Model vs model
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Grok 4.7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Grok 4.7 are both in llmwise. What each gets on every plan, what it reads, how it's served and what happens when its provider fails, from the catalog and the code that runs them.
Model prices and specs checked against OpenRouter's DeepSeek V4.1 Flash page, OpenRouter's Grok 4.7 page. Updated .
Short answer
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is an everyday model (60 messages a day on Pro); Grok 4.7 draws on the monthly allowance (up to 250 messages a month on Pro). Otherwise, only Grok 4.7 reads a PDF as the whole file. In our test runs, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash passed 48 of the 50 prompts both answered and Grok 4.7 47; 3 prompts split them, most on writing (4 to 3).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Grok 4.7, prompt by prompt
Every prompt DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Grok 4.7 both answered, compared directly, their biggest differences first. One run each, through OpenRouter: a wait depends on the provider and the load that day, so a lead under 10% counts as close.
Of the 50 prompts both answered, both passed 46, only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash passed 2, only Grok 4.7 passed 1, and neither passed 1. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash answered sooner on 50 of the 50 and Grok 4.7 on 0; the rest were within 10% of each other. The 50 replies cost $0.0260 on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and $0.3875 on Grok 4.7: 14.9× less on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash.
The 3 prompts only one of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Grok 4.7 passed
Argue both sides of free buses (writing): DeepSeek V4.1 Flash passed and Grok 4.7 didn't. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Graded 4.3 of 5 on average (lowest 4). Grok 4.7: Graded 4.7 of 5 on average (lowest 4); but a paragraph of 100 words, over the 90 allowed.
A frustrated customer (customer support): DeepSeek V4.1 Flash passed and Grok 4.7 didn't. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Graded 4.7 of 5 on average (lowest 4). Grok 4.7: Graded 3.7 of 5 on average (lowest 3).
A message with a planted instruction (customer support): Grok 4.7 passed and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash didn't. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Graded 4.7 of 5 on average (lowest 4); but 198 words, over the 150 allowed. Grok 4.7: Graded 4.7 of 5 on average (lowest 4).
Job by job, the widest gaps first
Writing: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash passed 4 of 5 and Grok 4.7 3 of 5. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash answered 4.5× sooner at the median, 1.3 s against 6.0 s. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost 12.8× less, $0.0023 against $0.0288 for the 5 replies. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's replies ran 20% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Math: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash passed 5 of 5 and Grok 4.7 5 of 5. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash answered 12.6× sooner at the median, 0.9 s against 11.7 s. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost 28.9× less, $0.0012 against $0.0362 for the 5 replies. Grok 4.7's replies ran 45% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
SQL: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash passed 5 of 5 and Grok 4.7 5 of 5. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash answered 7.3× sooner at the median, 0.4 s against 3.0 s. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost 23.8× less, $0.0010 against $0.0240 for the 5 replies. Their replies ran to about the same length.
Agents and tool use: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash passed 5 of 5 and Grok 4.7 5 of 5. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash answered 14.7× sooner at the median, 0.4 s against 5.2 s. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost 19.3× less, $0.0010 against $0.0197 for the 5 replies. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's replies ran 12% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
RAG and answering from documents: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash passed 5 of 5 and Grok 4.7 5 of 5. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash answered 5.7× sooner at the median, 0.3 s against 1.9 s. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost 17.4× less, $0.0008 against $0.0146 for the 5 replies. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's replies ran 174% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Translation: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash passed 5 of 5 and Grok 4.7 5 of 5. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash answered 8.0× sooner at the median, 1.3 s against 10.7 s. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost 14.1× less, $0.0029 against $0.0410 for the 5 replies. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's replies ran 75% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Summarization: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash passed 5 of 5 and Grok 4.7 5 of 5. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash answered 5.4× sooner at the median, 0.5 s against 2.8 s. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost 14.0× less, $0.0010 against $0.0141 for the 5 replies. Their replies ran to about the same length.
Coding: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash passed 5 of 5 and Grok 4.7 5 of 5. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash answered 12.7× sooner at the median, 2.5 s against 31.6 s. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost 13.4× less, $0.0092 against $0.1229 for the 5 replies. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's replies ran 34% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Customer support: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash passed 4 of 5 and Grok 4.7 4 of 5. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash answered 9.2× sooner at the median, 1.3 s against 11.6 s. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost 13.3× less, $0.0023 against $0.0306 for the 5 replies. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's replies ran 71% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Data analysis: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash passed 5 of 5 and Grok 4.7 5 of 5. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash answered 10.3× sooner at the median, 0.9 s against 8.9 s. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost 13.1× less, $0.0042 against $0.0556 for the 5 replies. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's replies ran 28% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
All 50 prompts: who passed, who answered sooner, who cost less
| Prompt | Result | Sooner | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turn a title into a URL slug | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 11.1×took 1.3 s and 14.3 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 18.9×cost $0.0004 and $0.0078 |
| Parse a duration like “1h 30m” | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 12.7×took 2.5 s and 31.6 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 14.6×cost $0.0011 and $0.0167 |
| Merge overlapping intervals | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 9.7×took 0.6 s and 6.1 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 13.7×cost $0.0003 and $0.0045 |
| Evaluate an arithmetic expression, no eval | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 18.9×took 5.8 s and 110.1 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 18.9×cost $0.0030 and $0.0574 |
| Parse CSV with quoted fields | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 7.9×took 9.1 s and 72.2 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 8.6×cost $0.0042 and $0.0364 |
| Announce a second bakery shop on LinkedIn | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 12.0×took 1.3 s and 16.1 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 25.1×cost $0.0004 and $0.0093 |
| Rewrite corporate jargon in plain words | Neither passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 22.6×took 0.9 s and 20.0 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 37.8×cost $0.0003 and $0.0112 |
| Decline a meeting and offer two times | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 1.1×took 2.2 s and 2.5 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 11.0×cost $0.0002 and $0.0024 |
| A product announcement with five rules | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 3.0×took 0.8 s and 2.5 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 8.7×cost $0.0003 and $0.0025 |
| Argue both sides of free buses | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 2.3×took 2.6 s and 6.0 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 3.1×cost $0.0011 and $0.0034 |
| A discount, then sales tax | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 6.7×took 0.7 s and 4.8 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 24.8×cost $0.0001 and $0.0033 |
| Pens at 3 for $4 | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 19.9×took 0.9 s and 18.5 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 27.4×cost $0.0004 and $0.0111 |
| Compound interest over three years | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 3.8×took 2.1 s and 8.0 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 26.6×cost $0.0002 and $0.0051 |
| Four-digit numbers whose digits sum to 9 | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 22.1×took 0.7 s and 15.1 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 32.6×cost $0.0003 and $0.0093 |
| The highest of three dice is a 5 | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 11.4×took 1.0 s and 11.7 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 31.4×cost $0.0002 and $0.0074 |
| An article in three bullets | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 5.0×took 0.5 s and 2.6 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 12.2×cost $0.0002 and $0.0025 |
| An email thread in one sentence | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 6.6×took 0.4 s and 2.8 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 17.0×cost $0.0001 and $0.0021 |
| Decisions and action items from a meeting | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 2.2×took 2.4 s and 5.3 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 17.4×cost $0.0002 and $0.0036 |
| A quarterly memo for the CEO | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 9.2×took 0.4 s and 4.0 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 13.5×cost $0.0003 and $0.0035 |
| A study with a negative result | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 5.4×took 0.5 s and 2.8 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 11.5×cost $0.0002 and $0.0024 |
| The region with the most revenue | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 11.6×took 0.8 s and 8.9 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 13.3×cost $0.0005 and $0.0067 |
| Average order value in August | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 10.6×took 0.9 s and 9.1 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 16.1×cost $0.0004 and $0.0072 |
| Revenue change from July to August | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 6.9×took 1.1 s and 7.7 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 10.7×cost $0.0007 and $0.0074 |
| A median, filtered two ways | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 7.1×took 0.6 s and 4.4 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 11.9×cost $0.0003 and $0.0037 |
| Correlation between ad spend and sign-ups | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 8.7×took 5.8 s and 50.5 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 13.4×cost $0.0023 and $0.0306 |
| A late order | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 13.1×took 1.3 s and 17.5 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 17.1×cost $0.0005 and $0.0084 |
| A return inside the window | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 5.2×took 0.9 s and 4.8 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 14.0×cost $0.0003 and $0.0039 |
| A frustrated customer | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 9.2×took 1.3 s and 11.6 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 16.4×cost $0.0005 and $0.0075 |
| A refund request outside the window | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 3.4×took 1.1 s and 3.6 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 10.8×cost $0.0003 and $0.0034 |
| A message with a planted instruction | Only Grok 4.7 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 5.2×took 2.3 s and 11.7 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 9.7×cost $0.0008 and $0.0075 |
| A delivery message into Spanish | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 11.0×took 0.9 s and 10.2 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 20.1×cost $0.0003 and $0.0068 |
| A product description into French | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 7.5×took 2.1 s and 15.7 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 10.5×cost $0.0009 and $0.0095 |
| A meeting note into German | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 16.7×took 1.3 s and 22.4 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 22.1×cost $0.0005 and $0.0121 |
| Idioms into natural Japanese | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 6.2×took 1.7 s and 10.7 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 10.3×cost $0.0006 and $0.0062 |
| A lease clause into Brazilian Portuguese | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 9.2×took 1.1 s and 9.8 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 12.8×cost $0.0005 and $0.0064 |
| Customers in one country | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 5.6×took 0.3 s and 1.5 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 19.5×cost $0.0001 and $0.0022 |
| Count orders by status | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 4.9×took 0.3 s and 1.3 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 31.5×cost $0.0001 and $0.0021 |
| Revenue by category | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 7.3×took 0.4 s and 3.0 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 21.4×cost $0.0002 and $0.0032 |
| Every customer, even those without orders | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 5.5×took 1.9 s and 10.3 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 19.1×cost $0.0004 and $0.0072 |
| Monthly revenue with a running total | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 20.1×took 0.7 s and 14.3 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 30.9×cost $0.0003 and $0.0093 |
| A fact from one section | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 5.5×took 0.3 s and 1.6 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 15.5×cost $0.0002 and $0.0026 |
| Core hours and start times | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 5.7×took 0.3 s and 1.9 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 21.4×cost $0.0001 and $0.0028 |
| Two sections in one answer | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 5.8×took 0.3 s and 2.0 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 21.9×cost $0.0001 and $0.0029 |
| A later amendment changes the answer | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 4.4×took 1.0 s and 4.4 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 13.2×cost $0.0003 and $0.0037 |
| A question the handbook doesn't answer | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 4.5×took 0.4 s and 1.9 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 20.6×cost $0.0001 and $0.0026 |
| Pick the tool and work out the date | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 15.3×took 0.3 s and 5.2 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 15.2×cost $0.0001 and $0.0023 |
| Convert a currency | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 6.8×took 0.3 s and 1.9 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 19.6×cost $0.0001 and $0.0024 |
| Book a meeting from a sentence | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 22.7×took 0.6 s and 14.7 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 27.4×cost $0.0003 and $0.0085 |
| Search, but don't book | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 9.7×took 0.4 s and 3.4 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 12.9×cost $0.0002 and $0.0023 |
| Two calls with a unit conversion | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 8.3×took 0.6 s and 5.2 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 16.3×cost $0.0003 and $0.0043 |
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Grok 4.7 in our test runs
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Grok 4.7 on the same prompts, job by job: how many replies passed their check.
Based on 100 of our test runs on , through OpenRouter with the app's own prompt and settings. Updated .
| Job | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Coding | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Writing | 4 of 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Math | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Summarization | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Data analysis | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Customer support | 4 of 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Translation | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| SQL | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| RAG and answering from documents | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Agents and tool use | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| All jobs | 48 of 50 · 1 message each · $0.0005 a reply | 47 of 50 · 1 message each · $0.0077 a reply |
The same prompts, sent to both through llmwise's own pipeline and checked the same way: five for each job. A bold count is the one that passed more. Messages: what each reply counted as on Pro. Cost: what OpenRouter charged us per reply, on average. Every prompt, and how it's scored.
Where they differed most, writing: both replies to a prompt only one of them passed.
A hard prompt: “Argue both sides of free buses”, in full.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Passed: Graded 4.3 of 5 on average (lowest 4).
Free buses make a city fairer and faster. Fares cost more to collect than they raise, so abolishing them saves money while filling seats. Riders who now drive will switch, cutting congestion, emissions, and parking demand. Low-income workers gain access to jobs; students and elderly riders gain independence. Downtown shops gain customers. A city that moves everyone freely is safer, cleaner, and more equal. The bus becomes public infrastructure, like a sidewalk — not a toll road. Free buses are not free; someone pays. Subsidies come from taxes, pulling money from schools, housing, or health. Packed buses with no revenue still need more vehicles and drivers, so service quality falls. Riders who can afford fares — most of them — get a subsidy they don't need, while the poorest may see worse, slower service. Free transit also mostly serves existing riders rather than luring drivers out of cars. Better to fund frequent, reliable buses and discount fares for those who need help.
423 tokens in, 859 out (655 of them reasoning) · 2.6 s · $0.0011 · 1 message on Pro · answered by deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash via Together ·
Grok 4.7
Failed: Graded 4.7 of 5 on average (lowest 4); but a paragraph of 100 words, over the 90 allowed.
A city should make its buses free because fare collection costs money, slows boarding, and keeps poorer riders off the system. Zero fares would cut those overheads, fill empty seats, and turn transit into a genuine public service rather than a paywall. Riders who switch from cars would ease congestion and pollution, while workers, students, and elderly residents would gain reliable mobility without budgeting for every trip. The social return—fewer missed shifts, wider access to jobs and clinics, a more livable street—outweighs the lost ticket revenue if the city funds the gap from parking fees or a modest local tax. Free buses fail when they are treated as a gift rather than a service that must still run on time. Without fares, demand surges while revenue collapses, so agencies cut frequency, defer maintenance, and pack vehicles until riding becomes slower and less safe than driving. Crowding and disorder drive away the very commuters whose fares once subsidized off-peak routes, and taxpayers who never ride absorb a growing bill with no accountability for performance. A cheap fare, paired with faster boarding and more buses, keeps the system solvent and trustworthy; abolishing the price does not create capacity, and a free bus that does not come is worthless.
1,619 tokens in, 307 out (54 of them reasoning) · 6.0 s · $0.0034 · 1 message on Pro · answered by x-ai/grok-4.7 via xAI ·
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Grok 4.7 on every plan
Whether the one-time free trial reaches each model, then each paid plan's messages on it.
| Plan | Price | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | Not in the trial | Not in the trial |
| Plus | $10 a month | 30 a day | Up to 125 a month |
| Pro | $20 a month | 60 a day | Up to 250 a month |
| Max | $50 a month | 120 a day | Up to 800 a month |
| Ultra | $100 a month | 200 a day | Up to 1,800 a month |
| Studio | $200 a month | 200 a day | Up to 4,000 a month |
Prices don't include tax, which is added where it applies and shown before you pay. A paid plan's month is one allowance shared by every model, so each monthly count is the most you get if all of it goes to that model. It renews each billing period; everyday models refill daily at 00:00 UTC. Long chats count more per reply. How pricing works.
Every limit is published. Paid plans also have a monthly fair-use limit on AI cost: Plus $3.75, Pro $7.50, Max $20, Ultra $42, Studio $85. Using every message on your plan at typical sizes stays under it; very large messages and heavy research use it faster. Every limit, explained.
What differs
Messages on Pro
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is an everyday model (60 messages a day on Pro); Grok 4.7 draws on the monthly allowance (up to 250 messages a month on Pro).
Context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash takes up to 1.05M tokens; Grok 4.7 up to 500K tokens. A chat in llmwise holds up to 200k tokens, which fits in either, so the difference shows only through each maker's own API.
Images and PDFs
Both read images. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash gets a PDF's text rather than the file itself.
On Free
Neither is in the free trial: both need a paid plan, from Plus.
Where messages go
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Served through OpenRouter, only by hosts that don't store or train on prompts. The maker's own endpoint is never asked. Grok 4.7: Served through OpenRouter by xAI alone, on an endpoint that doesn't store or train on prompts.
Fact by fact
| Fact | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1.05M tokens | 500K tokens |
| Reads images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Text only | Whole file |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| API price (October 2026) | $0.30 in / $1.20 out per million tokens | $2.00 in / $6.00 out per million tokens |
| A typical message at API prices (4,000 tokens in, 700 out) | $0.0020 | $0.0122 |
| A $10 top-up adds | Nothing: an everyday model's count is daily | 200 messages |
| Where a message goes | Served through OpenRouter, only by hosts that don't store or train on prompts. The maker's own endpoint is never asked. | Served through OpenRouter by xAI alone, on an endpoint that doesn't store or train on prompts. |
| If the provider fails | When one host is down, OpenRouter moves the request to another host that meets the same rules. | xAI is its only host, so there's no other host to move to: if xAI fails, send the message again or pick another model. |
| Anthropic's safety fallback | Doesn't apply | Doesn't apply |
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Grok 4.7?
From the facts above and our test runs: the rest is how their answers suit your work, which one chat can show you.
Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: its messages come from the daily count (60 messages a day on Pro), so they leave the monthly allowance for bigger models.
Pick Grok 4.7: it reads a PDF as the whole file, charts and scans included.
Each model's page, the families, and other pairs
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Grok 4.7 is one pair of models. The page below covers the whole families.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: price, limits and messages on every plan
- Grok 4.7: price, limits and messages on every plan
- Grok vs DeepSeek
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- GPT-6 Luna vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.7
- GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.7
- Claude Sonnet 5 vs Grok 4.7
- Every model-vs-model page
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is a DeepSeek model; Grok 4.7 is a Grok model.
Questions
Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Grok 4.7 cheaper in llmwise?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is an everyday model (60 messages a day on Pro); Grok 4.7 draws on the monthly allowance (up to 250 messages a month on Pro). Every paid plan's monthly allowance is shared by the models on it, so each count is the most you get if it all goes to that model.
Can I try DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Grok 4.7 for free?
Neither is in the free trial of 5 messages: both need a paid plan, from Plus.
Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Grok 4.7?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1.05M tokens, against 500K tokens. A chat in llmwise holds up to 200k tokens, which fits in either, so the difference shows only through each maker's own API.
Can I use DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Grok 4.7 in the same chat?
Yes. Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash for one message and Grok 4.7 for the next; the second sees the whole chat, including the first one's answer.
Which did better in your test runs, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Grok 4.7?
On the same 50 prompts, run on October 8, 2026, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash passed 48 and Grok 4.7 passed 47. The table on this page has each job, and every reply is published.
Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Kimi, GLM, and Mistral, in one chat.
See what a message costs before you send it. Free is 5 messages to try; sign in with an email link, no password or card.