GPT-5.2vsGemini 3 FlashData Analysis

GPT-5.2 vs Gemini 3 Flash for Data Analysis

Which model is the better data analyst? We compare GPT-5.2 and Gemini 3 Flash on SQL generation, pattern recognition, statistical reasoning, and insight synthesis.

I want to try nowAll modelsOpen docs

You only pay credits per request. No monthly subscription. Paid credits never expire.

Replace multiple AI subscriptions with one wallet that includes routing, failover, and optimization.

First success in 60 seconds
Step 01Sign up in 10 secondsGet 40 free creditsStep 02Open your dashboardCreate API keyStep 03Send first requestRun a sample
Why teams start here first
No monthly subscription
Pay-as-you-go credits
Start with trial credits, then buy only what you consume.
Failover safety
Production-ready routing
Auto fallback across providers when latency, quality, or reliability changes.
Data control
Your policy, your choice
BYOK and zero-retention mode keep training and storage scope explicit.
Single API experience
One key, multi-provider access
Use Chat/Compare/Blend/Judge/Failover from one dashboard.
4
GPT-5.2
1
Tie
0
Gemini 3 Flash
Evidence snapshot

GPT-5.2 vs Gemini 3 Flash for data analysis

Task-specific scoring for data analysis workloads across 5 dimensions.

GPT-5.2 wins
4
data analysis dimensions
Gemini 3 Flash wins
0
data analysis dimensions
Dimensions tested
5
task-specific checks
Winner
GPT-5.2
for data analysis
Head-to-head for data analysis
DimensionGPT-5.2Gemini 3 FlashEdge
Pattern RecognitionStrong at identifying trends, correlations, and anomalies in structured data.Fast pattern detection. Good at spotting obvious trends but less thorough on subtle signals.
SQL & Query GenerationReliable SQL with complex JOINs, CTEs, and window functions. Clean formatting.Good SQL generation. Particularly strong with BigQuery syntax and Google Cloud data tools.tie
Statistical ReasoningCorrectly applies statistical tests and explains results in accessible language.Adequate for basic statistics. Less reliable on choosing the right test for a given scenario.
Data CleaningGenerates effective pandas code for cleaning. Good at handling common data quality issues.Fast at basic cleaning tasks. Less thorough on edge cases like mixed formats and encoding issues.
Insight SynthesisProduces clear, actionable summaries. Good at framing findings for business audiences.Quick summaries but can miss nuance. Better for initial exploratory overviews.

Which should you pick for data analysis?

AChoose GPT-5.2

Pick GPT-5.2 for thorough data analysis, statistical modeling, and producing polished reports for stakeholders.

BChoose Gemini 3 Flash

Pick Gemini 3 Flash for rapid exploratory analysis, BigQuery workflows, and quick data overviews where speed matters more than depth.

Verdict for data analysis

GPT-5.2 is the more capable data analyst with stronger pattern recognition, statistical reasoning, and insight synthesis. Gemini 3 Flash's speed and BigQuery integration make it a good choice for quick exploratory analysis in Google Cloud environments.

Use LLMWise Compare mode to test GPT-5.2 vs Gemini 3 Flash on your own data analysis prompts.

Common questions

Which AI is better for data analysis?
GPT-5.2 is the more capable data analyst overall. Gemini 3 Flash is faster for quick exploratory work and excels with Google Cloud data tools.
Can Gemini handle large datasets?
Gemini 3 Flash's 1M-token context window can process larger datasets in a single pass than GPT-5.2's 128K window.
Which generates better SQL?
Both generate reliable SQL. GPT-5.2 is stronger with PostgreSQL/MySQL while Gemini has an edge with BigQuery.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 or Gemini 3 Flash for data analysis?
Gemini 3 Flash is substantially cheaper per token. For exploratory data work where you run many queries iteratively, the cost difference adds up quickly. LLMWise shows real-time cost per request.
Does LLMWise support both GPT-5.2 and Gemini 3 Flash for data analysis?
Yes. LLMWise provides both models through a single API endpoint. You can use Gemini 3 Flash for fast exploratory queries and GPT-5.2 for polished stakeholder-ready reports without changing your integration.

One wallet, enterprise AI controls built in

You only pay credits per request. No monthly subscription. Paid credits never expire.

Replace multiple AI subscriptions with one wallet that includes routing, failover, and optimization.

Chat, Compare, Blend, Judge, MeshPolicy routing + replay labFailover without extra subscriptions
Start free with 40 creditsSee pricing examples
Related pages
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 3 Flash for Data AnalysisDeepSeek V3 vs GPT-5.2 for Data AnalysisClaude Sonnet 4.5 vs DeepSeek V3 for Data AnalysisGrok 3 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 for Data AnalysisBest LLM for Document SummarizationGPT-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 for Data Analysis