Model vs model
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash are both in llmwise. What each gets on every plan, what it reads, how it's served and what happens when its provider fails, from the catalog and the code that runs them.
Model prices and specs checked against OpenRouter's Claude Haiku 4.5 page, OpenRouter's DeepSeek V4.1 Flash page. Updated .
Short answer
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is an everyday model (60 messages a day on Pro); Claude Haiku 4.5 draws on the monthly allowance (up to 250 messages a month on Pro). Otherwise, only Claude Haiku 4.5 reads a PDF as the whole file. In our test runs, Claude Haiku 4.5 passed 43 of the 50 prompts both answered and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 49; 8 prompts split them, most on coding (3 to 5).
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, prompt by prompt
Every prompt Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash both answered, compared directly, their biggest differences first. One run each, through OpenRouter: a wait depends on the provider and the load that day, so a lead under 10% counts as close.
Of the 50 prompts both answered, both passed 42, only Claude Haiku 4.5 passed 1, only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash passed 7, and neither passed 0. Claude Haiku 4.5 answered sooner on 26 of the 50 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on 15; the rest were within 10% of each other. The 50 replies cost $0.0741 on Claude Haiku 4.5 and $0.0172 on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 4.3× less on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash.
The 8 prompts only one of Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash passed
Evaluate an arithmetic expression, no eval (coding): DeepSeek V4.1 Flash passed and Claude Haiku 4.5 didn't. Claude Haiku 4.5: 14 of 15 tests passed. First failure: evaluate("-2 ^ 2"): Expected values to be strictly deep-equal: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: All 15 tests passed.
Parse CSV with quoted fields (coding): DeepSeek V4.1 Flash passed and Claude Haiku 4.5 didn't. Claude Haiku 4.5: 5 of 8 tests passed. First failure: parseCsv('"line1\nline2",end\r\nnext,row\r\n'): Expected values to be strictly deep-equal: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: All 8 tests passed.
Rewrite corporate jargon in plain words (writing): Claude Haiku 4.5 passed and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash didn't. Claude Haiku 4.5: Graded 4.3 of 5 on average (lowest 4). DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Graded 3.7 of 5 on average (lowest 3).
A product announcement with five rules (writing): DeepSeek V4.1 Flash passed and Claude Haiku 4.5 didn't. Claude Haiku 4.5: Graded 3.7 of 5 on average (lowest 3). DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Graded 4.3 of 5 on average (lowest 4).
Average order value in August (data analysis): DeepSeek V4.1 Flash passed and Claude Haiku 4.5 didn't. Claude Haiku 4.5: Final answer 275.00; expected 300. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Final answer 300.00: right.
Correlation between ad spend and sign-ups (data analysis): DeepSeek V4.1 Flash passed and Claude Haiku 4.5 didn't. Claude Haiku 4.5: Final answer 0.99; expected 0.97. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Final answer 0.97: right.
A frustrated customer (customer support): DeepSeek V4.1 Flash passed and Claude Haiku 4.5 didn't. Claude Haiku 4.5: Graded 3.3 of 5 on average (lowest 3). DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Graded 4.7 of 5 on average (lowest 4).
A message with a planted instruction (customer support): DeepSeek V4.1 Flash passed and Claude Haiku 4.5 didn't. Claude Haiku 4.5: Graded 4.3 of 5 on average (lowest 3); but 165 words, over the 150 allowed. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Graded 4.7 of 5 on average (lowest 4).
Job by job, the widest gaps first
Customer support: Claude Haiku 4.5 passed 3 of 5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 5 of 5. Their median waits were close, 2.7 s against 2.5 s. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost 5.1× less, $0.0073 against $0.0014 for the 5 replies. Their replies ran to about the same length.
Data analysis: Claude Haiku 4.5 passed 3 of 5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 5 of 5. Their median waits were close, 2.7 s against 3.0 s. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost 4.9× less, $0.0125 against $0.0026 for the 5 replies. Claude Haiku 4.5's replies ran 103% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Coding: Claude Haiku 4.5 passed 3 of 5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 5 of 5. Claude Haiku 4.5 answered 3.3× sooner at the median, 2.3 s against 7.8 s. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost 2.5× less, $0.0137 against $0.0054 for the 5 replies. Claude Haiku 4.5's replies ran 24% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Math: Claude Haiku 4.5 passed 5 of 5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 5 of 5. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash answered 1.3× sooner at the median, 2.2 s against 1.7 s. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost 6.6× less, $0.0077 against $0.0012 for the 5 replies. Claude Haiku 4.5's replies ran 125% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Summarization: Claude Haiku 4.5 passed 5 of 5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 5 of 5. Their median waits were close, 1.7 s against 1.5 s. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost 6.1× less, $0.0051 against $0.0008 for the 5 replies. Their replies ran to about the same length.
SQL: Claude Haiku 4.5 passed 5 of 5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 5 of 5. Claude Haiku 4.5 answered 1.3× sooner at the median, 1.2 s against 1.7 s. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost 6.1× less, $0.0049 against $0.0008 for the 5 replies. Claude Haiku 4.5's replies ran 11% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Agents and tool use: Claude Haiku 4.5 passed 5 of 5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 5 of 5. Claude Haiku 4.5 answered 1.2× sooner at the median, 1.1 s against 1.4 s. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost 5.2× less, $0.0047 against $0.0009 for the 5 replies. Claude Haiku 4.5's replies ran 69% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Translation: Claude Haiku 4.5 passed 5 of 5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 5 of 5. Their median waits were close, 1.8 s against 1.8 s. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost 4.9× less, $0.0074 against $0.0015 for the 5 replies. Claude Haiku 4.5's replies ran 25% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
RAG and answering from documents: Claude Haiku 4.5 passed 5 of 5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 5 of 5. Their median waits were close, 1.2 s against 1.1 s. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost 4.4× less, $0.0050 against $0.0011 for the 5 replies. Claude Haiku 4.5's replies ran 11% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
Writing: Claude Haiku 4.5 passed 4 of 5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 4 of 5. Claude Haiku 4.5 answered 1.4× sooner at the median, 2.2 s against 3.1 s. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost 4.0× less, $0.0057 against $0.0014 for the 5 replies. Claude Haiku 4.5's replies ran 12% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.
All 50 prompts: who passed, who answered sooner, who cost less
| Prompt | Result | Sooner | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turn a title into a URL slug | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.2×took 1.5 s and 1.9 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 3.8×cost $0.0010 and $0.0002 |
| Parse a duration like “1h 30m” | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 3.3×took 2.3 s and 7.8 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 2.6×cost $0.0022 and $0.0008 |
| Merge overlapping intervals | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 1.3×took 2.0 s and 1.5 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 11.7×cost $0.0017 and $0.0001 |
| Evaluate an arithmetic expression, no eval | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.4×took 7.6 s and 10.4 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 2.0×cost $0.0056 and $0.0028 |
| Parse CSV with quoted fields | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Claude Haiku 4.5, 3.3×took 3.5 s and 11.6 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 2.5×cost $0.0033 and $0.0013 |
| Announce a second bakery shop on LinkedIn | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.1×took 2.6 s and 2.9 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 5.7×cost $0.0013 and $0.0002 |
| Rewrite corporate jargon in plain words | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 1.4×took 1.6 s and 1.2 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 2.8×cost $0.0008 and $0.0003 |
| Decline a meeting and offer two times | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.5×took 2.0 s and 3.1 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 4.0×cost $0.0010 and $0.0002 |
| A product announcement with five rules | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.8×took 2.2 s and 6.2 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 2.9×cost $0.0012 and $0.0004 |
| Argue both sides of free buses | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.1×took 3.4 s and 3.9 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 5.4×cost $0.0014 and $0.0003 |
| A discount, then sales tax | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 2.0×took 1.1 s and 0.6 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 3.6×cost $0.0007 and $0.0002 |
| Pens at 3 for $4 | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 11.9×took 2.2 s and 25.6 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 4.7×cost $0.0014 and $0.0003 |
| Compound interest over three years | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 2.4×took 3.5 s and 1.5 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 6.2×cost $0.0013 and $0.0002 |
| Four-digit numbers whose digits sum to 9 | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 1.7×took 2.9 s and 1.7 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 9.7×cost $0.0024 and $0.0002 |
| The highest of three dice is a 5 | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.1×took 2.2 s and 2.5 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 9.6×cost $0.0018 and $0.0002 |
| An article in three bullets | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.4×took 1.8 s and 2.5 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 3.6×cost $0.0011 and $0.0003 |
| An email thread in one sentence | Both passed | Closetook 1.3 s and 1.4 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 6.4×cost $0.0007 and $0.0001 |
| Decisions and action items from a meeting | Both passed | Closetook 1.7 s and 1.5 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 5.6×cost $0.0011 and $0.0002 |
| A quarterly memo for the CEO | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.1×took 1.5 s and 3.2 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 17.4×cost $0.0012 and $0.0001 |
| A study with a negative result | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 2.4×took 3.4 s and 1.4 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 6.3×cost $0.0010 and $0.0002 |
| The region with the most revenue | Both passed | Closetook 2.7 s and 3.0 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 6.0×cost $0.0026 and $0.0004 |
| Average order value in August | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Closetook 2.1 s and 2.0 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 8.0×cost $0.0023 and $0.0003 |
| Revenue change from July to August | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.4×took 4.2 s and 10.2 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 7.2×cost $0.0022 and $0.0003 |
| A median, filtered two ways | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 1.3×took 2.0 s and 1.6 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 6.6×cost $0.0016 and $0.0002 |
| Correlation between ad spend and sign-ups | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Closetook 5.0 s and 4.8 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 2.9×cost $0.0037 and $0.0013 |
| A late order | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.2×took 2.0 s and 2.5 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 3.8×cost $0.0014 and $0.0004 |
| A return inside the window | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.4×took 2.4 s and 3.3 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 5.9×cost $0.0013 and $0.0002 |
| A frustrated customer | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.3×took 3.0 s and 3.8 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 4.7×cost $0.0016 and $0.0003 |
| A refund request outside the window | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 1.2×took 2.7 s and 2.3 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 4.7×cost $0.0013 and $0.0003 |
| A message with a planted instruction | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 1.3×took 3.2 s and 2.4 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 7.0×cost $0.0018 and $0.0003 |
| A delivery message into Spanish | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 1.1×took 1.5 s and 1.3 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 5.6×cost $0.0011 and $0.0002 |
| A product description into French | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.2×took 1.4 s and 1.7 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 6.8×cost $0.0011 and $0.0002 |
| A meeting note into German | Both passed | Closetook 1.8 s and 1.8 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 6.9×cost $0.0010 and $0.0001 |
| Idioms into natural Japanese | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.1×took 3.3 s and 3.8 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 5.9×cost $0.0019 and $0.0003 |
| A lease clause into Brazilian Portuguese | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.1×took 3.5 s and 4.0 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 3.3×cost $0.0022 and $0.0007 |
| Customers in one country | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 1.1×took 1.1 s and 1.0 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 5.4×cost $0.0007 and $0.0001 |
| Count orders by status | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.2×took 0.8 s and 1.0 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 5.2×cost $0.0006 and $0.0001 |
| Revenue by category | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 2.3×took 1.2 s and 2.9 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 11.7×cost $0.0011 and $0.0001 |
| Every customer, even those without orders | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 1.3×took 2.1 s and 1.7 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 4.7×cost $0.0010 and $0.0002 |
| Monthly revenue with a running total | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.6×took 1.6 s and 2.6 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 6.0×cost $0.0016 and $0.0003 |
| A fact from one section | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 1.2×took 1.1 s and 0.9 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 6.0×cost $0.0009 and $0.0002 |
| Core hours and start times | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 1.1×took 1.1 s and 1.0 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 6.2×cost $0.0009 and $0.0001 |
| Two sections in one answer | Both passed | Closetook 1.3 s and 1.3 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 5.8×cost $0.0011 and $0.0002 |
| A later amendment changes the answer | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.7×took 1.9 s and 3.2 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 2.4×cost $0.0012 and $0.0005 |
| A question the handbook doesn't answer | Both passed | Closetook 1.2 s and 1.1 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 6.8×cost $0.0009 and $0.0001 |
| Pick the tool and work out the date | Both passed | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 1.2×took 1.1 s and 0.9 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 7.6×cost $0.0008 and $0.0001 |
| Convert a currency | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 8.8×took 1.0 s and 8.8 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 4.3×cost $0.0008 and $0.0002 |
| Book a meeting from a sentence | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.1×took 1.2 s and 1.4 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 4.6×cost $0.0010 and $0.0002 |
| Search, but don't book | Both passed | Closetook 1.1 s and 1.2 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 6.9×cost $0.0010 and $0.0001 |
| Two calls with a unit conversion | Both passed | Claude Haiku 4.5, 1.6×took 1.2 s and 2.0 s | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 4.4×cost $0.0011 and $0.0002 |
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash in our test runs
Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on the same prompts, job by job: how many replies passed their check.
Based on 100 of our test runs on , through OpenRouter with the app's own prompt and settings. Updated .
| Job | Claude Haiku 4.5 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Coding | 3 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Writing | 4 of 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Math | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Summarization | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Data analysis | 3 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Customer support | 3 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Translation | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| SQL | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| RAG and answering from documents | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Agents and tool use | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| All jobs | 43 of 50 · 1 message each · $0.0015 a reply | 49 of 50 · 1 message each · $0.0003 a reply |
The same prompts, sent to both through llmwise's own pipeline and checked the same way: five for each job. A bold count is the one that passed more. Messages: what each reply counted as on Pro. Cost: what OpenRouter charged us per reply, on average. Every prompt, and how it's scored.
Where they differed most, coding: both replies to a prompt only one of them passed.
A hard prompt: “Evaluate an arithmetic expression, no eval”, in full.
Claude Haiku 4.5
Failed: 14 of 15 tests passed. First failure: evaluate("-2 ^ 2"): Expected values to be strictly deep-equal:
```javascript function evaluate(expression) { const tokens = tokenize(expression); const parser = new Parser(tokens); const result = parser.parseExpression(); if (parser.pos !== tokens.length) { throw new Error("Unexpected tokens after expression"); } return result; } function tokenize(expression) { const tokens = []; let i = 0; while (i < expression.length) { const ch = expression[i]; if (/\s/.test(ch)) { i++; continue; } if (/\d/.test(ch)) { let num = ''; while (i < expression.length && /[\d.]/.test(expression[i])) { num += expression[i]; i++; } const parsed = parseFloat(num); if (isNaN(parsed)) { throw new Error(`Invalid number: ${num}`); } tokens.push({ type: 'NUMBER', value: parsed }); continue; } if ('+-*/^()'.includes(ch)) { tokens.push({ type: ch, value: ch }); i++; continue; } throw new Error(`Unexpected character: ${ch}`); } return tokens; } class Parser { constructor(tokens) { this.tokens = tokens; this.pos = 0; } peek() { return this.tokens[this.pos]; } consume() { return this.tokens[this.pos++]; } parseExpression() { return this.parseAddSub(); } parseAddSub() { let left = this.parseMulDiv(); while (this.peek() && (this.peek().type === '+' || this.peek().type === '-')) { const op = this.consume().type; const right = this.parseMulDiv(); left = op === '+' ? left + right : left - right; } return left; } parseMulDiv() { let left = this.parsePower(); while (this.peek() && (this.peek().type === '*' || this.peek().type === '/')) { const op = this.consume().type; const right = this.parsePower(); left = op === '*' ? left * right : left / right; } return left; } parsePower() { let left = this.parseUnary(); if (this.peek() && this.peek().type === '^') { this.consume(); const right = this.parsePower(); left = Math.pow(left, right); } return left; } parseUnary() { if (this.peek() && this.peek().type === '-') { this.consume(); return -this.parseUnary(); } if (this.peek() && this.peek().type === '+') { this.consume(); return this.parseUnary(); } return this.parsePrimary(); } parsePrimary() { const token = this.peek(); if (!token) { throw new Error("Unexpected end of expression"); } if (token.type === 'NUMBER') { this.consume(); return token.value; } if (token.type === '(') { this.consume(); const result = this.parseExpression(); if (!this.peek() || this.peek().type !== ')') { throw new Error("Missing closing parenthesis"); } this.consume(); return result; } throw new Error(`Unexpected token: ${token.value}`); } } ```599 tokens in, 1,007 out · 7.6 s · $0.0056 · 1 message on Pro · answered by anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 via Amazon Bedrock ·
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Passed: All 15 tests passed.
```javascript function evaluate(expression) { if (typeof expression !== 'string') { throw new Error('Expression must be a string'); } // ---- Tokenizer ---- const tokens = []; let i = 0; const isDigit = (c) => c >= '0' && c <= '9'; while (i < expression.length) { const ch = expression[i]; if (ch === ' ' || ch === '\t' || ch === '\n' || ch === '\r') { i++; continue; } if (isDigit(ch) || ch === '.') { const start = i; let dots = 0; while (i < expression.length && (isDigit(expression[i]) || expression[i] === '.')) { if (expression[i] === '.') dots++; i++; } const text = expression.slice(start, i); if (dots > 1 || text === '.') { throw new Error(`Invalid number '${text}'`); } tokens.push({ type: 'num', value: parseFloat(text) }); continue; } if ('+-*/^()'.includes(ch)) { tokens.push({ type: 'op', value: ch }); i++; continue; } throw new Error(`Invalid character '${ch}'`); } // ---- Parser (recursive descent) ---- // expr := term (('+' | '-') term)* // term := unary (('*' | '/') unary)* // unary := ('-' | '+') unary | power // power := primary ('^' unary)? // right-associative, tighter than unary minus // primary:= number | '(' expr ')' let pos = 0; const peek = () => tokens[pos]; function expr() { let value = term(); while (peek() && peek().type === 'op' && (peek().value === '+' || peek().value === '-')) { const op = tokens[pos++].value; const rhs = term(); value = op === '+' ? value + rhs : value - rhs; } return value; } function term() { let value = unary(); while (peek() && peek().type === 'op' && (peek().value === '*' || peek().value === '/')) { const op = tokens[pos++].value; const rhs = unary(); value = op === '*' ? value * rhs : value / rhs; } return value; } function unary() { const t = peek(); if (t && t.type === 'op' && t.value === '-') { pos++; return -unary(); } if (t && t.type === 'op' && t.value === '+') { pos++; return unary(); } return power(); } function power() { const base = primary(); if (peek() && peek().type === 'op' && peek().value === '^') { pos++; const exponent = unary(); // right-associative, allows unary minus after ^ return Math.pow(base, exponent); } return base; } function primary() { const t = peek(); if (!t) throw new Error('Unexpected end of expression'); if (t.type === 'num') { pos++; return t.value; } if (t.type === 'op' && t.value === '(') { pos++; const value = expr(); const closing = peek(); if (!closing || closing.type !== 'op' || closing.value !== ')') { throw new Error("Expected ')'"); } pos++; return value; } throw new Error(`Unexpected token '${t.value}'`); } const result = expr(); if (pos !== tokens.length) { throw new Error(`Unexpected token '${tokens[pos].value}'`); } return result; } ```591 tokens in, 2,216 out (1,331 of them reasoning) · 10.4 s · $0.0028 · 1 message on Pro · answered by deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash via Parasail ·
Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on every plan
Whether the one-time free trial reaches each model, then each paid plan's messages on it.
| Plan | Price | Claude Haiku 4.5 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | In the one-time trial of 5 messages | In the one-time trial of 5 messages |
| Pro | $20 a month | Up to 250 a month | 60 a day |
| Max | $50 a month | Up to 800 a month | 120 a day |
| Ultra | $100 a month | Up to 1,800 a month | 200 a day |
| Studio | $200 a month | Up to 4,000 a month | 200 a day |
Prices don't include tax, which is added where it applies and shown before you pay. A paid plan's month is one allowance shared by every model, so each monthly count is the most you get if all of it goes to that model. It renews each billing period; everyday models refill daily at 00:00 UTC. Long chats count more per reply. How pricing works.
Every limit is published. Paid plans also have a monthly fair-use limit on AI cost: Pro $7.50, Max $20, Ultra $42, Studio $85. Using every message on your plan at typical sizes stays under it; very large messages and heavy research use it faster. Every limit, explained.
What differs
Messages on Pro
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is an everyday model (60 messages a day on Pro); Claude Haiku 4.5 draws on the monthly allowance (up to 250 messages a month on Pro).
Context window
Claude Haiku 4.5 takes up to 200K tokens; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash up to 1.05M tokens. A chat in llmwise holds up to 200k tokens, which fits in either, so the difference shows only through each maker's own API.
Images and PDFs
Both read images. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash gets a PDF's text rather than the file itself.
On Free
Both are in the free trial.
Where messages go
Claude Haiku 4.5: Sent to Anthropic directly. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Served through OpenRouter, only by hosts that don't store or train on prompts. The maker's own endpoint is never asked.
Fact by fact
| Fact | Claude Haiku 4.5 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 200K tokens | 1.05M tokens |
| Reads images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Whole file | Text only |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| API price (September 2026) | $1.00 in / $5.00 out per million tokens | $0.17 in / $0.60 out per million tokens |
| A typical message at API prices (4,000 tokens in, 700 out) | $0.0075 | $0.0011 |
| A $10 top-up adds | 200 messages | Nothing: an everyday model's count is daily |
| Where a message goes | Sent to Anthropic directly. | Served through OpenRouter, only by hosts that don't store or train on prompts. The maker's own endpoint is never asked. |
| If the provider fails | If Anthropic fails before the reply starts (an overload, a server error, a dropped connection), llmwise sends the same request to Claude Haiku 4.5 through OpenRouter instead. | When one host is down, OpenRouter moves the request to another host that meets the same rules. |
| Anthropic's safety fallback | Doesn't apply | Doesn't apply |
Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?
From the facts above and our test runs: the rest is how their answers suit your work, which one chat can show you.
Pick Claude Haiku 4.5: it reads a PDF as the whole file, charts and scans included.
Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: its messages come from the daily count (60 messages a day on Pro), so they leave the monthly allowance for bigger models.
Each model's page, the families, and other pairs
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is one pair of models. The page below covers the whole families.
- Claude Haiku 4.5: price, limits and messages on every plan
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: price, limits and messages on every plan
- DeepSeek vs Claude
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Haiku 4.5
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Haiku 4.5
- Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Haiku 4.5
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- GPT-6 Luna vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
- Every model-vs-model page
Claude Haiku 4.5 is a Claude model; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is a DeepSeek model.
Questions
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cheaper in llmwise?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is an everyday model (60 messages a day on Pro); Claude Haiku 4.5 draws on the monthly allowance (up to 250 messages a month on Pro). Every paid plan's monthly allowance is shared by all models, so each count is the most you get if it all goes to that model.
Can I try Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash for free?
Yes: both are in the free trial of 5 messages.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1.05M tokens, against 200K tokens. A chat in llmwise holds up to 200k tokens, which fits in either, so the difference shows only through each maker's own API.
Can I use Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash in the same chat?
Yes. Pick Claude Haiku 4.5 for one message and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash for the next; the second sees the whole chat, including the first one's answer.
Which did better in your test runs, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?
On the same 50 prompts, run on September 27, 2026, Claude Haiku 4.5 passed 43 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash passed 49. The table on this page has each job, and every reply is published.
Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Kimi, and GLM, in one chat.
See what a message costs before you send it. Free is 5 messages to try; sign in with an email link, no password or card.