Best LLM for Math and Mathematical Reasoning

We tested the top AI models on calculus, linear algebra, proofs, and competition math. Compare them all through one API with LLMWise.

Test all models free

Evaluation criteria

Mathematical reasoningStep-by-step solutionsSymbolic mathWord problemsProof verification

DeepSeek V3DeepSeek

The clear leader for mathematical reasoning. DeepSeek V3 solves competition-level problems, produces rigorous step-by-step proofs, and handles symbolic manipulation with remarkable accuracy at a fraction of competitor costs.

Top scores on competition math benchmarksRigorous step-by-step proof constructionExcellent symbolic algebra and calculus

Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic

Exceptional at explaining mathematical concepts clearly. Claude Sonnet 4.5 combines strong reasoning with clear pedagogy, making it ideal for tutoring, textbook-style solutions, and checking work.

Best mathematical explanations for learningStrong at multi-step word problemsReliable self-correction when errors are flagged

GPT-5.2OpenAI

A strong generalist that handles most math tasks well. GPT-5.2 is reliable for calculus, statistics, and applied math, though it trails DeepSeek and Claude on the hardest proof-based problems.

Reliable on calculus and statistics problemsGood at applied math and data analysisIntegrates well with code for computational math

Gemini 3 FlashGoogle

Fast and capable for routine math tasks. Gemini 3 Flash handles algebra, basic calculus, and word problems at high speed, making it a good choice for homework help and quick calculations.

Fastest response time for math queriesSolid performance on standard curriculum mathCost-effective for high-volume math tutoring

Llama 4 MaverickMeta

A capable open-source option for math applications. Llama 4 Maverick handles standard math well and can be fine-tuned on domain-specific mathematical content for specialized use cases.

Open-source and fine-tunable for math domainsSolid reasoning on standard problem typesSelf-hostable for educational platforms

Our recommendation

DeepSeek V3 is the best model for pure mathematical reasoning, especially for competition-level and proof-based problems. For math education and tutoring, Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers the clearest explanations. Try both via LLMWise Compare mode to see the difference on your specific problems.

Use LLMWise Compare mode to verify these rankings on your own prompts.

Common questions

Which AI is best at solving complex math problems?

DeepSeek V3 leads on competition-level and proof-based math. It consistently outperforms GPT-5.2 and Claude on benchmarks like MATH and GSM8K, while costing significantly less per query.

How do I test which LLM handles my math use case best?

LLMWise Compare mode lets you send the same math problem to multiple models simultaneously. You can compare their step-by-step solutions, check for errors, and see which model best fits your accuracy and explanation requirements.

Can LLMs reliably verify mathematical proofs?

DeepSeek V3 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 can verify many standard proofs and identify logical gaps. However, for research-level mathematics, AI proof verification should be treated as a helpful assistant rather than a definitive oracle.

Try it yourself

500 free credits. One API key. Nine models. No credit card required.

Get 500 free credits Run traffic replay

GPT-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 3 Flash GPT-5.2 vs Gemini 3 Flash DeepSeek V3 vs GPT-5.2 DeepSeek V3 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Large