Skip to content

Image models compared

FLUX.2 Pro vs Qwen-Image 2.1: the same prompts, side by side

Black Forest Labs' FLUX.2 Pro and Alibaba's Qwen-Image 2.1 on the same 16 prompts, two for each of 8 jobs, from logos to YouTube thumbnails: each image as it was made, what the checks found, what it cost and how long it took.

Based on 32 images made on September 29, 2026 through kie.ai with llmwise's own settings for each model, each checked by Claude Sonnet 5.5. How the images are checked.

Short answer

On our 16 image test prompts, FLUX.2 Pro passed 14 and Qwen-Image 2.1 11, each image checked the same way. FLUX.2 Pro was quicker, 60.7 s an image against 79.9 s. In llmwise a FLUX.2 Pro image counts as 2 Claude Haiku 4.5 messages and a Qwen-Image 2.1 image as 1 Claude Haiku 4.5 message: up to 125 and 250 images a month on Pro.

FLUX.2 Pro and Qwen-Image 2.1 in llmwise

What llmwise asks FLUX.2 Pro and Qwen-Image 2.1 for, and what an image of each counts as.

FLUX.2 Pro and Qwen-Image 2.1 in llmwise
FactFLUX.2 ProQwen-Image 2.1
Made byBlack Forest LabsAlibaba
Made throughkie.aikie.ai
Output size1K1K
Aspect ratiossquare 1:1, portrait 2:3, landscape 3:2square 1:1, portrait 2:3, landscape 3:2
An image counts as2 Claude Haiku 4.5 messages1 Claude Haiku 4.5 message
Images on Proup to 125 a monthup to 250 a month

Job by job

FLUX.2 Pro passed 14 of 16 and Qwen-Image 2.1 11 of 16. A prompt passes when every piece of writing it asked for is there and every question about the image is a yes.

FLUX.2 Pro and Qwen-Image 2.1, job by job
JobFLUX.2 ProQwen-Image 2.1
Logos2 of 2 passed, 12 of 12 checks1 of 2 passed, 11 of 12 checks
Text in images2 of 2 passed, 14 of 14 checks2 of 2 passed, 14 of 14 checks
Product photos2 of 2 passed, 12 of 12 checks2 of 2 passed, 12 of 12 checks
Photorealistic images2 of 2 passed, 11 of 11 checks0 of 2 passed, 9 of 11 checks
Illustrations2 of 2 passed, 10 of 10 checks2 of 2 passed, 10 of 10 checks
Portraits1 of 2 passed, 12 of 13 checks2 of 2 passed, 13 of 13 checks
YouTube thumbnails2 of 2 passed, 12 of 12 checks1 of 2 passed, 11 of 12 checks
Social media posts1 of 2 passed, 11 of 12 checks1 of 2 passed, 11 of 12 checks

The same prompts, side by side

FLUX.2 Pro's and Qwen-Image 2.1's image for each prompt, with each question either one was answered no on; a prompt's title links to it in full, with every answer.

  1. A coffee shop logo with its name

    Both FLUX.2 Pro and Qwen-Image 2.1 passed; Qwen-Image 2.1's image came 4.6 s sooner (56.5 s to 61.1 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.005 less at kie.ai.

  2. A wheel and a wrench in one icon

    Only FLUX.2 Pro passed, not Qwen-Image 2.1; FLUX.2 Pro's image came 5.1 s sooner (48.6 s to 53.7 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.005 less at kie.ai.

    FLUX.2 ProPassed
    FLUX.2 Pro's image for “A wheel and a wrench in one icon”
      Qwen-Image 2.1Failed
      Qwen-Image 2.1's image for “A wheel and a wrench in one icon”
      • Is there a bicycle wheel in the icon? No: The icon is a plain circle with a short horizontal line, with no spokes, tire or hub, so it reads as a ring rather than a bicycle wheel.
    • A bakery sign with two lines

      Both FLUX.2 Pro and Qwen-Image 2.1 passed; FLUX.2 Pro's image came 12.9 s sooner (18.0 s to 30.9 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.005 less at kie.ai.

    • A café menu board with four prices

      Both FLUX.2 Pro and Qwen-Image 2.1 passed; FLUX.2 Pro's image came 64.5 s sooner (18.2 s to 82.7 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.005 less at kie.ai.

    • A white sneaker on a grey background

      Both FLUX.2 Pro and Qwen-Image 2.1 passed; FLUX.2 Pro's image came 113.3 s sooner (23.2 s to 136.5 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.005 less at kie.ai.

    • A perfume bottle and its reflection

      Both FLUX.2 Pro and Qwen-Image 2.1 passed; FLUX.2 Pro's image came 67.6 s sooner (23.4 s to 91.0 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.005 less at kie.ai.

    • A bowl of ramen from above

      Only FLUX.2 Pro passed, not Qwen-Image 2.1; FLUX.2 Pro's image came 52.9 s sooner (65.1 s to 118.0 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.005 less at kie.ai.

      FLUX.2 ProPassed
      FLUX.2 Pro's image for “A bowl of ramen from above”
        Qwen-Image 2.1Failed
        Qwen-Image 2.1's image for “A bowl of ramen from above”
        • Are chopsticks resting across the bowl? No: The chopsticks lie on the table and reach the bowl's lower left edge, but they do not rest across the bowl. They look more like they pass over or in front of the rim than rest on it.
      • A rainy street at night, one red umbrella

        Only FLUX.2 Pro passed, not Qwen-Image 2.1; FLUX.2 Pro's image came 113.4 s sooner (18.4 s to 131.7 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.005 less at kie.ai.

        FLUX.2 ProPassed
        FLUX.2 Pro's image for “A rainy street at night, one red umbrella”
          Qwen-Image 2.1Failed
          Qwen-Image 2.1's image for “A rainy street at night, one red umbrella”
          • Is the person walking away from the camera? No: The person is seen from the side or back and appears to be crossing or facing sideways, so it isn't clearly walking away from the camera.
        • A watercolour fox for a children's book

          Both FLUX.2 Pro and Qwen-Image 2.1 passed; FLUX.2 Pro's image came 53.1 s sooner (90.5 s to 143.6 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.005 less at kie.ai.

        • Three people at one laptop, flat vector

          Both FLUX.2 Pro and Qwen-Image 2.1 passed; Qwen-Image 2.1's image came 14.9 s sooner (104.6 s to 119.6 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.005 less at kie.ai.

        • A studio headshot

          Both FLUX.2 Pro and Qwen-Image 2.1 passed; FLUX.2 Pro's image came 83.9 s sooner (20.4 s to 104.3 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.005 less at kie.ai.

        • A fisherman holding a rope in both hands

          Only Qwen-Image 2.1 passed, not FLUX.2 Pro; both images took about as long, and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.005 less at kie.ai.

          FLUX.2 ProFailed
          FLUX.2 Pro's image for “A fisherman holding a rope in both hands”
          • Does every hand you can see have five fingers and look natural? No: The hands are clasped and partly hidden by the rope, so the fingers are hard to count and some look slightly merged or unclear.
          Qwen-Image 2.1Passed
          Qwen-Image 2.1's image for “A fisherman holding a rope in both hands”
          • A cooking video thumbnail

            Only FLUX.2 Pro passed, not Qwen-Image 2.1; Qwen-Image 2.1's image came 17.8 s sooner (43.4 s to 61.1 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.005 less at kie.ai.

            FLUX.2 ProPassed
            FLUX.2 Pro's image for “A cooking video thumbnail”
              Qwen-Image 2.1Failed
              Qwen-Image 2.1's image for “A cooking video thumbnail”
              • Are there flames coming from the pan? No: The flames are on the far left beside the man, not coming from the pan, which only holds food and flying bits.
            • A phone review thumbnail with a question

              Both FLUX.2 Pro and Qwen-Image 2.1 passed; FLUX.2 Pro's image came 12.7 s sooner (23.0 s to 35.7 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.005 less at kie.ai.

            • A summer sale post

              Both FLUX.2 Pro and Qwen-Image 2.1 passed; Qwen-Image 2.1's image came 151.3 s sooner (23.1 s to 174.4 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.005 less at kie.ai.

            • A book club announcement, top and bottom

              Neither FLUX.2 Pro nor Qwen-Image 2.1 passed; Qwen-Image 2.1's image came 84.6 s sooner (91.7 s to 176.2 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.005 less at kie.ai.

              FLUX.2 ProFailed
              FLUX.2 Pro's image for “A book club announcement, top and bottom”
              • Apart from those two lines, is nothing else written? No: The book's pages contain small lines of text and page numbers, so other writing appears in the image, though it is illegible.
              Qwen-Image 2.1Failed
              Qwen-Image 2.1's image for “A book club announcement, top and bottom”
              • Apart from those two lines, is nothing else written? No: The open book's pages show small blurry lines of text, so there is other writing, though it is unreadable.

            More image models, compared

            Questions

            Is FLUX.2 Pro better than Qwen-Image 2.1?

            On our 16 image test prompts, FLUX.2 Pro passed 14 and Qwen-Image 2.1 11, each image checked the same way. FLUX.2 Pro was quicker, 60.7 s an image against 79.9 s. In llmwise a FLUX.2 Pro image counts as 2 Claude Haiku 4.5 messages and a Qwen-Image 2.1 image as 1 Claude Haiku 4.5 message: up to 125 and 250 images a month on Pro.

            Which is cheaper in llmwise, FLUX.2 Pro or Qwen-Image 2.1?

            Qwen-Image 2.1: in llmwise its image counts as 1 Claude Haiku 4.5 message, against 2 Claude Haiku 4.5 messages for FLUX.2 Pro.

            Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Kimi, and GLM, in one chat.

            See what a message costs before you send it. Free is 5 messages to try; sign in with an email link, no password or card.