Skip to content

Image models compared

Qwen-Image 2.1 vs Seedream 5.0 Lite: the same prompts, side by side

Alibaba's Qwen-Image 2.1 and ByteDance's Seedream 5.0 Lite on the same 16 prompts, two for each of 8 jobs, from logos to YouTube thumbnails: each image as it was made, what the checks found, what it cost and how long it took.

Based on 32 images made on September 29, 2026 through kie.ai with llmwise's own settings for each model, each checked by Claude Sonnet 5.5. How the images are checked.

Short answer

On our 16 image test prompts, Seedream 5.0 Lite passed 14 and Qwen-Image 2.1 11, each image checked the same way. Seedream 5.0 Lite was quicker, 47.0 s an image against 79.9 s. In llmwise a Qwen-Image 2.1 image counts as 1 Claude Haiku 4.5 message and a Seedream 5.0 Lite image as 2 Claude Haiku 4.5 messages: up to 250 and 125 images a month on Pro.

Qwen-Image 2.1 and Seedream 5.0 Lite in llmwise

What llmwise asks Qwen-Image 2.1 and Seedream 5.0 Lite for, and what an image of each counts as.

Qwen-Image 2.1 and Seedream 5.0 Lite in llmwise
FactQwen-Image 2.1Seedream 5.0 Lite
Made byAlibabaByteDance
Made throughkie.aikie.ai
Output size1K2K
Aspect ratiossquare 1:1, portrait 2:3, landscape 3:2square 1:1, portrait 2:3, landscape 3:2
An image counts as1 Claude Haiku 4.5 message2 Claude Haiku 4.5 messages
Images on Proup to 250 a monthup to 125 a month

Job by job

Qwen-Image 2.1 passed 11 of 16 and Seedream 5.0 Lite 14 of 16. A prompt passes when every piece of writing it asked for is there and every question about the image is a yes.

Qwen-Image 2.1 and Seedream 5.0 Lite, job by job
JobQwen-Image 2.1Seedream 5.0 Lite
Logos1 of 2 passed, 11 of 12 checks2 of 2 passed, 12 of 12 checks
Text in images2 of 2 passed, 14 of 14 checks2 of 2 passed, 14 of 14 checks
Product photos2 of 2 passed, 12 of 12 checks2 of 2 passed, 12 of 12 checks
Photorealistic images0 of 2 passed, 9 of 11 checks2 of 2 passed, 11 of 11 checks
Illustrations2 of 2 passed, 10 of 10 checks2 of 2 passed, 10 of 10 checks
Portraits2 of 2 passed, 13 of 13 checks1 of 2 passed, 12 of 13 checks
YouTube thumbnails1 of 2 passed, 11 of 12 checks2 of 2 passed, 12 of 12 checks
Social media posts1 of 2 passed, 11 of 12 checks1 of 2 passed, 11 of 12 checks

The same prompts, side by side

Qwen-Image 2.1's and Seedream 5.0 Lite's image for each prompt, with each question either one was answered no on; a prompt's title links to it in full, with every answer.

  1. A coffee shop logo with its name

    Both Qwen-Image 2.1 and Seedream 5.0 Lite passed; Seedream 5.0 Lite's image came 10.4 s sooner (46.2 s to 56.5 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.007 less at kie.ai.

  2. A wheel and a wrench in one icon

    Only Seedream 5.0 Lite passed, not Qwen-Image 2.1; Seedream 5.0 Lite's image came 10.3 s sooner (43.4 s to 53.7 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.007 less at kie.ai.

    Qwen-Image 2.1Failed
    Qwen-Image 2.1's image for “A wheel and a wrench in one icon”
    • Is there a bicycle wheel in the icon? No: The icon is a plain circle with a short horizontal line, with no spokes, tire or hub, so it reads as a ring rather than a bicycle wheel.
    Seedream 5.0 LitePassed
    Seedream 5.0 Lite's image for “A wheel and a wrench in one icon”
    • A bakery sign with two lines

      Both Qwen-Image 2.1 and Seedream 5.0 Lite passed; Qwen-Image 2.1's image came 12.8 s sooner (30.9 s to 43.7 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.007 less at kie.ai.

    • A café menu board with four prices

      Both Qwen-Image 2.1 and Seedream 5.0 Lite passed; Seedream 5.0 Lite's image came 8.0 s sooner (74.6 s to 82.7 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.007 less at kie.ai.

    • A white sneaker on a grey background

      Both Qwen-Image 2.1 and Seedream 5.0 Lite passed; Seedream 5.0 Lite's image came 95.2 s sooner (41.2 s to 136.5 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.007 less at kie.ai.

    • A perfume bottle and its reflection

      Both Qwen-Image 2.1 and Seedream 5.0 Lite passed; Seedream 5.0 Lite's image came 49.1 s sooner (41.8 s to 91.0 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.007 less at kie.ai.

    • A bowl of ramen from above

      Only Seedream 5.0 Lite passed, not Qwen-Image 2.1; Seedream 5.0 Lite's image came 71.4 s sooner (46.6 s to 118.0 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.007 less at kie.ai.

      Qwen-Image 2.1Failed
      Qwen-Image 2.1's image for “A bowl of ramen from above”
      • Are chopsticks resting across the bowl? No: The chopsticks lie on the table and reach the bowl's lower left edge, but they do not rest across the bowl. They look more like they pass over or in front of the rim than rest on it.
      Seedream 5.0 LitePassed
      Seedream 5.0 Lite's image for “A bowl of ramen from above”
      • A rainy street at night, one red umbrella

        Only Seedream 5.0 Lite passed, not Qwen-Image 2.1; Seedream 5.0 Lite's image came 94.5 s sooner (37.2 s to 131.7 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.007 less at kie.ai.

        Qwen-Image 2.1Failed
        Qwen-Image 2.1's image for “A rainy street at night, one red umbrella”
        • Is the person walking away from the camera? No: The person is seen from the side or back and appears to be crossing or facing sideways, so it isn't clearly walking away from the camera.
        Seedream 5.0 LitePassed
        Seedream 5.0 Lite's image for “A rainy street at night, one red umbrella”
        • A watercolour fox for a children's book

          Both Qwen-Image 2.1 and Seedream 5.0 Lite passed; Seedream 5.0 Lite's image came 86.2 s sooner (57.4 s to 143.6 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.007 less at kie.ai.

        • Three people at one laptop, flat vector

          Both Qwen-Image 2.1 and Seedream 5.0 Lite passed; Seedream 5.0 Lite's image came 66.3 s sooner (38.4 s to 104.6 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.007 less at kie.ai.

        • A studio headshot

          Both Qwen-Image 2.1 and Seedream 5.0 Lite passed; Seedream 5.0 Lite's image came 63.6 s sooner (40.7 s to 104.3 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.007 less at kie.ai.

        • A fisherman holding a rope in both hands

          Only Qwen-Image 2.1 passed, not Seedream 5.0 Lite; Qwen-Image 2.1's image came 22.7 s sooner (30.8 s to 53.5 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.007 less at kie.ai.

          Qwen-Image 2.1Passed
          Qwen-Image 2.1's image for “A fisherman holding a rope in both hands”
            Seedream 5.0 LiteFailed
            Seedream 5.0 Lite's image for “A fisherman holding a rope in both hands”
            • Does every hand you can see have five fingers and look natural? No: The fingers are mostly hidden or wrapped around the rope, so five fingers on each hand cannot be confirmed.
          • A cooking video thumbnail

            Only Seedream 5.0 Lite passed, not Qwen-Image 2.1; Qwen-Image 2.1's image came 17.7 s sooner (43.4 s to 61.1 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.007 less at kie.ai.

            Qwen-Image 2.1Failed
            Qwen-Image 2.1's image for “A cooking video thumbnail”
            • Are there flames coming from the pan? No: The flames are on the far left beside the man, not coming from the pan, which only holds food and flying bits.
            Seedream 5.0 LitePassed
            Seedream 5.0 Lite's image for “A cooking video thumbnail”
            • A phone review thumbnail with a question

              Both Qwen-Image 2.1 and Seedream 5.0 Lite passed; Qwen-Image 2.1's image came 5.0 s sooner (35.7 s to 40.7 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.007 less at kie.ai.

            • A summer sale post

              Both Qwen-Image 2.1 and Seedream 5.0 Lite passed; Qwen-Image 2.1's image came 22.8 s sooner (23.1 s to 45.9 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.007 less at kie.ai.

            • A book club announcement, top and bottom

              Neither Qwen-Image 2.1 nor Seedream 5.0 Lite passed; Seedream 5.0 Lite's image came 52.9 s sooner (38.8 s to 91.7 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.007 less at kie.ai.

              Qwen-Image 2.1Failed
              Qwen-Image 2.1's image for “A book club announcement, top and bottom”
              • Apart from those two lines, is nothing else written? No: The open book's pages show small blurry lines of text, so there is other writing, though it is unreadable.
              Seedream 5.0 LiteFailed
              Seedream 5.0 Lite's image for “A book club announcement, top and bottom”
              • Apart from those two lines, is nothing else written? No: The book's pages show tiny, unreadable text-like marks, so the image contains more than those two lines.

            More image models, compared

            Questions

            Is Qwen-Image 2.1 better than Seedream 5.0 Lite?

            On our 16 image test prompts, Seedream 5.0 Lite passed 14 and Qwen-Image 2.1 11, each image checked the same way. Seedream 5.0 Lite was quicker, 47.0 s an image against 79.9 s. In llmwise a Qwen-Image 2.1 image counts as 1 Claude Haiku 4.5 message and a Seedream 5.0 Lite image as 2 Claude Haiku 4.5 messages: up to 250 and 125 images a month on Pro.

            Which is cheaper in llmwise, Qwen-Image 2.1 or Seedream 5.0 Lite?

            Qwen-Image 2.1: in llmwise its image counts as 1 Claude Haiku 4.5 message, against 2 Claude Haiku 4.5 messages for Seedream 5.0 Lite.

            Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Kimi, and GLM, in one chat.

            See what a message costs before you send it. Free is 5 messages to try; sign in with an email link, no password or card.