Model vs model
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro are both in llmwise. What each gets on every plan, what it reads, how it's served and what happens when its provider fails, from the catalog and the code that runs them.
Model prices and specs checked against OpenRouter's Claude Haiku 4.5 page, OpenRouter's DeepSeek V4 Pro page. Updated .
Short answer
They cost the same in llmwise: up to 250 messages a month on Pro on either. Otherwise, only Claude Haiku 4.5 reads images and only Claude Haiku 4.5 reads a PDF as the whole file. In our test runs, Claude Haiku 4.5 passed 43 of the 50 prompts both answered and DeepSeek V4 Pro 49; 6 prompts split them, most on coding (3 to 5).
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro, prompt by prompt
Every prompt Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro both answered, compared directly, their biggest differences first. One run each, through OpenRouter: a wait depends on the provider and the load that day, so a lead under 10% counts as close.
Of the 50 prompts both answered, both passed 43, only Claude Haiku 4.5 passed 0, only DeepSeek V4 Pro passed 6, and neither passed 1. Claude Haiku 4.5 answered sooner on 35 of the 50 and DeepSeek V4 Pro on 7; the rest were within 10% of each other. The 50 replies cost $0.0741 on Claude Haiku 4.5 and $0.1827 on DeepSeek V4 Pro: 2.5× less on Claude Haiku 4.5.
The 6 prompts only one of Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro passed
Evaluate an arithmetic expression, no eval (coding): DeepSeek V4 Pro passed and Claude Haiku 4.5 didn't. Claude Haiku 4.5: 14 of 15 tests passed. First failure: evaluate("-2 ^ 2"): Expected values to be strictly deep-equal: DeepSeek V4 Pro: All 15 tests passed.
Parse CSV with quoted fields (coding): DeepSeek V4 Pro passed and Claude Haiku 4.5 didn't. Claude Haiku 4.5: 5 of 8 tests passed. First failure: parseCsv('"line1\nline2",end\r\nnext,row\r\n'): Expected values to be strictly deep-equal: DeepSeek V4 Pro: All 8 tests passed.
A product announcement with five rules (writing): DeepSeek V4 Pro passed and Claude Haiku 4.5 didn't. Claude Haiku 4.5: Graded 3.7 of 5 on average (lowest 3). DeepSeek V4 Pro: Graded 4.3 of 5 on average (lowest 4).
Average order value in August (data analysis): DeepSeek V4 Pro passed and Claude Haiku 4.5 didn't. Claude Haiku 4.5: Final answer 275.00; expected 300. DeepSeek V4 Pro: Final answer 300.00: right.
Correlation between ad spend and sign-ups (data analysis): DeepSeek V4 Pro passed and Claude Haiku 4.5 didn't. Claude Haiku 4.5: Final answer 0.99; expected 0.97. DeepSeek V4 Pro: Final answer 0.97: right.
A message with a planted instruction (customer support): DeepSeek V4 Pro passed and Claude Haiku 4.5 didn't. Claude Haiku 4.5: Graded 4.3 of 5 on average (lowest 3); but 165 words, over the 150 allowed. DeepSeek V4 Pro: Graded 4.3 of 5 on average (lowest 4).
Job by job, the widest gaps first
Coding: Claude Haiku 4.5 passed 3 of 5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 5 of 5. Claude Haiku 4.5 answered 51.0× sooner at the median, 2.3 s against 119.6 s. Claude Haiku 4.5 cost 8.7× less, $0.0137 against $0.1200 for the 5 replies. Claude Haiku 4.5's replies ran 63% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Data analysis: Claude Haiku 4.5 passed 3 of 5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 5 of 5. Claude Haiku 4.5 answered 1.5× sooner at the median, 2.7 s against 4.1 s. Claude Haiku 4.5 cost 1.1× less, $0.0125 against $0.0143 for the 5 replies. Claude Haiku 4.5's replies ran 204% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Writing: Claude Haiku 4.5 passed 4 of 5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 5 of 5. Claude Haiku 4.5 answered 1.8× sooner at the median, 2.2 s against 3.9 s. They cost about the same, $0.0057 against $0.0054 for the 5 replies. Claude Haiku 4.5's replies ran 33% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Customer support: Claude Haiku 4.5 passed 3 of 5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 4 of 5. Claude Haiku 4.5 answered 1.5× sooner at the median, 2.7 s against 4.1 s. They cost about the same, $0.0073 against $0.0077 for the 5 replies. Claude Haiku 4.5's replies ran 62% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
SQL: Claude Haiku 4.5 passed 5 of 5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 5 of 5. Claude Haiku 4.5 answered 6.5× sooner at the median, 1.2 s against 8.0 s. Claude Haiku 4.5 cost 2.1× less, $0.0049 against $0.0101 for the 5 replies. Claude Haiku 4.5's replies ran 12% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Math: Claude Haiku 4.5 passed 5 of 5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 5 of 5. Claude Haiku 4.5 answered 1.2× sooner at the median, 2.2 s against 2.7 s. DeepSeek V4 Pro cost 1.8× less, $0.0077 against $0.0044 for the 5 replies. Claude Haiku 4.5's replies ran 190% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
RAG and answering from documents: Claude Haiku 4.5 passed 5 of 5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 5 of 5. Claude Haiku 4.5 answered 1.7× sooner at the median, 1.2 s against 2.1 s. DeepSeek V4 Pro cost 1.7× less, $0.0050 against $0.0030 for the 5 replies. Claude Haiku 4.5's replies ran 140% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Agents and tool use: Claude Haiku 4.5 passed 5 of 5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 5 of 5. Claude Haiku 4.5 answered 1.4× sooner at the median, 1.1 s against 1.6 s. DeepSeek V4 Pro cost 1.4× less, $0.0047 against $0.0033 for the 5 replies. Claude Haiku 4.5's replies ran 68% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Translation: Claude Haiku 4.5 passed 5 of 5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 5 of 5. Claude Haiku 4.5 answered 2.3× sooner at the median, 1.8 s against 4.3 s. Claude Haiku 4.5 cost 1.3× less, $0.0074 against $0.0100 for the 5 replies. Claude Haiku 4.5's replies ran 80% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Summarization: Claude Haiku 4.5 passed 5 of 5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 5 of 5. Claude Haiku 4.5 answered 1.2× sooner at the median, 1.7 s against 2.1 s. DeepSeek V4 Pro cost 1.1× less, $0.0051 against $0.0046 for the 5 replies. Claude Haiku 4.5's replies ran 12% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
All 50 prompts: who passed, who answered sooner, who cost less
| Prompt | Result | Sooner | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turn a title into a URL slug | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.6×took 1.5 s and 3.9 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.5×cost $0.0010 and $0.0015 |
| Parse a duration like “1h 30m” | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 51.0×took 2.3 s and 119.6 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 16.9×cost $0.0022 and $0.0366 |
| Merge overlapping intervals | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 3.5×took 2.0 s and 6.8 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.3×cost $0.0017 and $0.0021 |
| Evaluate an arithmetic expression, no eval | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro | Claude Haiku 4.5, 19.3×took 7.6 s and 145.7 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 7.8×cost $0.0056 and $0.0440 |
| Parse CSV with quoted fields | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro | Claude Haiku 4.5, 35.1×took 3.5 s and 122.3 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 10.8×cost $0.0033 and $0.0357 |
| Announce a second bakery shop on LinkedIn | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.5×took 2.6 s and 3.9 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.3×cost $0.0013 and $0.0010 |
| Rewrite corporate jargon in plain words | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 3.6×took 1.6 s and 5.8 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.9×cost $0.0008 and $0.0024 |
| Decline a meeting and offer two times | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.6×took 2.0 s and 3.3 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.7×cost $0.0010 and $0.0006 |
| A product announcement with five rules | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.2×took 2.2 s and 1.8 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 2.4×cost $0.0012 and $0.0005 |
| Argue both sides of free buses | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.2×took 3.4 s and 4.1 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.6×cost $0.0014 and $0.0009 |
| A discount, then sales tax | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.6×took 1.1 s and 1.8 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.5×cost $0.0007 and $0.0005 |
| Pens at 3 for $4 | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.3×took 2.2 s and 2.7 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.4×cost $0.0014 and $0.0010 |
| Compound interest over three years | Both passed | Closetook 3.5 s and 3.4 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.7×cost $0.0013 and $0.0008 |
| Four-digit numbers whose digits sum to 9 | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.4×took 2.9 s and 4.0 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 2.1×cost $0.0024 and $0.0012 |
| The highest of three dice is a 5 | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.1×took 2.2 s and 2.5 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 2.0×cost $0.0018 and $0.0009 |
| An article in three bullets | Both passed | Closetook 1.8 s and 1.8 s | Closecost $0.0011 and $0.0010 |
| An email thread in one sentence | Both passed | Closetook 1.3 s and 1.2 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.4×cost $0.0007 and $0.0005 |
| Decisions and action items from a meeting | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 3.2×took 1.7 s and 5.4 s | Closecost $0.0011 and $0.0011 |
| A quarterly memo for the CEO | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.5×took 1.5 s and 2.3 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.2×cost $0.0012 and $0.0014 |
| A study with a negative result | Both passed | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.6×took 3.4 s and 2.1 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.9×cost $0.0010 and $0.0005 |
| The region with the most revenue | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.5×took 2.7 s and 4.1 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.3×cost $0.0026 and $0.0020 |
| Average order value in August | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro | Closetook 2.1 s and 2.2 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.9×cost $0.0023 and $0.0012 |
| Revenue change from July to August | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.2×took 4.2 s and 5.2 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.1×cost $0.0022 and $0.0020 |
| A median, filtered two ways | Both passed | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.7×took 2.0 s and 1.2 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.6×cost $0.0016 and $0.0011 |
| Correlation between ad spend and sign-ups | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.6×took 5.0 s and 8.1 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.2×cost $0.0037 and $0.0081 |
| A late order | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.0×took 2.0 s and 4.1 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.7×cost $0.0014 and $0.0023 |
| A return inside the window | Both passed | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.8×took 2.4 s and 1.3 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 2.0×cost $0.0013 and $0.0007 |
| A frustrated customer | Neither passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 3.2×took 3.0 s and 9.5 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.1×cost $0.0016 and $0.0018 |
| A refund request outside the window | Both passed | Closetook 2.7 s and 2.5 s | Closecost $0.0013 and $0.0012 |
| A message with a planted instruction | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.1×took 3.2 s and 6.7 s | Closecost $0.0018 and $0.0017 |
| A delivery message into Spanish | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 5.8×took 1.5 s and 8.8 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 3.9×cost $0.0011 and $0.0044 |
| A product description into French | Both passed | Closetook 1.4 s and 1.3 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.8×cost $0.0011 and $0.0006 |
| A meeting note into German | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.3×took 1.8 s and 4.3 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.4×cost $0.0010 and $0.0015 |
| Idioms into natural Japanese | Both passed | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.2×took 3.3 s and 2.7 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.7×cost $0.0019 and $0.0011 |
| A lease clause into Brazilian Portuguese | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 4.7×took 3.5 s and 16.4 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.1×cost $0.0022 and $0.0024 |
| Customers in one country | Both passed | Closetook 1.1 s and 1.2 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.7×cost $0.0007 and $0.0004 |
| Count orders by status | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.3×took 0.8 s and 1.1 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.6×cost $0.0006 and $0.0004 |
| Revenue by category | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 6.5×took 1.2 s and 8.0 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.4×cost $0.0011 and $0.0025 |
| Every customer, even those without orders | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 4.9×took 2.1 s and 10.4 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 3.2×cost $0.0010 and $0.0032 |
| Monthly revenue with a running total | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 10.2×took 1.6 s and 16.6 s | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.3×cost $0.0016 and $0.0036 |
| A fact from one section | Both passed | Closetook 1.1 s and 1.1 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.9×cost $0.0009 and $0.0005 |
| Core hours and start times | Both passed | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.4×took 1.1 s and 0.8 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 2.5×cost $0.0009 and $0.0004 |
| Two sections in one answer | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.6×took 1.3 s and 2.1 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.4×cost $0.0011 and $0.0008 |
| A later amendment changes the answer | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.3×took 1.9 s and 2.5 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.4×cost $0.0012 and $0.0009 |
| A question the handbook doesn't answer | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 7.4×took 1.2 s and 8.8 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.8×cost $0.0009 and $0.0005 |
| Pick the tool and work out the date | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.5×took 1.1 s and 1.6 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.6×cost $0.0008 and $0.0005 |
| Convert a currency | Both passed | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.1×took 1.0 s and 0.9 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 2.0×cost $0.0008 and $0.0004 |
| Book a meeting from a sentence | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.9×took 1.2 s and 2.3 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.2×cost $0.0010 and $0.0008 |
| Search, but don't book | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.3×took 1.1 s and 1.4 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.4×cost $0.0010 and $0.0007 |
| Two calls with a unit conversion | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 3.0×took 1.2 s and 3.7 s | DeepSeek V4 Pro, 1.3×cost $0.0011 and $0.0008 |
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro in our test runs
Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro on the same prompts, job by job: how many replies passed their check.
Based on 100 of our test runs on , through OpenRouter with the app's own prompt and settings. Updated .
| Job | Claude Haiku 4.5 | DeepSeek V4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Coding | 3 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Writing | 4 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Math | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Summarization | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Data analysis | 3 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Customer support | 3 of 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Translation | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| SQL | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| RAG and answering from documents | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Agents and tool use | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| All jobs | 43 of 50 · 1 message each · $0.0015 a reply | 49 of 50 · 1 message each · $0.0037 a reply |
The same prompts, sent to both through llmwise's own pipeline and checked the same way: five for each job. A bold count is the one that passed more. Messages: what each reply counted as on Pro. Cost: what OpenRouter charged us per reply, on average. Every prompt, and how it's scored.
Where they differed most, coding: both replies to a prompt only one of them passed.
A hard prompt: “Evaluate an arithmetic expression, no eval”, in full.
Claude Haiku 4.5
Failed: 14 of 15 tests passed. First failure: evaluate("-2 ^ 2"): Expected values to be strictly deep-equal:
```javascript function evaluate(expression) { const tokens = tokenize(expression); const parser = new Parser(tokens); const result = parser.parseExpression(); if (parser.pos !== tokens.length) { throw new Error("Unexpected tokens after expression"); } return result; } function tokenize(expression) { const tokens = []; let i = 0; while (i < expression.length) { const ch = expression[i]; if (/\s/.test(ch)) { i++; continue; } if (/\d/.test(ch)) { let num = ''; while (i < expression.length && /[\d.]/.test(expression[i])) { num += expression[i]; i++; } const parsed = parseFloat(num); if (isNaN(parsed)) { throw new Error(`Invalid number: ${num}`); } tokens.push({ type: 'NUMBER', value: parsed }); continue; } if ('+-*/^()'.includes(ch)) { tokens.push({ type: ch, value: ch }); i++; continue; } throw new Error(`Unexpected character: ${ch}`); } return tokens; } class Parser { constructor(tokens) { this.tokens = tokens; this.pos = 0; } peek() { return this.tokens[this.pos]; } consume() { return this.tokens[this.pos++]; } parseExpression() { return this.parseAddSub(); } parseAddSub() { let left = this.parseMulDiv(); while (this.peek() && (this.peek().type === '+' || this.peek().type === '-')) { const op = this.consume().type; const right = this.parseMulDiv(); left = op === '+' ? left + right : left - right; } return left; } parseMulDiv() { let left = this.parsePower(); while (this.peek() && (this.peek().type === '*' || this.peek().type === '/')) { const op = this.consume().type; const right = this.parsePower(); left = op === '*' ? left * right : left / right; } return left; } parsePower() { let left = this.parseUnary(); if (this.peek() && this.peek().type === '^') { this.consume(); const right = this.parsePower(); left = Math.pow(left, right); } return left; } parseUnary() { if (this.peek() && this.peek().type === '-') { this.consume(); return -this.parseUnary(); } if (this.peek() && this.peek().type === '+') { this.consume(); return this.parseUnary(); } return this.parsePrimary(); } parsePrimary() { const token = this.peek(); if (!token) { throw new Error("Unexpected end of expression"); } if (token.type === 'NUMBER') { this.consume(); return token.value; } if (token.type === '(') { this.consume(); const result = this.parseExpression(); if (!this.peek() || this.peek().type !== ')') { throw new Error("Missing closing parenthesis"); } this.consume(); return result; } throw new Error(`Unexpected token: ${token.value}`); } } ```599 tokens in, 1,007 out · 7.6 s · $0.0056 · 1 message on Pro · answered by anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 via Amazon Bedrock ·
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Passed: All 15 tests passed.
```javascript function evaluate(expression) { const s = expression; let i = 0; function skipSpaces() { while (i < s.length && s[i] === ' ') i++; } function isDigit(c) { return c >= '0' && c <= '9'; } function parsePrimary() { skipSpaces(); if (i >= s.length) { throw new Error('Unexpected end of input'); } const ch = s[i]; if (ch === '(') { i++; const value = parseAdd(); skipSpaces(); if (i >= s.length || s[i] !== ')') { throw new Error("Expected ')'"); } i++; return value; } if (isDigit(ch)) { return parseNumber(); } throw new Error('Unexpected token: ' + ch); } function parseNumber() { const start = i; while (i < s.length && isDigit(s[i])) i++; if (i < s.length && s[i] === '.') { i++; if (i >= s.length || !isDigit(s[i])) { throw new Error('Invalid number'); } while (i < s.length && isDigit(s[i])) i++; } return Number(s.slice(start, i)); } function parseUnary() { skipSpaces(); if (i < s.length && s[i] === '-') { i++; return -parseUnary(); } return parsePower(); } function parsePower() { const base = parsePrimary(); skipSpaces(); if (i < s.length && s[i] === '^') { i++; const exponent = parseUnary(); return base ** exponent; } return base; } function parseMul() { let left = parseUnary(); skipSpaces(); while (i < s.length && (s[i] === '*' || s[i] === '/')) { const op = s[i++]; const right = parseUnary(); if (op === '*') left *= right; else left /= right; skipSpaces(); } return left; } function parseAdd() { let left = parseMul(); skipSpaces(); while (i < s.length && (s[i] === '+' || s[i] === '-')) { const op = s[i++]; const right = parseMul(); if (op === '+') left += right; else left -= right; skipSpaces(); } return left; } skipSpaces(); const result = parseAdd(); skipSpaces(); if (i !== s.length) { throw new Error('Unexpected token: ' + s[i]); } return result; } ```563 tokens in, 10,967 out (10,346 of them reasoning) · 145.7 s · $0.0440 · 1 message on Pro · answered by deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813 via Wafer ·
Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro on every plan
Whether the one-time free trial reaches each model, then each paid plan's messages on it.
| Plan | Price | Claude Haiku 4.5 | DeepSeek V4 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | Not in the trial | Not in the trial |
| Plus | $10 a month | Up to 125 a month | Up to 125 a month |
| Pro | $20 a month | Up to 250 a month | Up to 250 a month |
| Max | $50 a month | Up to 800 a month | Up to 800 a month |
| Ultra | $100 a month | Up to 1,800 a month | Up to 1,800 a month |
| Studio | $200 a month | Up to 4,000 a month | Up to 4,000 a month |
Prices don't include tax, which is added where it applies and shown before you pay. A paid plan's month is one allowance shared by every model, so each monthly count is the most you get if all of it goes to that model. It renews each billing period; everyday models refill daily at 00:00 UTC. Long chats count more per reply. How pricing works.
Every limit is published. Paid plans also have a monthly fair-use limit on AI cost: Plus $3.75, Pro $7.50, Max $20, Ultra $42, Studio $85. Using every message on your plan at typical sizes stays under it; very large messages and heavy research use it faster. Every limit, explained.
What differs
Messages on Pro
They cost the same in llmwise: up to 250 messages a month on Pro on either.
Context window
Claude Haiku 4.5 takes up to 200K tokens; DeepSeek V4 Pro up to 1.05M tokens. A chat in llmwise holds up to 200k tokens, which fits in either, so the difference shows only through each maker's own API.
Images and PDFs
DeepSeek V4 Pro doesn't read images. DeepSeek V4 Pro gets a PDF's text rather than the file itself.
On Free
Neither is in the free trial: both need a paid plan, from Plus.
Where messages go
Claude Haiku 4.5: Sent to Anthropic directly. DeepSeek V4 Pro: Served through OpenRouter, only by hosts that don't store or train on prompts. The maker's own endpoint is never asked.
Fact by fact
| Fact | Claude Haiku 4.5 | DeepSeek V4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 200K tokens | 1.05M tokens |
| Reads images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | Whole file | Text only |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| API price (October 2026) | $1.00 in / $5.00 out per million tokens | $0.40 in / $4.00 out per million tokens |
| A typical message at API prices (4,000 tokens in, 700 out) | $0.0075 | $0.0044 |
| A $10 top-up adds | 200 messages | 200 messages |
| Where a message goes | Sent to Anthropic directly. | Served through OpenRouter, only by hosts that don't store or train on prompts. The maker's own endpoint is never asked. |
| If the provider fails | If Anthropic fails before the reply starts (an overload, a server error, a dropped connection), llmwise sends the same request to Claude Haiku 4.5 through OpenRouter instead. | When one host is down, OpenRouter moves the request to another host that meets the same rules. |
| Anthropic's safety fallback | Doesn't apply | Doesn't apply |
Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?
From the facts above and our test runs: the rest is how their answers suit your work, which one chat can show you.
Pick Claude Haiku 4.5: it reads images; it reads a PDF as the whole file, charts and scans included.
Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro: it costs its maker less to run ($0.0044 a typical message at API prices), though in llmwise the count is the same.
Each model's page, the families, and other pairs
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro is one pair of models. The page below covers the whole families.
- Claude Haiku 4.5: price, limits and messages on every plan
- DeepSeek V4 Pro: price, limits and messages on every plan
- DeepSeek vs Claude
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Haiku 4.5
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Haiku 4.5
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Haiku 4.5
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
- DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Kimi K3
- DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.3
- Every model-vs-model page
Claude Haiku 4.5 is a Claude model; DeepSeek V4 Pro is a DeepSeek model.
Questions
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro cheaper in llmwise?
They cost the same in llmwise: up to 250 messages a month on Pro on either. Every paid plan's monthly allowance is shared by the models on it, so each count is the most you get if it all goes to that model.
Can I try Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro for free?
Neither is in the free trial of 5 messages: both need a paid plan, from Plus.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 1.05M tokens, against 200K tokens. A chat in llmwise holds up to 200k tokens, which fits in either, so the difference shows only through each maker's own API.
Can I use Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro in the same chat?
Yes. Pick Claude Haiku 4.5 for one message and DeepSeek V4 Pro for the next; the second sees the whole chat, including the first one's answer.
Which did better in your test runs, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?
On the same 50 prompts, run on October 8, 2026, Claude Haiku 4.5 passed 43 and DeepSeek V4 Pro passed 49. The table on this page has each job, and every reply is published.
Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Kimi, GLM, and Mistral, in one chat.
See what a message costs before you send it. Free is 5 messages to try; sign in with an email link, no password or card.