Claude Haiku 5.5 · Data analysis
Claude Haiku 5.5 for data analysis: our test runs
Claude Haiku 5.5 ran our 5 data analysis prompts in llmwise, through the same pipeline your messages take. Here's every reply as it came, whether it passed, what it cost and what it counts as on Pro, next to the other models.
Based on 5 of our test runs on , through OpenRouter with the app's own prompt and settings. Updated .
Short answer
In our test runs on October 7, 2026, Claude Haiku 5.5 passed 5 of 5 of our data analysis prompts (both hard ones): tied 1st of 18 models. Each reply counted as 1 message on Pro, where it has 60 a day, and cost $0.0004 to run on average.
Prompt by prompt
Each of the 5 data analysis prompts, and how Claude Haiku 5.5's reply did.
| Prompt | Result | Cost | Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| The region with the most revenueEveryday | Passed: Final answer North, 1085: right. | $0.0003 | 3.4 s |
| Average order value in AugustEveryday | Passed: Final answer 300.00: right. | $0.0002 | 1.3 s |
| Revenue change from July to AugustEveryday | Passed: Final answer 67.4%: right. | $0.0004 | 3.3 s |
| A median, filtered two waysHard | Passed: Final answer 6.25: right. | $0.0002 | 2.6 s |
| Correlation between ad spend and sign-upsHard | Passed: Final answer 0.97: right. | $0.0007 | 5.7 s |
Every data analysis reply from Claude Haiku 5.5
The region with the most revenue
An everyday prompt: “The region with the most revenue”, in full.
Passed: Final answer North, 1085: right.
Revenue = quantity × price, summed by region: - **West:** 90 + 310 + 240 + 225 = **865** - **East:** 120 + 135 + 310 + 360 = **925** - **North:** 180 + 240 + 620 + 45 = **1085** Final answer: North, 1085
816 tokens in, 336 out (231 of them reasoning) · 3.4 s · $0.0003 · 1 message on Pro · answered by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via Anthropic ·
Average order value in August
An everyday prompt: “Average order value in August”, in full.
Passed: Final answer 300.00: right.
August orders (1007–1012): - 1007: 2 × 120.00 = 240.00 - 1008: 1 × 310.00 = 310.00 - 1009: 2 × 310.00 = 620.00 - 1010: 5 × 45.00 = 225.00 - 1011: 3 × 120.00 = 360.00 - 1012: 1 × 45.00 = 45.00 Total revenue: 240 + 310 + 620 + 225 + 360 + 45 = 1,800.00 Number of orders: 6 Average: 1,800.00 / 6 = 300.00 Final answer: 300.00
824 tokens in, 208 out · 1.3 s · $0.0002 · 1 message on Pro · answered by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via Anthropic ·
Revenue change from July to August
An everyday prompt: “Revenue change from July to August”, in full.
Passed: Final answer 67.4%: right.
**July 2026 revenue:** - 1001: 2 × 45 = 90 - 1002: 1 × 120 = 120 - 1003: 1 × 310 = 310 - 1004: 4 × 45 = 180 - 1005: 3 × 45 = 135 - 1006: 2 × 120 = 240 - Total: **1,075** **August 2026 revenue:** - 1007: 2 × 120 = 240 - 1008: 1 × 310 = 310 - 1009: 2 × 310 = 620 - 1010: 5 × 45 = 225 - 1011: 3 × 120 = 360 - 1012: 1 × 45 = 45 - Total: **1,800** **Change:** (1,800 − 1,075) / 1,075 = 725 / 1,075 ≈ 0.6744, or 67.4%. Final answer: 67.4%
832 tokens in, 575 out (277 of them reasoning) · 3.3 s · $0.0004 · 1 message on Pro · answered by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via Anthropic ·
A median, filtered two ways
A hard prompt: “A median, filtered two ways”, in full.
Passed: Final answer 6.25: right.
Billing tickets with high priority: - T1: 5.5 - T4: 2 - T6: 9 - T9: 7 - T10: 26 - T12: 4 Sorted: 2, 4, 5.5, 7, 9, 26 With six values, the median is the average of the middle two: (5.5 + 7) / 2 = 6.25 Final answer: 6.25
692 tokens in, 240 out (114 of them reasoning) · 2.6 s · $0.0002 · 1 message on Pro · answered by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via Anthropic ·
Correlation between ad spend and sign-ups
A hard prompt: “Correlation between ad spend and sign-ups”, in full.
Passed: Final answer 0.97: right.
**Working:** - n = 8 - Mean ad_spend = 6150 / 8 = 768.75 - Mean signups = 434 / 8 = 54.25 - Sum of cross-deviations (Σ(x−x̄)(y−ȳ)) = 23,912.5 - Sum of squared x-deviations (Σ(x−x̄)²) = 624,687.5 - Sum of squared y-deviations (Σ(y−ȳ)²) = 971.5 r = 23,912.5 / √(624,687.5 × 971.5) ≈ 23,912.5 / 24,635.9 ≈ 0.971 Final answer: 0.97
608 tokens in, 1,298 out (1,075 of them reasoning) · 5.7 s · $0.0007 · 1 message on Pro · answered by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 via Anthropic ·
How it compares on data analysis
Claude Haiku 5.5 beside the job's picks among every model. 14 models share the hard-problems pick, Claude Haiku 5.5 among them.
| Model | Passed | On Pro | Cost per reply |
|---|---|---|---|
| GLM 5.3Our pick: hard problems (shared), best value | 5 of 5 | 250 a month on Pro | $0.0019 |
| GPT-6 LunaOur pick: hard problems (shared), everyday | 5 of 5 | 60 a day on Pro | $0.0002 |
| Claude Haiku 5.5Our pick: hard problems (shared) | 5 of 5 | 60 a day on Pro | $0.0004 |
Every limit is published. Paid plans also have a monthly fair-use limit on AI cost: Pro $7.50, Max $20, Ultra $42, Studio $85. Using every message on your plan at typical sizes stays under it; very large messages and heavy research use it faster. Every limit, explained.
Claude Haiku 5.5 next to each model on data analysis
Claude Haiku 5.5 against each model on the same 5 data analysis prompts. One run each, through OpenRouter: a wait depends on the provider and the load that day, so a lead under 10% counts as close.
Against Claude Fable 5.1: Claude Haiku 5.5 answered 1.5× sooner (3.3 s to 4.9 s), cost 78.9× less, and passed 5 of 5 to its 5.
Against Claude Opus 5.5: Claude Haiku 5.5 answered 1.4× sooner (3.3 s to 4.6 s), cost 36.5× less, and passed 5 of 5 to its 5.
Against Claude Sonnet 5.5: Claude Haiku 5.5 answered 1.4× later (3.3 s to 2.3 s), cost 13.1× less, and passed 5 of 5 to its 5.
Against Claude Sonnet 5: Claude Haiku 5.5 answered 1.6× sooner (3.3 s to 5.3 s), cost 19.2× less, and passed 5 of 5 to its 4. Only Claude Haiku 5.5 passed Correlation between ad spend and sign-ups.
Against Claude Haiku 4.5: Claude Haiku 5.5 answered 1.2× later (3.3 s to 2.7 s), cost 7.0× less, and passed 5 of 5 to its 3. Only Claude Haiku 5.5 passed Average order value in August; Correlation between ad spend and sign-ups.
Against GPT-6 Astra: Claude Haiku 5.5 answered within 10% of its time (3.3 s to 3.3 s), cost 43.1× less, and passed 5 of 5 to its 5.
Against GPT-6.1 Sol: Claude Haiku 5.5 answered within 10% of its time (3.3 s to 3.0 s), cost 4.4× less, and passed 5 of 5 to its 5.
Against GPT-6 Sol: Claude Haiku 5.5 answered 1.2× later (3.3 s to 2.8 s), cost 9.4× less, and passed 5 of 5 to its 5.
Against GPT-6 Luna: Claude Haiku 5.5 answered 1.3× later (3.3 s to 2.5 s), cost 2.0× more, and passed 5 of 5 to its 5.
Against Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview): Claude Haiku 5.5 answered 2.6× sooner (3.3 s to 8.6 s), cost 43.1× less, and passed 5 of 5 to its 5.
Against Gemini 3.8 Flash: Claude Haiku 5.5 answered 1.6× sooner (3.3 s to 5.4 s), cost 7.7× less, and passed 5 of 5 to its 4. Only Claude Haiku 5.5 passed Correlation between ad spend and sign-ups.
Against DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Claude Haiku 5.5 answered 3.8× later (3.3 s to 0.9 s), cost 2.4× less, and passed 5 of 5 to its 5.
Against DeepSeek V4 Pro: Claude Haiku 5.5 answered 1.2× sooner (3.3 s to 4.1 s), cost 8.0× less, and passed 5 of 5 to its 5.
Against Grok 4.7: Claude Haiku 5.5 answered 2.7× sooner (3.3 s to 8.9 s), cost 31.0× less, and passed 5 of 5 to its 5.
Against Kimi K3: Claude Haiku 5.5 answered within 10% of its time (3.3 s to 3.5 s), cost 18.9× less, and passed 5 of 5 to its 5.
Against GLM 5.3: Claude Haiku 5.5 answered 1.7× later (3.3 s to 1.9 s), cost 5.3× less, and passed 5 of 5 to its 5.
Against GLM 5.3 Flash: Claude Haiku 5.5 answered 3.0× sooner (3.3 s to 9.8 s), cost within 10% of it, and passed 5 of 5 to its 4. Only Claude Haiku 5.5 passed Correlation between ad spend and sign-ups.
How these runs were done
Final answer. Automatic. The reply's last “Final answer:” line must hold the right value.
Claude Haiku 5.5, and data analysis, elsewhere
- Claude Haiku 5.5: price, limits and messages on every plan
- Claude for data analysis
- Claude Haiku 5.5 for coding: our test runs
- Claude Haiku 5.5 for writing: our test runs
- Claude Haiku 5.5 for math: our test runs
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Haiku 4.5
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 Flash
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Analyze a CSV with code: the prompt, and its price
- AI prompts for business, tested on four models
- Our test runs: 50 prompts on every model
Questions
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 good for data analysis?
In our test runs it passed 5 of 5 data analysis prompts, tied 1st of the 18 models in llmwise. Every reply is on this page, so you can judge them yourself.
How many of my messages does a data analysis reply from Claude Haiku 5.5 use?
1 message each on Pro, where it has 60 a day on Pro. The price of a message is fixed and shown before you send it, however long the reply.
How were these runs done?
The same way for every model: each prompt sent through llmwise's own pipeline, each reply checked the same way. The methods page has every prompt and how each is scored.
Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Kimi, and GLM, in one chat.
See what a message costs before you send it. Free is 5 messages to try; sign in with an email link, no password or card.