DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Coding
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash for coding: our test runs
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ran our 5 coding prompts in llmwise, through the same pipeline your messages take. Here's every reply as it came, whether it passed, what it cost and what it counts as on Pro, next to the other models.
Based on 5 of our test runs on , through OpenRouter with the app's own prompt and settings. Updated .
Short answer
In our test runs on September 27, 2026, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash passed 5 of 5 of our coding prompts (both hard ones): tied 1st of 15 models. Each reply counted as 1 message on Pro, where it has 60 a day, and cost $0.0011 to run on average.
Prompt by prompt
Each of the 5 coding prompts, and how DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's reply did.
| Prompt | Result | Cost | Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turn a title into a URL slugEveryday | Passed: All 7 tests passed. | $0.0002 | 1.9 s |
| Parse a duration like “1h 30m”Everyday | Passed: All 10 tests passed. | $0.0008 | 7.8 s |
| Merge overlapping intervalsEveryday | Passed: All 7 tests passed. | $0.0001 | 1.5 s |
| Evaluate an arithmetic expression, no evalHard | Passed: All 15 tests passed. | $0.0028 | 10.4 s |
| Parse CSV with quoted fieldsHard | Passed: All 8 tests passed. | $0.0013 | 11.6 s |
Every coding reply from DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Turn a title into a URL slug
An everyday prompt: “Turn a title into a URL slug”, in full.
Passed: All 7 tests passed.
```javascript function slugify(title) { return String(title) .normalize("NFD") // decompose é -> e + ́ .replace(/[\u0300-\u036f]/g, "") // drop the combining marks .toLowerCase() .replace(/[^a-z0-9]+/g, "-") // runs of anything else -> one hyphen .replace(/^-+|-+$/g, ""); // trim hyphens } ``` Notes: - `NFD` + stripping U+0300–U+036F handles é, ñ, ü, and most Latin accents. (Letters like `ø` or `ß` have no decomposition and will become hyphens; tell me if you need those mapped too.) - The trim uses `^-+|-+$` rather than `^-|-$` so a leading/trailing run of hyphens is removed entirely.521 tokens in, 224 out (27 of them reasoning) · 1.9 s · $0.0002 · 1 message on Pro · answered by deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash via CoreWeave ·
Parse a duration like “1h 30m”
An everyday prompt: “Parse a duration like “1h 30m””, in full.
Passed: All 10 tests passed.
```javascript function parseDuration(text) { if (typeof text !== "string") return null; const match = /^\s*(?:(\d+)h)?\s*(?:(\d+)m)?\s*(?:(\d+)s)?\s*$/.exec(text); if (!match) return null; const [, h, m, s] = match; // Reject empty / whitespace-only input (no part present). if (h === undefined && m === undefined && s === undefined) return null; return Number(h ?? 0) * 3600 + Number(m ?? 0) * 60 + Number(s ?? 0); } ```505 tokens in, 1,128 out (982 of them reasoning) · 7.8 s · $0.0008 · 1 message on Pro · answered by deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash via StreamLake ·
Merge overlapping intervals
An everyday prompt: “Merge overlapping intervals”, in full.
Passed: All 7 tests passed.
```javascript function mergeIntervals(intervals) { if (intervals.length === 0) return []; const sorted = intervals .map(([start, end]) => [start, end]) .sort((a, b) => a[0] - b[0] || a[1] - b[1]); const merged = [sorted[0]]; for (let i = 1; i < sorted.length; i++) { const [start, end] = sorted[i]; const last = merged[merged.length - 1]; if (start <= last[1]) { // overlapping or touching (start === last[1]) -> extend if (end > last[1]) last[1] = end; } else { merged.push([start, end]); } } return merged; } ```489 tokens in, 199 out (12 of them reasoning) · 1.5 s · $0.0001 · 1 message on Pro · answered by deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash via Wafer ·
Evaluate an arithmetic expression, no eval
A hard prompt: “Evaluate an arithmetic expression, no eval”, in full.
Passed: All 15 tests passed.
```javascript function evaluate(expression) { if (typeof expression !== 'string') { throw new Error('Expression must be a string'); } // ---- Tokenizer ---- const tokens = []; let i = 0; const isDigit = (c) => c >= '0' && c <= '9'; while (i < expression.length) { const ch = expression[i]; if (ch === ' ' || ch === '\t' || ch === '\n' || ch === '\r') { i++; continue; } if (isDigit(ch) || ch === '.') { const start = i; let dots = 0; while (i < expression.length && (isDigit(expression[i]) || expression[i] === '.')) { if (expression[i] === '.') dots++; i++; } const text = expression.slice(start, i); if (dots > 1 || text === '.') { throw new Error(`Invalid number '${text}'`); } tokens.push({ type: 'num', value: parseFloat(text) }); continue; } if ('+-*/^()'.includes(ch)) { tokens.push({ type: 'op', value: ch }); i++; continue; } throw new Error(`Invalid character '${ch}'`); } // ---- Parser (recursive descent) ---- // expr := term (('+' | '-') term)* // term := unary (('*' | '/') unary)* // unary := ('-' | '+') unary | power // power := primary ('^' unary)? // right-associative, tighter than unary minus // primary:= number | '(' expr ')' let pos = 0; const peek = () => tokens[pos]; function expr() { let value = term(); while (peek() && peek().type === 'op' && (peek().value === '+' || peek().value === '-')) { const op = tokens[pos++].value; const rhs = term(); value = op === '+' ? value + rhs : value - rhs; } return value; } function term() { let value = unary(); while (peek() && peek().type === 'op' && (peek().value === '*' || peek().value === '/')) { const op = tokens[pos++].value; const rhs = unary(); value = op === '*' ? value * rhs : value / rhs; } return value; } function unary() { const t = peek(); if (t && t.type === 'op' && t.value === '-') { pos++; return -unary(); } if (t && t.type === 'op' && t.value === '+') { pos++; return unary(); } return power(); } function power() { const base = primary(); if (peek() && peek().type === 'op' && peek().value === '^') { pos++; const exponent = unary(); // right-associative, allows unary minus after ^ return Math.pow(base, exponent); } return base; } function primary() { const t = peek(); if (!t) throw new Error('Unexpected end of expression'); if (t.type === 'num') { pos++; return t.value; } if (t.type === 'op' && t.value === '(') { pos++; const value = expr(); const closing = peek(); if (!closing || closing.type !== 'op' || closing.value !== ')') { throw new Error("Expected ')'"); } pos++; return value; } throw new Error(`Unexpected token '${t.value}'`); } const result = expr(); if (pos !== tokens.length) { throw new Error(`Unexpected token '${tokens[pos].value}'`); } return result; } ```591 tokens in, 2,216 out (1,331 of them reasoning) · 10.4 s · $0.0028 · 1 message on Pro · answered by deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash via Parasail ·
Parse CSV with quoted fields
A hard prompt: “Parse CSV with quoted fields”, in full.
Passed: All 8 tests passed.
```javascript function parseCsv(text) { if (text === '') return []; const rows = []; let row = []; let field = ''; let inQuotes = false; let atFieldStart = true; let i = 0; const n = text.length; const endField = () => { row.push(field); field = ''; atFieldStart = true; }; const endRow = () => { endField(); rows.push(row); row = []; }; while (i < n) { const ch = text[i]; if (inQuotes) { if (ch === '"') { if (text[i + 1] === '"') { field += '"'; i += 2; } else { inQuotes = false; i += 1; } } else { field += ch; i += 1; } continue; } if (ch === '"' && atFieldStart) { inQuotes = true; atFieldStart = false; i += 1; continue; } if (ch === ',') { endField(); i += 1; continue; } if (ch === '\r' && text[i + 1] === '\n') { endRow(); i += 2; continue; } if (ch === '\n') { endRow(); i += 1; continue; } field += ch; atFieldStart = false; i += 1; } if (row.length > 0 || field !== '') { endRow(); } return rows; } ```522 tokens in, 1,914 out (1,537 of them reasoning) · 11.6 s · $0.0013 · 1 message on Pro · answered by deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash via StreamLake ·
How it compares on coding
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash beside the job's picks among every model. 13 models share the hard-problems pick, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash among them.
| Model | Passed | On Pro | Cost per reply |
|---|---|---|---|
| GLM 5.3Our pick: hard problems (shared), best value | 5 of 5 | 250 a month on Pro | $0.0015 |
| GLM 5.3 FlashOur pick: hard problems (shared), everyday | 5 of 5 | 60 a day on Pro | $0.0003 |
| DeepSeek V4.1 FlashOur pick: hard problems (shared) | 5 of 5 | 60 a day on Pro | $0.0011 |
Every limit is published. Paid plans also have a monthly fair-use limit on AI cost: Pro $7.50, Max $20, Ultra $42, Studio $85. Using every message on your plan at typical sizes stays under it; very large messages and heavy research use it faster. Every limit, explained.
How these runs were done
Tests. Automatic. The function runs against the prompt's tests in a separate Node.js process with a time limit and no file, network or child-process access; it passes when every test passes.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, and coding, elsewhere
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: price, limits and messages on every plan
- The best AI for coding: our picks among every model
- DeepSeek for coding
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash for writing: our test runs
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash for math: our test runs
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash for data analysis: our test runs
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- GPT-6 Luna vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Analyze a CSV with code: the prompt, and its price
- Our test runs: 50 prompts on every model
Questions
Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash good for coding?
In our test runs it passed 5 of 5 coding prompts, tied 1st of the 15 models in llmwise. Every reply is on this page, so you can judge them yourself.
How many of my messages does a coding reply from DeepSeek V4.1 Flash use?
1 message each on Pro, where it has 60 a day on Pro. The price of a message is fixed and shown before you send it, however long the reply.
How were these runs done?
The same way for every model: each prompt sent through llmwise's own pipeline, each reply checked the same way. The methods page has every prompt and how each is scored.
Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Kimi, and GLM, in one chat.
See what a message costs before you send it. Free is 5 messages to try; sign in with an email link, no password or card.