) · 15.8 s · $0.0336 · 1 message on Pro · answered by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 via Claude Platform on AWS ·

  • Gemini 3.1 Pro

    Passed: All 15 tests passed.

    ```javascript
    function evaluate(expression) {
        let pos = 0;
    
        function peek() {
            while (pos < expression.length && expression[pos] === ' ') {
                pos++;
            }
            return pos < expression.length ? expression[pos] : null;
        }
    
        function parseExpr() {
            let left = parseTerm();
            while (true) {
                let char = peek();
                if (char === '+' || char === '-') {
                    pos++;
                    let right = parseTerm();
                    if (char === '+') left += right;
                    else left -= right;
                } else {
                    break;
                }
            }
            return left;
        }
    
        function parseTerm() {
            let left = parseFactor();
            while (true) {
                let char = peek();
                if (char === '*' || char === '/') {
                    pos++;
                    let right = parseFactor();
                    if (char === '*') left *= right;
                    else left /= right;
                } else {
                    break;
                }
            }
            return left;
        }
    
        function parseFactor() {
            let char = peek();
            if (char === '-') {
                pos++;
                return -parseFactor();
            }
            return parsePower();
        }
    
        function parsePower() {
            let left = parsePrimary();
            let char = peek();
            if (char === '^') {
                pos++;
                let right = parseFactor();
                return Math.pow(left, right);
            }
            return left;
        }
    
        function parsePrimary() {
            let char = peek();
            if (char === null) {
                throw new Error("Unexpected end of expression");
            }
    
            if (char === '(') {
                pos++;
                let val = parseExpr();
                if (peek() !== ')') {
                    throw new Error("Missing closing parenthesis");
                }
                pos++;
                return val;
            }
    
            let match = expression.slice(pos).match(/^\d+(\.\d+)?/);
            if (!match) {
                throw new Error(`Invalid character at position ${pos}`);
            }
            pos += match[0].length;
            return parseFloat(match[0]);
        }
    
        let result = parseExpr();
        if (peek() !== null) {
            throw new Error(`Unexpected character at position ${pos}`);
        }
        
        return result;
    }
    ```

    587 tokens in, 2,831 out (2,262 of them reasoning) · 20.6 s · $0.0351 · 1 message on Pro · answered by google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview via Google ·

Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) on every plan

Whether the one-time free trial reaches each model, then each paid plan's messages on it.

Messages on Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview), plan by plan
PlanPriceClaude Opus 5.5Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview)
Free$0Not in the trialIn the one-time trial of 5 messages
Pro$20 a monthUp to 62 a monthUp to 125 a month
Max$50 a monthUp to 200 a monthUp to 400 a month
Ultra$100 a monthUp to 450 a monthUp to 900 a month
Studio$200 a monthUp to 1,000 a monthUp to 2,000 a month

Prices don't include tax, which is added where it applies and shown before you pay. A paid plan's month is one allowance shared by every model, so each monthly count is the most you get if all of it goes to that model. It renews each billing period; everyday models refill daily at 00:00 UTC. Long chats count more per reply. How pricing works.

Every limit is published. Paid plans also have a monthly fair-use limit on AI cost: Pro $7.50, Max $20, Ultra $42, Studio $85. Using every message on your plan at typical sizes stays under it; very large messages and heavy research use it faster. Every limit, explained.

What differs

  • Messages on Pro

    Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) gets twice as many messages: up to 125 messages a month on Pro, against up to 62 messages a month for Claude Opus 5.5.

  • Context window

    Claude Opus 5.5 takes up to 1M tokens; Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) up to 1.05M tokens. A chat in llmwise holds up to 200k tokens, which fits in either, so the difference shows only through each maker's own API.

  • Images and PDFs

    Both read images. Both take a PDF as the whole file, pages and all.

  • On Free

    Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) is in the free trial; Claude Opus 5.5 needs a paid plan.

  • Where messages go

    Claude Opus 5.5: Sent to Anthropic directly. Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview): Sent to Google directly.

Fact by fact

Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview), fact by fact
FactClaude Opus 5.5Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview)
Context window1M tokens1.05M tokens
Reads imagesYesYes
PDFsWhole fileWhole file
ReasoningYesYes
API price (September 2026)$4.00 in / $20.00 out per million tokens$2.00 in / $12.00 out per million tokens
A typical message at API prices (4,000 tokens in, 700 out)$0.0300$0.0164
A $10 top-up adds50 messages100 messages
Where a message goesSent to Anthropic directly.Sent to Google directly.
If the provider failsIf Anthropic fails before the reply starts (an overload, a server error, a dropped connection), llmwise sends the same request to Claude Opus 5.5 through OpenRouter instead.If Google fails before the reply starts (an overload, a server error, a dropped connection), llmwise sends the same request to Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) through OpenRouter instead.
Anthropic's safety fallbackAnthropic's safety system can pass a Claude Opus 5.5 message to another Claude model. The reply then names the model that answered and says what you were charged for.Doesn't apply
API prices are what our model catalog lists (Claude: Anthropic's list price; Gemini: Google's list price). In llmwise you pay per message, not per token: the counts above are what you get.

Claude Opus 5.5 or Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview)?

From the facts above and our test runs: the rest is how their answers suit your work, which one chat can show you.

  • Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview): more messages for the money, up to 125 messages a month on Pro; you can try it in the free trial.

Each model's page, the families, and other pairs

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) is one pair of models. The page below covers the whole families.

Questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 or Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) cheaper in llmwise?

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) gets twice as many messages: up to 125 messages a month on Pro, against up to 62 messages a month for Claude Opus 5.5. Every paid plan's monthly allowance is shared by all models, so each count is the most you get if it all goes to that model.

Can I try Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) for free?

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) is, in the free trial of 5 messages; Claude Opus 5.5 needs a paid plan.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 or Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview)?

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview): 1.05M tokens, against 1M tokens. A chat in llmwise holds up to 200k tokens, which fits in either, so the difference shows only through each maker's own API.

Can I use Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) in the same chat?

Yes. Pick Claude Opus 5.5 for one message and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) for the next; the second sees the whole chat, including the first one's answer.

Which did better in your test runs, Claude Opus 5.5 or Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview)?

On the same 50 prompts, run on September 27, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 passed 49 and Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) passed 49. The table on this page has each job, and every reply is published.

Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Kimi, and GLM, in one chat.

See what a message costs before you send it. Free is 5 messages to try; sign in with an email link, no password or card.