Model vs model
Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 Flash
Grok 4.7 and GLM 5.3 Flash are both in llmwise. What each gets on every plan, what it reads, how it's served and what happens when its provider fails, from the catalog and the code that runs them.
Model prices and specs checked against OpenRouter's Grok 4.7 page, OpenRouter's GLM 5.3 Flash page. Updated .
Short answer
GLM 5.3 Flash is an everyday model (60 messages a day on Pro); Grok 4.7 draws on the monthly allowance (up to 250 messages a month on Pro). Otherwise, only Grok 4.7 reads a PDF as the whole file. In our test runs, Grok 4.7 passed 47 of the 50 prompts both answered and GLM 5.3 Flash 40; 7 prompts split them, most on summarization (5 to 3).
Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 Flash, prompt by prompt
Every prompt Grok 4.7 and GLM 5.3 Flash both answered, compared directly, their biggest differences first. One run each, through OpenRouter: a wait depends on the provider and the load that day, so a lead under 10% counts as close.
Of the 50 prompts both answered, both passed 40, only Grok 4.7 passed 7, only GLM 5.3 Flash passed 0, and neither passed 3. Grok 4.7 answered sooner on 16 of the 50 and GLM 5.3 Flash on 32; the rest were within 10% of each other. The 50 replies cost $0.3875 on Grok 4.7 and $0.0096 on GLM 5.3 Flash: 40.2× less on GLM 5.3 Flash.
The 7 prompts only one of Grok 4.7 and GLM 5.3 Flash passed
A product announcement with five rules (writing): Grok 4.7 passed and GLM 5.3 Flash didn't. Grok 4.7: Graded 4.0 of 5 on average (lowest 3). GLM 5.3 Flash: Graded 3.3 of 5 on average (lowest 3).
An article in three bullets (summarization): Grok 4.7 passed and GLM 5.3 Flash didn't. Grok 4.7: Graded 4.7 of 5 on average (lowest 4). GLM 5.3 Flash: Graded 4.7 of 5 on average (lowest 4); but 61 words, over the 60 allowed.
An email thread in one sentence (summarization): Grok 4.7 passed and GLM 5.3 Flash didn't. Grok 4.7: Graded 4.7 of 5 on average (lowest 4). GLM 5.3 Flash: Graded 3.7 of 5 on average (lowest 3).
Correlation between ad spend and sign-ups (data analysis): Grok 4.7 passed and GLM 5.3 Flash didn't. Grok 4.7: Final answer 0.97: right. GLM 5.3 Flash: Final answer 0.99; expected 0.97.
A late order (customer support): Grok 4.7 passed and GLM 5.3 Flash didn't. Grok 4.7: Graded 4.3 of 5 on average (lowest 4). GLM 5.3 Flash: Graded 3.7 of 5 on average (lowest 3).
A refund request outside the window (customer support): Grok 4.7 passed and GLM 5.3 Flash didn't. Grok 4.7: Graded 4.0 of 5 on average (lowest 3). GLM 5.3 Flash: Graded 4.0 of 5 on average (lowest 2).
Book a meeting from a sentence (agents and tool use): Grok 4.7 passed and GLM 5.3 Flash didn't. Grok 4.7: Made the 1 expected call. GLM 5.3 Flash: Expected create_event(attendees: ["priya@northwind.test"], duration_minutes: 30, start: "2026-10-08T15:00", title: {"contains":"Q4"}); got find_contact(name: "Priya Shah"); create_event(title: "Q4 plan review", start: "2026-10-08T15:00", duration_minutes: 30, attendees: ["priya@northwind.test"]).
Job by job, the widest gaps first
Customer support: Grok 4.7 passed 4 of 5 and GLM 5.3 Flash 2 of 5. GLM 5.3 Flash answered 1.9× sooner at the median, 11.6 s against 6.2 s. GLM 5.3 Flash cost 31.5× less, $0.0306 against $0.0010 for the 5 replies. GLM 5.3 Flash's replies ran 54% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Summarization: Grok 4.7 passed 5 of 5 and GLM 5.3 Flash 3 of 5. Grok 4.7 answered 1.4× sooner at the median, 2.8 s against 4.0 s. GLM 5.3 Flash cost 24.8× less, $0.0141 against $0.0006 for the 5 replies. GLM 5.3 Flash's replies ran 13% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Agents and tool use: Grok 4.7 passed 5 of 5 and GLM 5.3 Flash 4 of 5. GLM 5.3 Flash answered 1.6× sooner at the median, 5.2 s against 3.2 s. GLM 5.3 Flash cost 30.5× less, $0.0197 against $0.0006 for the 5 replies. GLM 5.3 Flash's replies ran 11% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Data analysis: Grok 4.7 passed 5 of 5 and GLM 5.3 Flash 4 of 5. Their median waits were close, 8.9 s against 9.8 s. GLM 5.3 Flash cost 28.9× less, $0.0556 against $0.0019 for the 5 replies. GLM 5.3 Flash's replies ran 131% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Writing: Grok 4.7 passed 3 of 5 and GLM 5.3 Flash 2 of 5. Grok 4.7 answered 1.4× sooner at the median, 6.0 s against 8.5 s. GLM 5.3 Flash cost 18.0× less, $0.0288 against $0.0016 for the 5 replies. GLM 5.3 Flash's replies ran 21% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Coding: Grok 4.7 passed 5 of 5 and GLM 5.3 Flash 5 of 5. GLM 5.3 Flash answered 3.8× sooner at the median, 31.6 s against 8.4 s. GLM 5.3 Flash cost 97.2× less, $0.1229 against $0.0013 for the 5 replies. Their replies ran to about the same length.
Translation: Grok 4.7 passed 5 of 5 and GLM 5.3 Flash 5 of 5. GLM 5.3 Flash answered 2.6× sooner at the median, 10.7 s against 4.1 s. GLM 5.3 Flash cost 83.0× less, $0.0410 against $0.0005 for the 5 replies. GLM 5.3 Flash's replies ran 22% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Math: Grok 4.7 passed 5 of 5 and GLM 5.3 Flash 5 of 5. GLM 5.3 Flash answered 4.3× sooner at the median, 11.7 s against 2.7 s. GLM 5.3 Flash cost 48.1× less, $0.0362 against $0.0008 for the 5 replies. Grok 4.7's replies ran 36% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
SQL: Grok 4.7 passed 5 of 5 and GLM 5.3 Flash 5 of 5. GLM 5.3 Flash answered 2.1× sooner at the median, 3.0 s against 1.4 s. GLM 5.3 Flash cost 37.1× less, $0.0240 against $0.0006 for the 5 replies. Their replies ran to about the same length.
RAG and answering from documents: Grok 4.7 passed 5 of 5 and GLM 5.3 Flash 5 of 5. Grok 4.7 answered 1.2× sooner at the median, 1.9 s against 2.2 s. GLM 5.3 Flash cost 19.0× less, $0.0146 against $0.0008 for the 5 replies. GLM 5.3 Flash's replies ran 136% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
All 50 prompts: who passed, who answered sooner, who cost less
| Prompt | Result | Sooner | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turn a title into a URL slug | Both passed | GLM 5.3 Flash, 5.4×took 14.3 s and 2.6 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 115.5×cost $0.0078 and $0.0001 |
| Parse a duration like “1h 30m” | Both passed | GLM 5.3 Flash, 3.9×took 31.6 s and 8.2 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 48.3×cost $0.0167 and $0.0003 |
| Merge overlapping intervals | Both passed | Grok 4.7, 1.6×took 6.1 s and 9.6 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 18.9×cost $0.0045 and $0.0002 |
| Evaluate an arithmetic expression, no eval | Both passed | GLM 5.3 Flash, 9.9×took 110.1 s and 11.1 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 163.6×cost $0.0574 and $0.0004 |
| Parse CSV with quoted fields | Both passed | GLM 5.3 Flash, 8.6×took 72.2 s and 8.4 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 139.9×cost $0.0364 and $0.0003 |
| Announce a second bakery shop on LinkedIn | Both passed | Grok 4.7, 2.5×took 16.1 s and 39.6 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 8.8×cost $0.0093 and $0.0011 |
| Rewrite corporate jargon in plain words | Neither passed | GLM 5.3 Flash, 4.0×took 20.0 s and 4.9 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 116.1×cost $0.0112 and $0.0001 |
| Decline a meeting and offer two times | Both passed | Grok 4.7, 2.1×took 2.5 s and 5.3 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 15.6×cost $0.0024 and $0.0002 |
| A product announcement with five rules | Only Grok 4.7 | Grok 4.7, 3.4×took 2.5 s and 8.5 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 17.1×cost $0.0025 and $0.0001 |
| Argue both sides of free buses | Neither passed | Grok 4.7, 1.9×took 6.0 s and 11.2 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 22.7×cost $0.0034 and $0.0001 |
| A discount, then sales tax | Both passed | GLM 5.3 Flash, 2.0×took 4.8 s and 2.4 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 38.0×cost $0.0033 and $0.0001 |
| Pens at 3 for $4 | Both passed | GLM 5.3 Flash, 1.3×took 18.5 s and 14.6 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 40.6×cost $0.0111 and $0.0003 |
| Compound interest over three years | Both passed | GLM 5.3 Flash, 1.6×took 8.0 s and 4.9 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 31.7×cost $0.0051 and $0.0002 |
| Four-digit numbers whose digits sum to 9 | Both passed | GLM 5.3 Flash, 5.6×took 15.1 s and 2.7 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 76.8×cost $0.0093 and $0.0001 |
| The highest of three dice is a 5 | Both passed | GLM 5.3 Flash, 12.4×took 11.7 s and 0.9 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 67.0×cost $0.0074 and $0.0001 |
| An article in three bullets | Only Grok 4.7 | Grok 4.7, 1.5×took 2.6 s and 4.0 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 25.0×cost $0.0025 and $0.0001 |
| An email thread in one sentence | Only Grok 4.7 | Grok 4.7, 1.4×took 2.8 s and 4.0 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 14.7×cost $0.0021 and $0.0001 |
| Decisions and action items from a meeting | Both passed | GLM 5.3 Flash, 2.8×took 5.3 s and 1.9 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 41.5×cost $0.0036 and $0.0001 |
| A quarterly memo for the CEO | Both passed | Grok 4.7, 2.1×took 4.0 s and 8.3 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 23.8×cost $0.0035 and $0.0001 |
| A study with a negative result | Both passed | Grok 4.7, 1.3×took 2.8 s and 3.7 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 26.0×cost $0.0024 and $0.0001 |
| The region with the most revenue | Both passed | Closetook 8.9 s and 8.8 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 12.9×cost $0.0067 and $0.0005 |
| Average order value in August | Both passed | Grok 4.7, 1.6×took 9.1 s and 14.5 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 19.6×cost $0.0072 and $0.0004 |
| Revenue change from July to August | Both passed | Grok 4.7, 1.3×took 7.7 s and 9.8 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 20.0×cost $0.0074 and $0.0004 |
| A median, filtered two ways | Both passed | GLM 5.3 Flash, 1.2×took 4.4 s and 3.7 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 30.8×cost $0.0037 and $0.0001 |
| Correlation between ad spend and sign-ups | Only Grok 4.7 | GLM 5.3 Flash, 2.6×took 50.5 s and 19.4 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 56.3×cost $0.0306 and $0.0005 |
| A late order | Only Grok 4.7 | GLM 5.3 Flash, 2.8×took 17.5 s and 6.2 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 33.0×cost $0.0084 and $0.0003 |
| A return inside the window | Both passed | Grok 4.7, 1.3×took 4.8 s and 6.2 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 17.2×cost $0.0039 and $0.0002 |
| A frustrated customer | Neither passed | GLM 5.3 Flash, 1.7×took 11.6 s and 6.8 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 49.1×cost $0.0075 and $0.0002 |
| A refund request outside the window | Only Grok 4.7 | GLM 5.3 Flash, 1.5×took 3.6 s and 2.4 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 20.8×cost $0.0034 and $0.0002 |
| A message with a planted instruction | Both passed | GLM 5.3 Flash, 2.3×took 11.7 s and 5.2 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 41.8×cost $0.0075 and $0.0002 |
| A delivery message into Spanish | Both passed | GLM 5.3 Flash, 2.6×took 10.2 s and 3.9 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 71.3×cost $0.0068 and $0.0001 |
| A product description into French | Both passed | GLM 5.3 Flash, 3.8×took 15.7 s and 4.1 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 104.9×cost $0.0095 and $0.0001 |
| A meeting note into German | Both passed | GLM 5.3 Flash, 5.3×took 22.4 s and 4.2 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 158.6×cost $0.0121 and $0.0001 |
| Idioms into natural Japanese | Both passed | GLM 5.3 Flash, 2.2×took 10.7 s and 4.8 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 71.5×cost $0.0062 and $0.0001 |
| A lease clause into Brazilian Portuguese | Both passed | GLM 5.3 Flash, 7.3×took 9.8 s and 1.3 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 44.3×cost $0.0064 and $0.0001 |
| Customers in one country | Both passed | GLM 5.3 Flash, 1.2×took 1.5 s and 1.2 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 16.8×cost $0.0022 and $0.0001 |
| Count orders by status | Both passed | Grok 4.7, 1.7×took 1.3 s and 2.1 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 16.5×cost $0.0021 and $0.0001 |
| Revenue by category | Both passed | GLM 5.3 Flash, 1.2×took 3.0 s and 2.6 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 28.3×cost $0.0032 and $0.0001 |
| Every customer, even those without orders | Both passed | GLM 5.3 Flash, 10.5×took 10.3 s and 1.0 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 61.8×cost $0.0072 and $0.0001 |
| Monthly revenue with a running total | Both passed | GLM 5.3 Flash, 9.9×took 14.3 s and 1.4 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 59.5×cost $0.0093 and $0.0002 |
| A fact from one section | Both passed | GLM 5.3 Flash, 2.2×took 1.6 s and 0.7 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 13.1×cost $0.0026 and $0.0002 |
| Core hours and start times | Both passed | Grok 4.7, 2.0×took 1.9 s and 3.9 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 12.4×cost $0.0028 and $0.0002 |
| Two sections in one answer | Both passed | Closetook 2.0 s and 1.9 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 27.9×cost $0.0029 and $0.0001 |
| A later amendment changes the answer | Both passed | GLM 5.3 Flash, 2.0×took 4.4 s and 2.2 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 25.9×cost $0.0037 and $0.0001 |
| A question the handbook doesn't answer | Both passed | Grok 4.7, 1.6×took 1.9 s and 2.9 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 26.8×cost $0.0026 and $0.0001 |
| Pick the tool and work out the date | Both passed | GLM 5.3 Flash, 1.6×took 5.2 s and 3.2 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 40.1×cost $0.0023 and $0.0001 |
| Convert a currency | Both passed | Grok 4.7, 1.5×took 1.9 s and 3.0 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 15.9×cost $0.0024 and $0.0001 |
| Book a meeting from a sentence | Only Grok 4.7 | GLM 5.3 Flash, 2.2×took 14.7 s and 6.8 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 51.4×cost $0.0085 and $0.0002 |
| Search, but don't book | Both passed | GLM 5.3 Flash, 1.5×took 3.4 s and 2.3 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 29.1×cost $0.0023 and $0.0001 |
| Two calls with a unit conversion | Both passed | GLM 5.3 Flash, 1.5×took 5.2 s and 3.4 s | GLM 5.3 Flash, 21.8×cost $0.0043 and $0.0002 |
Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 Flash in our test runs
Grok 4.7 and GLM 5.3 Flash on the same prompts, job by job: how many replies passed their check.
Based on 100 of our test runs on , through OpenRouter with the app's own prompt and settings. Updated .
| Job | Grok 4.7 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Coding | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Writing | 3 of 5 | 2 of 5 |
| Math | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Summarization | 5 of 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Data analysis | 5 of 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Customer support | 4 of 5 | 2 of 5 |
| Translation | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| SQL | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| RAG and answering from documents | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Agents and tool use | 5 of 5 | 4 of 5 |
| All jobs | 47 of 50 · 1 message each · $0.0077 a reply | 40 of 50 · 1 message each · $0.0002 a reply |
The same prompts, sent to both through llmwise's own pipeline and checked the same way: five for each job. A bold count is the one that passed more. Messages: what each reply counted as on Pro. Cost: what OpenRouter charged us per reply, on average. Every prompt, and how it's scored.
Where they differed most, summarization: both replies to a prompt only one of them passed.
An everyday prompt: “An article in three bullets”, in full.
Grok 4.7
Passed: Graded 4.7 of 5 on average (lowest 4).
- Aldmoor’s six-month Market Street bike-lane trial ends; the council votes in November on making them permanent. - Daily bike trips rose from about 900 to 2,300; car traffic fell 14%, with rush-hour delays of just over a minute. - Businesses were split; cyclist injuries fell from nine to two; permanence would add €1.1 million to the €410,000 install cost.
1,759 tokens in, 115 out (25 of them reasoning) · 2.6 s · $0.0025 · 1 message on Pro · answered by x-ai/grok-4.7 via xAI ·
GLM 5.3 Flash
Failed: Graded 4.7 of 5 on average (lowest 4); but 61 words, over the 60 allowed.
- Aldmoor's six-month Market Street bike lane trial ended; council votes in November on making it permanent. - Cycling rose from ~900 to 2,300 daily trips, injuries dropped from nine to two, car traffic fell 14% with just over a minute added to rush-hour travel times. - Businesses are split (27 more customers, 19 fewer, 14 unchanged); lanes cost €410k, permanence needs €1.1m more.
539 tokens in, 98 out · 4.0 s · $0.0001 · 1 message on Pro · answered by z-ai/glm-5.3-flash via AtlasCloud ·
Grok 4.7 and GLM 5.3 Flash on every plan
Whether the one-time free trial reaches each model, then each paid plan's messages on it.
| Plan | Price | Grok 4.7 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | Not in the trial | Not in the trial |
| Plus | $10 a month | Up to 125 a month | 30 a day |
| Pro | $20 a month | Up to 250 a month | 60 a day |
| Max | $50 a month | Up to 800 a month | 120 a day |
| Ultra | $100 a month | Up to 1,800 a month | 200 a day |
| Studio | $200 a month | Up to 4,000 a month | 200 a day |
Prices don't include tax, which is added where it applies and shown before you pay. A paid plan's month is one allowance shared by every model, so each monthly count is the most you get if all of it goes to that model. It renews each billing period; everyday models refill daily at 00:00 UTC. Long chats count more per reply. How pricing works.
Every limit is published. Paid plans also have a monthly fair-use limit on AI cost: Plus $3.75, Pro $7.50, Max $20, Ultra $42, Studio $85. Using every message on your plan at typical sizes stays under it; very large messages and heavy research use it faster. Every limit, explained.
What differs
Messages on Pro
GLM 5.3 Flash is an everyday model (60 messages a day on Pro); Grok 4.7 draws on the monthly allowance (up to 250 messages a month on Pro).
Context window
Grok 4.7 takes up to 500K tokens; GLM 5.3 Flash up to 1.05M tokens. A chat in llmwise holds up to 200k tokens, which fits in either, so the difference shows only through each maker's own API.
Images and PDFs
Both read images. GLM 5.3 Flash gets a PDF's text rather than the file itself.
On Free
Neither is in the free trial: both need a paid plan, from Plus.
Where messages go
Grok 4.7: Served through OpenRouter by xAI alone, on an endpoint that doesn't store or train on prompts. GLM 5.3 Flash: Served through OpenRouter, only by hosts that don't store or train on prompts. The maker's own endpoint is never asked.
Fact by fact
| Fact | Grok 4.7 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 500K tokens | 1.05M tokens |
| Reads images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Whole file | Text only |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| API price (October 2026) | $2.00 in / $6.00 out per million tokens | $0.15 in / $0.50 out per million tokens |
| A typical message at API prices (4,000 tokens in, 700 out) | $0.0122 | $0.0010 |
| A $10 top-up adds | 200 messages | Nothing: an everyday model's count is daily |
| Where a message goes | Served through OpenRouter by xAI alone, on an endpoint that doesn't store or train on prompts. | Served through OpenRouter, only by hosts that don't store or train on prompts. The maker's own endpoint is never asked. |
| If the provider fails | xAI is its only host, so there's no other host to move to: if xAI fails, send the message again or pick another model. | When one host is down, OpenRouter moves the request to another host that meets the same rules. |
| Anthropic's safety fallback | Doesn't apply | Doesn't apply |
Grok 4.7 or GLM 5.3 Flash?
From the facts above and our test runs: the rest is how their answers suit your work, which one chat can show you.
Pick Grok 4.7: it reads a PDF as the whole file, charts and scans included.
Pick GLM 5.3 Flash: its messages come from the daily count (60 messages a day on Pro), so they leave the monthly allowance for bigger models.
Each model's page, the families, and other pairs
Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 Flash is one pair of models. The page below covers the whole families.
- Grok 4.7: price, limits and messages on every plan
- GLM 5.3 Flash: price, limits and messages on every plan
- Grok vs GLM
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.7
- GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.7
- Claude Sonnet 5 vs Grok 4.7
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 Flash
- GLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.3 Flash
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GLM 5.3 Flash
- Every model-vs-model page
Grok 4.7 is a Grok model; GLM 5.3 Flash is a GLM model.
Questions
Is Grok 4.7 or GLM 5.3 Flash cheaper in llmwise?
GLM 5.3 Flash is an everyday model (60 messages a day on Pro); Grok 4.7 draws on the monthly allowance (up to 250 messages a month on Pro). Every paid plan's monthly allowance is shared by the models on it, so each count is the most you get if it all goes to that model.
Can I try Grok 4.7 and GLM 5.3 Flash for free?
Neither is in the free trial of 5 messages: both need a paid plan, from Plus.
Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.7 or GLM 5.3 Flash?
GLM 5.3 Flash: 1.05M tokens, against 500K tokens. A chat in llmwise holds up to 200k tokens, which fits in either, so the difference shows only through each maker's own API.
Can I use Grok 4.7 and GLM 5.3 Flash in the same chat?
Yes. Pick Grok 4.7 for one message and GLM 5.3 Flash for the next; the second sees the whole chat, including the first one's answer.
Which did better in your test runs, Grok 4.7 or GLM 5.3 Flash?
On the same 50 prompts, run on October 2, 2026, Grok 4.7 passed 47 and GLM 5.3 Flash passed 40. The table on this page has each job, and every reply is published.
Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Kimi, GLM, and Mistral, in one chat.
See what a message costs before you send it. Free is 5 messages to try; sign in with an email link, no password or card.