Model vs model
Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Haiku 4.5 are both in llmwise. What each gets on every plan, what it reads, how it's served and what happens when its provider fails, from the catalog and the code that runs them.
Model prices and specs checked against OpenRouter's Claude Fable 5.1 page, OpenRouter's Claude Haiku 4.5 page. Updated .
Short answer
Claude Haiku 4.5 gets eight times as many messages: up to 250 messages a month on Pro, against up to 31 messages a month for Claude Fable 5.1. Otherwise, only Claude Fable 5.1 can be passed to another model by its maker's safety system and only Claude Haiku 4.5 is in the free trial. In our test runs, Claude Fable 5.1 passed 45 of the 50 prompts both answered and Claude Haiku 4.5 43; 8 prompts split them, most on coding (5 to 3).
Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Haiku 4.5, prompt by prompt
Every prompt Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Haiku 4.5 both answered, compared directly, their biggest differences first. One run each, through OpenRouter: a wait depends on the provider and the load that day, so a lead under 10% counts as close.
Of the 50 prompts both answered, both passed 40, only Claude Fable 5.1 passed 5, only Claude Haiku 4.5 passed 3, and neither passed 2. Claude Fable 5.1 answered sooner on 0 of the 50 and Claude Haiku 4.5 on 49; the rest were within 10% of each other. The 50 replies cost $1.0018 on Claude Fable 5.1 and $0.0741 on Claude Haiku 4.5: 13.5× less on Claude Haiku 4.5.
The 8 prompts only one of Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Haiku 4.5 passed
Evaluate an arithmetic expression, no eval (coding): Claude Fable 5.1 passed and Claude Haiku 4.5 didn't. Claude Fable 5.1: All 15 tests passed. Claude Haiku 4.5: 14 of 15 tests passed. First failure: evaluate("-2 ^ 2"): Expected values to be strictly deep-equal:
Parse CSV with quoted fields (coding): Claude Fable 5.1 passed and Claude Haiku 4.5 didn't. Claude Fable 5.1: All 8 tests passed. Claude Haiku 4.5: 5 of 8 tests passed. First failure: parseCsv('"line1\nline2",end\r\nnext,row\r\n'): Expected values to be strictly deep-equal:
Argue both sides of free buses (writing): Claude Haiku 4.5 passed and Claude Fable 5.1 didn't. Claude Fable 5.1: Graded 4.7 of 5 on average (lowest 4); but a paragraph of 99 words, over the 90 allowed. Claude Haiku 4.5: Graded 4.0 of 5 on average (lowest 4).
An article in three bullets (summarization): Claude Haiku 4.5 passed and Claude Fable 5.1 didn't. Claude Fable 5.1: Graded 4.3 of 5 on average (lowest 4); but 62 words, over the 60 allowed. Claude Haiku 4.5: Graded 4.0 of 5 on average (lowest 3).
An email thread in one sentence (summarization): Claude Haiku 4.5 passed and Claude Fable 5.1 didn't. Claude Fable 5.1: Graded 5.0 of 5 on average (lowest 5); but 33 words, over the 30 allowed. Claude Haiku 4.5: Graded 4.7 of 5 on average (lowest 4).
Average order value in August (data analysis): Claude Fable 5.1 passed and Claude Haiku 4.5 didn't. Claude Fable 5.1: Final answer 300.00: right. Claude Haiku 4.5: Final answer 275.00; expected 300.
Correlation between ad spend and sign-ups (data analysis): Claude Fable 5.1 passed and Claude Haiku 4.5 didn't. Claude Fable 5.1: Final answer 0.97: right. Claude Haiku 4.5: Final answer 0.99; expected 0.97.
A frustrated customer (customer support): Claude Fable 5.1 passed and Claude Haiku 4.5 didn't. Claude Fable 5.1: Graded 4.7 of 5 on average (lowest 4). Claude Haiku 4.5: Graded 3.3 of 5 on average (lowest 3).
Job by job, the widest gaps first
Summarization: Claude Fable 5.1 passed 3 of 5 and Claude Haiku 4.5 5 of 5. Claude Haiku 4.5 answered 3.0× sooner at the median, 5.0 s against 1.7 s. Claude Haiku 4.5 cost 15.9× less, $0.0805 against $0.0051 for the 5 replies. Claude Fable 5.1's replies ran 59% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Coding: Claude Fable 5.1 passed 5 of 5 and Claude Haiku 4.5 3 of 5. Claude Haiku 4.5 answered 2.4× sooner at the median, 5.5 s against 2.3 s. Claude Haiku 4.5 cost 15.5× less, $0.2126 against $0.0137 for the 5 replies. Claude Fable 5.1's replies ran 37% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Data analysis: Claude Fable 5.1 passed 5 of 5 and Claude Haiku 4.5 3 of 5. Claude Haiku 4.5 answered 1.8× sooner at the median, 4.9 s against 2.7 s. Claude Haiku 4.5 cost 11.3× less, $0.1415 against $0.0125 for the 5 replies. Claude Haiku 4.5's replies ran 103% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Writing: Claude Fable 5.1 passed 3 of 5 and Claude Haiku 4.5 4 of 5. Claude Haiku 4.5 answered 2.7× sooner at the median, 6.0 s against 2.2 s. Claude Haiku 4.5 cost 15.2× less, $0.0862 against $0.0057 for the 5 replies. Claude Fable 5.1's replies ran 63% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Customer support: Claude Fable 5.1 passed 4 of 5 and Claude Haiku 4.5 3 of 5. Claude Haiku 4.5 answered 2.2× sooner at the median, 6.1 s against 2.7 s. Claude Haiku 4.5 cost 15.0× less, $0.1103 against $0.0073 for the 5 replies. Claude Fable 5.1's replies ran 34% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
SQL: Claude Fable 5.1 passed 5 of 5 and Claude Haiku 4.5 5 of 5. Claude Haiku 4.5 answered 3.6× sooner at the median, 4.5 s against 1.2 s. Claude Haiku 4.5 cost 18.7× less, $0.0924 against $0.0049 for the 5 replies. Claude Fable 5.1's replies ran 87% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
RAG and answering from documents: Claude Fable 5.1 passed 5 of 5 and Claude Haiku 4.5 5 of 5. Claude Haiku 4.5 answered 3.4× sooner at the median, 4.0 s against 1.2 s. Claude Haiku 4.5 cost 14.4× less, $0.0727 against $0.0050 for the 5 replies. Claude Fable 5.1's replies ran 16% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Agents and tool use: Claude Fable 5.1 passed 5 of 5 and Claude Haiku 4.5 5 of 5. Claude Haiku 4.5 answered 3.1× sooner at the median, 3.5 s against 1.1 s. Claude Haiku 4.5 cost 12.6× less, $0.0598 against $0.0047 for the 5 replies. Claude Haiku 4.5's replies ran 12% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Translation: Claude Fable 5.1 passed 5 of 5 and Claude Haiku 4.5 5 of 5. Claude Haiku 4.5 answered 2.8× sooner at the median, 5.1 s against 1.8 s. Claude Haiku 4.5 cost 11.9× less, $0.0877 against $0.0074 for the 5 replies. Their replies ran to about the same length.
Math: Claude Fable 5.1 passed 5 of 5 and Claude Haiku 4.5 5 of 5. Claude Haiku 4.5 answered 2.1× sooner at the median, 4.6 s against 2.2 s. Claude Haiku 4.5 cost 7.6× less, $0.0582 against $0.0077 for the 5 replies. Claude Haiku 4.5's replies ran 78% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
All 50 prompts: who passed, who answered sooner, who cost less
| Prompt | Result | Sooner | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turn a title into a URL slug | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 3.6×took 5.5 s and 1.5 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 17.5×cost $0.0167 and $0.0010 |
| Parse a duration like “1h 30m” | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.0×took 4.7 s and 2.3 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 8.0×cost $0.0173 and $0.0022 |
| Merge overlapping intervals | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.7×took 5.3 s and 2.0 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 12.8×cost $0.0214 and $0.0017 |
| Evaluate an arithmetic expression, no eval | Only Claude Fable 5.1 | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.1×took 15.7 s and 7.6 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 15.5×cost $0.0874 and $0.0056 |
| Parse CSV with quoted fields | Only Claude Fable 5.1 | Claude Haiku 4.5, 4.1×took 14.3 s and 3.5 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 21.0×cost $0.0697 and $0.0033 |
| Announce a second bakery shop on LinkedIn | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.9×took 7.3 s and 2.6 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 14.5×cost $0.0184 and $0.0013 |
| Rewrite corporate jargon in plain words | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 3.7×took 6.0 s and 1.6 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 15.8×cost $0.0130 and $0.0008 |
| Decline a meeting and offer two times | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.4×took 4.7 s and 2.0 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 14.8×cost $0.0145 and $0.0010 |
| A product announcement with five rules | Neither passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.7×took 5.9 s and 2.2 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 13.0×cost $0.0157 and $0.0012 |
| Argue both sides of free buses | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.7×took 9.3 s and 3.4 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 17.7×cost $0.0246 and $0.0014 |
| A discount, then sales tax | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 3.2×took 3.6 s and 1.1 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 11.5×cost $0.0086 and $0.0007 |
| Pens at 3 for $4 | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.5×took 5.4 s and 2.2 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 11.1×cost $0.0159 and $0.0014 |
| Compound interest over three years | Both passed | Closetook 3.6 s and 3.5 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 7.1×cost $0.0092 and $0.0013 |
| Four-digit numbers whose digits sum to 9 | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.6×took 4.6 s and 2.9 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 5.7×cost $0.0139 and $0.0024 |
| The highest of three dice is a 5 | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.6×took 5.9 s and 2.2 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 5.9×cost $0.0106 and $0.0018 |
| An article in three bullets | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.9×took 5.1 s and 1.8 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 15.4×cost $0.0164 and $0.0011 |
| An email thread in one sentence | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.9×took 2.5 s and 1.3 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 15.7×cost $0.0114 and $0.0007 |
| Decisions and action items from a meeting | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 3.3×took 5.6 s and 1.7 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 17.1×cost $0.0182 and $0.0011 |
| A quarterly memo for the CEO | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 3.2×took 5.0 s and 1.5 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 15.2×cost $0.0184 and $0.0012 |
| A study with a negative result | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.4×took 4.9 s and 3.4 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 15.9×cost $0.0160 and $0.0010 |
| The region with the most revenue | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.5×took 4.1 s and 2.7 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 6.1×cost $0.0159 and $0.0026 |
| Average order value in August | Only Claude Fable 5.1 | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.6×took 3.3 s and 2.1 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 9.1×cost $0.0209 and $0.0023 |
| Revenue change from July to August | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.2×took 4.9 s and 4.2 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 10.4×cost $0.0232 and $0.0022 |
| A median, filtered two ways | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 3.4×took 6.7 s and 2.0 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 9.3×cost $0.0151 and $0.0016 |
| Correlation between ad spend and sign-ups | Only Claude Fable 5.1 | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.8×took 14.2 s and 5.0 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 18.0×cost $0.0663 and $0.0037 |
| A late order | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 3.0×took 6.1 s and 2.0 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 14.7×cost $0.0199 and $0.0014 |
| A return inside the window | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.1×took 4.9 s and 2.4 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 13.4×cost $0.0178 and $0.0013 |
| A frustrated customer | Only Claude Fable 5.1 | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.4×took 7.0 s and 3.0 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 14.3×cost $0.0223 and $0.0016 |
| A refund request outside the window | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.7×took 4.5 s and 2.7 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 15.8×cost $0.0204 and $0.0013 |
| A message with a planted instruction | Neither passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.3×took 7.2 s and 3.2 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 16.7×cost $0.0299 and $0.0018 |
| A delivery message into Spanish | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.8×took 4.2 s and 1.5 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 13.9×cost $0.0158 and $0.0011 |
| A product description into French | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 3.7×took 5.1 s and 1.4 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 13.8×cost $0.0158 and $0.0011 |
| A meeting note into German | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.6×took 4.7 s and 1.8 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 14.8×cost $0.0152 and $0.0010 |
| Idioms into natural Japanese | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.5×took 8.5 s and 3.3 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 11.3×cost $0.0217 and $0.0019 |
| A lease clause into Brazilian Portuguese | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.6×took 5.6 s and 3.5 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 8.9×cost $0.0192 and $0.0022 |
| Customers in one country | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.8×took 3.2 s and 1.1 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 18.4×cost $0.0120 and $0.0007 |
| Count orders by status | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 4.3×took 3.5 s and 0.8 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 19.3×cost $0.0122 and $0.0006 |
| Revenue by category | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 3.6×took 4.5 s and 1.2 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 18.0×cost $0.0190 and $0.0011 |
| Every customer, even those without orders | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.5×took 5.2 s and 2.1 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 19.5×cost $0.0199 and $0.0010 |
| Monthly revenue with a running total | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 3.9×took 6.3 s and 1.6 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 18.6×cost $0.0293 and $0.0016 |
| A fact from one section | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 3.3×took 3.5 s and 1.1 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 14.6×cost $0.0134 and $0.0009 |
| Core hours and start times | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 3.3×took 3.7 s and 1.1 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 14.8×cost $0.0135 and $0.0009 |
| Two sections in one answer | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 4.8×took 6.3 s and 1.3 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 12.4×cost $0.0133 and $0.0011 |
| A later amendment changes the answer | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 3.8×took 7.1 s and 1.9 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 13.4×cost $0.0165 and $0.0012 |
| A question the handbook doesn't answer | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 3.4×took 4.0 s and 1.2 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 17.4×cost $0.0160 and $0.0009 |
| Pick the tool and work out the date | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 3.0×took 3.3 s and 1.1 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 12.3×cost $0.0102 and $0.0008 |
| Convert a currency | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 3.5×took 3.5 s and 1.0 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 12.3×cost $0.0103 and $0.0008 |
| Book a meeting from a sentence | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.1×took 2.5 s and 1.2 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 12.5×cost $0.0131 and $0.0010 |
| Search, but don't book | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 4.4×took 5.0 s and 1.1 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 12.2×cost $0.0116 and $0.0010 |
| Two calls with a unit conversion | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 3.9×took 4.8 s and 1.2 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 13.8×cost $0.0145 and $0.0011 |
Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 in our test runs
Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Haiku 4.5 on the same prompts, job by job: how many replies passed their check.
Based on 100 of our test runs on , through OpenRouter with the app's own prompt and settings. Updated .
| Job | Claude Fable 5.1 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Coding | 5 of 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Writing | 3 of 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Math | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Summarization | 3 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Data analysis | 5 of 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Customer support | 4 of 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Translation | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| SQL | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| RAG and answering from documents | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Agents and tool use | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| All jobs | 45 of 50 · 1 message each · $0.0200 a reply | 43 of 50 · 1 message each · $0.0015 a reply |
The same prompts, sent to both through llmwise's own pipeline and checked the same way: five for each job. A bold count is the one that passed more. Messages: what each reply counted as on Pro. Cost: what OpenRouter charged us per reply, on average. Every prompt, and how it's scored.
Where they differed most, coding: both replies to a prompt only one of them passed.
A hard prompt: “Evaluate an arithmetic expression, no eval”, in full.
Claude Fable 5.1
Passed: All 15 tests passed.
```javascript function evaluate(expression) { if (typeof expression !== "string") throw new Error("Expression must be a string"); // ---- Tokenizer ---- const tokens = []; let i = 0; while (i < expression.length) { const ch = expression[i]; if (ch === " " || ch === "\t" || ch === "\n" || ch === "\r") { i++; continue; } if (ch >= "0" && ch <= "9") { let start = i; while (i < expression.length && expression[i] >= "0" && expression[i] <= "9") i++; if (expression[i] === ".") { i++; if (!(expression[i] >= "0" && expression[i] <= "9")) { throw new Error(`Invalid number at position ${start}`); } while (i < expression.length && expression[i] >= "0" && expression[i] <= "9") i++; } tokens.push({ type: "num", value: parseFloat(expression.slice(start, i)), pos: start }); continue; } if ("+-*/^()".includes(ch)) { tokens.push({ type: ch, pos: i }); i++; continue; } throw new Error(`Unexpected character '${ch}' at position ${i}`); } tokens.push({ type: "end", pos: expression.length }); // ---- Parser ---- let p = 0; const peek = () => tokens[p]; const next = () => tokens[p++]; const fail = (tok) => new Error( tok.type === "end" ? "Unexpected end of expression" : `Unexpected token '${tok.type === "num" ? tok.value : tok.type}' at position ${tok.pos}` ); // expr := term (('+'|'-') term)* function parseExpr() { let value = parseTerm(); while (peek().type === "+" || peek().type === "-") { const op = next().type; const rhs = parseTerm(); value = op === "+" ? value + rhs : value - rhs; } return value; } // term := unary (('*'|'/') unary)* function parseTerm() { let value = parseUnary(); while (peek().type === "*" || peek().type === "/") { const op = next().type; const rhs = parseUnary(); value = op === "*" ? value * rhs : value / rhs; } return value; } // unary := '-' unary | power function parseUnary() { if (peek().type === "-") { next(); return -parseUnary(); } return parsePower(); } // power := atom ('^' unary)? (right-associative; exponent may carry unary minus) function parsePower() { const base = parseAtom(); if (peek().type === "^") { next(); const exponent = parseUnary(); return Math.pow(base, exponent); } return base; } // atom := number | '(' expr ')' function parseAtom() { const tok = next(); if (tok.type === "num") return tok.value; if (tok.type === "(") { const value = parseExpr(); const close = next(); if (close.type !== ")") throw fail(close); return value; } throw fail(tok); } const result = parseExpr(); if (peek().type !== "end") throw fail(peek()); return result; } ```762 tokens in, 1,561 out (387 of them reasoning) · 15.7 s · $0.0874 · 1 message on Pro · answered by anthropic/claude-fable-5.1 via Anthropic ·
Claude Haiku 4.5
Failed: 14 of 15 tests passed. First failure: evaluate("-2 ^ 2"): Expected values to be strictly deep-equal:
```javascript function evaluate(expression) { const tokens = tokenize(expression); const parser = new Parser(tokens); const result = parser.parseExpression(); if (parser.pos !== tokens.length) { throw new Error("Unexpected tokens after expression"); } return result; } function tokenize(expression) { const tokens = []; let i = 0; while (i < expression.length) { const ch = expression[i]; if (/\s/.test(ch)) { i++; continue; } if (/\d/.test(ch)) { let num = ''; while (i < expression.length && /[\d.]/.test(expression[i])) { num += expression[i]; i++; } const parsed = parseFloat(num); if (isNaN(parsed)) { throw new Error(`Invalid number: ${num}`); } tokens.push({ type: 'NUMBER', value: parsed }); continue; } if ('+-*/^()'.includes(ch)) { tokens.push({ type: ch, value: ch }); i++; continue; } throw new Error(`Unexpected character: ${ch}`); } return tokens; } class Parser { constructor(tokens) { this.tokens = tokens; this.pos = 0; } peek() { return this.tokens[this.pos]; } consume() { return this.tokens[this.pos++]; } parseExpression() { return this.parseAddSub(); } parseAddSub() { let left = this.parseMulDiv(); while (this.peek() && (this.peek().type === '+' || this.peek().type === '-')) { const op = this.consume().type; const right = this.parseMulDiv(); left = op === '+' ? left + right : left - right; } return left; } parseMulDiv() { let left = this.parsePower(); while (this.peek() && (this.peek().type === '*' || this.peek().type === '/')) { const op = this.consume().type; const right = this.parsePower(); left = op === '*' ? left * right : left / right; } return left; } parsePower() { let left = this.parseUnary(); if (this.peek() && this.peek().type === '^') { this.consume(); const right = this.parsePower(); left = Math.pow(left, right); } return left; } parseUnary() { if (this.peek() && this.peek().type === '-') { this.consume(); return -this.parseUnary(); } if (this.peek() && this.peek().type === '+') { this.consume(); return this.parseUnary(); } return this.parsePrimary(); } parsePrimary() { const token = this.peek(); if (!token) { throw new Error("Unexpected end of expression"); } if (token.type === 'NUMBER') { this.consume(); return token.value; } if (token.type === '(') { this.consume(); const result = this.parseExpression(); if (!this.peek() || this.peek().type !== ')') { throw new Error("Missing closing parenthesis"); } this.consume(); return result; } throw new Error(`Unexpected token: ${token.value}`); } } ```599 tokens in, 1,007 out · 7.6 s · $0.0056 · 1 message on Pro · answered by anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 via Amazon Bedrock ·
Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Haiku 4.5 on every plan
Whether the one-time free trial reaches each model, then each paid plan's messages on it.
| Plan | Price | Claude Fable 5.1 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | Not in the trial | In the one-time trial of 5 messages |
| Pro | $20 a month | Up to 31 a month | Up to 250 a month |
| Max | $50 a month | Up to 100 a month | Up to 800 a month |
| Ultra | $100 a month | Up to 225 a month | Up to 1,800 a month |
| Studio | $200 a month | Up to 500 a month | Up to 4,000 a month |
Prices don't include tax, which is added where it applies and shown before you pay. A paid plan's month is one allowance shared by every model, so each monthly count is the most you get if all of it goes to that model. It renews each billing period; everyday models refill daily at 00:00 UTC. Long chats count more per reply. How pricing works.
Every limit is published. Paid plans also have a monthly fair-use limit on AI cost: Pro $7.50, Max $20, Ultra $42, Studio $85. Using every message on your plan at typical sizes stays under it; very large messages and heavy research use it faster. Every limit, explained.
What differs
Messages on Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 gets eight times as many messages: up to 250 messages a month on Pro, against up to 31 messages a month for Claude Fable 5.1.
Context window
Claude Fable 5.1 takes up to 1M tokens; Claude Haiku 4.5 up to 200K tokens. A chat in llmwise holds up to 200k tokens, which fits in either, so the difference shows only through each maker's own API.
Images and PDFs
Both read images. Both take a PDF as the whole file, pages and all.
On Free
Claude Haiku 4.5 is in the free trial; Claude Fable 5.1 needs a paid plan.
Where messages go
Both are Claude models, served the same way. Sent to Anthropic directly.
Fact by fact
| Fact | Claude Fable 5.1 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 200K tokens |
| Reads images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Whole file | Whole file |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| API price (September 2026) | $10.00 in / $50.00 out per million tokens | $1.00 in / $5.00 out per million tokens |
| A typical message at API prices (4,000 tokens in, 700 out) | $0.0750 | $0.0075 |
| A $10 top-up adds | 25 messages | 200 messages |
| Where a message goes | Sent to Anthropic directly. | Sent to Anthropic directly. |
| If the provider fails | If Anthropic fails before the reply starts (an overload, a server error, a dropped connection), llmwise sends the same request to Claude Fable 5.1 through OpenRouter instead. | If Anthropic fails before the reply starts (an overload, a server error, a dropped connection), llmwise sends the same request to Claude Haiku 4.5 through OpenRouter instead. |
| Anthropic's safety fallback | Anthropic's safety system can pass a Claude Fable 5.1 message to another Claude model. The reply then names the model that answered and says what you were charged for. | Doesn't apply |
Claude Fable 5.1 or Claude Haiku 4.5?
From the facts above and our test runs: the rest is how their answers suit your work, which one chat can show you.
Pick Claude Haiku 4.5: more messages for the money, up to 250 messages a month on Pro; you can try it in the free trial.
Each model's page, the families, and other pairs
Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 is one pair of models. The pages below cover the whole family.
- Claude Fable 5.1: price, limits and messages on every plan
- Claude Haiku 4.5: price, limits and messages on every plan
- Claude playground: try Claude online
- Is Claude Fable 5.1 included in Claude Pro?
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Haiku 4.5
- Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Haiku 4.5
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-6 Sol
- Every model-vs-model page
Both are made by the same company, so they're served the same way.
Questions
Is Claude Fable 5.1 or Claude Haiku 4.5 cheaper in llmwise?
Claude Haiku 4.5 gets eight times as many messages: up to 250 messages a month on Pro, against up to 31 messages a month for Claude Fable 5.1. Every paid plan's monthly allowance is shared by all models, so each count is the most you get if it all goes to that model.
Can I try Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Haiku 4.5 for free?
Claude Haiku 4.5 is, in the free trial of 5 messages; Claude Fable 5.1 needs a paid plan.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Fable 5.1 or Claude Haiku 4.5?
Claude Fable 5.1: 1M tokens, against 200K tokens. A chat in llmwise holds up to 200k tokens, which fits in either, so the difference shows only through each maker's own API.
Can I use Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Haiku 4.5 in the same chat?
Yes. Pick Claude Fable 5.1 for one message and Claude Haiku 4.5 for the next; the second sees the whole chat, including the first one's answer.
Which did better in your test runs, Claude Fable 5.1 or Claude Haiku 4.5?
On the same 50 prompts, run on September 27, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 passed 45 and Claude Haiku 4.5 passed 43. The table on this page has each job, and every reply is published.
Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Kimi, and GLM, in one chat.
See what a message costs before you send it. Free is 5 messages to try; sign in with an email link, no password or card.