Image models compared
GPT Image 2.5 Flare vs Qwen-Image 2.1: the same prompts, side by side
OpenAI's GPT Image 2.5 Flare and Alibaba's Qwen-Image 2.1 on the same 16 prompts, two for each of 8 jobs, from logos to YouTube thumbnails: each image as it was made, what the checks found, what it cost and how long it took.
Based on 32 images made on September 29, 2026 through kie.ai with llmwise's own settings for each model, each checked by Claude Sonnet 5.5. How the images are checked.
Short answer
On our 16 image test prompts, GPT Image 2.5 Flare passed 13 and Qwen-Image 2.1 11, each image checked the same way. GPT Image 2.5 Flare was quicker, 67.4 s an image against 79.9 s. In llmwise a GPT Image 2.5 Flare image counts as 2 Claude Haiku 4.5 messages and a Qwen-Image 2.1 image as 1 Claude Haiku 4.5 message: up to 125 and 250 images a month on Pro.
GPT Image 2.5 Flare and Qwen-Image 2.1 in llmwise
What llmwise asks GPT Image 2.5 Flare and Qwen-Image 2.1 for, and what an image of each counts as.
| Fact | GPT Image 2.5 Flare | Qwen-Image 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Made by | OpenAI | Alibaba |
| Made through | kie.ai | kie.ai |
| Output size | 1K | 1K |
| Aspect ratios | square 1:1, portrait 2:3, landscape 3:2 | square 1:1, portrait 2:3, landscape 3:2 |
| An image counts as | 2 Claude Haiku 4.5 messages | 1 Claude Haiku 4.5 message |
| Images on Pro | up to 125 a month | up to 250 a month |
Job by job
GPT Image 2.5 Flare passed 13 of 16 and Qwen-Image 2.1 11 of 16. A prompt passes when every piece of writing it asked for is there and every question about the image is a yes.
| Job | GPT Image 2.5 Flare | Qwen-Image 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Logos | 2 of 2 passed, 12 of 12 checks | 1 of 2 passed, 11 of 12 checks |
| Text in images | 2 of 2 passed, 14 of 14 checks | 2 of 2 passed, 14 of 14 checks |
| Product photos | 2 of 2 passed, 12 of 12 checks | 2 of 2 passed, 12 of 12 checks |
| Photorealistic images | 2 of 2 passed, 11 of 11 checks | 0 of 2 passed, 9 of 11 checks |
| Illustrations | 2 of 2 passed, 10 of 10 checks | 2 of 2 passed, 10 of 10 checks |
| Portraits | 1 of 2 passed, 12 of 13 checks | 2 of 2 passed, 13 of 13 checks |
| YouTube thumbnails | 1 of 2 passed, 11 of 12 checks | 1 of 2 passed, 11 of 12 checks |
| Social media posts | 1 of 2 passed, 10 of 12 checks | 1 of 2 passed, 11 of 12 checks |
The same prompts, side by side
GPT Image 2.5 Flare's and Qwen-Image 2.1's image for each prompt, with each question either one was answered no on; a prompt's title links to it in full, with every answer.
A coffee shop logo with its name
Both GPT Image 2.5 Flare and Qwen-Image 2.1 passed; Qwen-Image 2.1's image came 2.4 s sooner (56.5 s to 58.9 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.010 less at kie.ai.
GPT Image 2.5 FlarePassed 
Qwen-Image 2.1Passed 
A wheel and a wrench in one icon
Only GPT Image 2.5 Flare passed, not Qwen-Image 2.1; Qwen-Image 2.1's image came 2.4 s sooner (53.7 s to 56.1 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.010 less at kie.ai.
GPT Image 2.5 FlarePassed 
Qwen-Image 2.1Failed 
- Is there a bicycle wheel in the icon? No: The icon is a plain circle with a short horizontal line, with no spokes, tire or hub, so it reads as a ring rather than a bicycle wheel.
A bakery sign with two lines
Both GPT Image 2.5 Flare and Qwen-Image 2.1 passed; Qwen-Image 2.1's image came 27.9 s sooner (30.9 s to 58.8 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.010 less at kie.ai.
GPT Image 2.5 FlarePassed 
Qwen-Image 2.1Passed 
A café menu board with four prices
Both GPT Image 2.5 Flare and Qwen-Image 2.1 passed; GPT Image 2.5 Flare's image came 23.2 s sooner (59.5 s to 82.7 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.010 less at kie.ai.
GPT Image 2.5 FlarePassed 
Qwen-Image 2.1Passed 
A white sneaker on a grey background
Both GPT Image 2.5 Flare and Qwen-Image 2.1 passed; GPT Image 2.5 Flare's image came 79.4 s sooner (57.0 s to 136.5 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.010 less at kie.ai.
GPT Image 2.5 FlarePassed 
Qwen-Image 2.1Passed 
A perfume bottle and its reflection
Both GPT Image 2.5 Flare and Qwen-Image 2.1 passed; GPT Image 2.5 Flare's image came 29.2 s sooner (61.8 s to 91.0 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.010 less at kie.ai.
GPT Image 2.5 FlarePassed 
Qwen-Image 2.1Passed 
A bowl of ramen from above
Only GPT Image 2.5 Flare passed, not Qwen-Image 2.1; GPT Image 2.5 Flare's image came 3.4 s sooner (114.6 s to 118.0 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.010 less at kie.ai.
GPT Image 2.5 FlarePassed 
Qwen-Image 2.1Failed 
- Are chopsticks resting across the bowl? No: The chopsticks lie on the table and reach the bowl's lower left edge, but they do not rest across the bowl. They look more like they pass over or in front of the rim than rest on it.
A rainy street at night, one red umbrella
Only GPT Image 2.5 Flare passed, not Qwen-Image 2.1; GPT Image 2.5 Flare's image came 66.3 s sooner (65.4 s to 131.7 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.010 less at kie.ai.
GPT Image 2.5 FlarePassed 
Qwen-Image 2.1Failed 
- Is the person walking away from the camera? No: The person is seen from the side or back and appears to be crossing or facing sideways, so it isn't clearly walking away from the camera.
A watercolour fox for a children's book
Both GPT Image 2.5 Flare and Qwen-Image 2.1 passed; GPT Image 2.5 Flare's image came 75.9 s sooner (67.6 s to 143.6 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.010 less at kie.ai.
GPT Image 2.5 FlarePassed 
Qwen-Image 2.1Passed 
Three people at one laptop, flat vector
Both GPT Image 2.5 Flare and Qwen-Image 2.1 passed; GPT Image 2.5 Flare's image came 37.5 s sooner (67.2 s to 104.6 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.010 less at kie.ai.
GPT Image 2.5 FlarePassed 
Qwen-Image 2.1Passed 
A studio headshot
Both GPT Image 2.5 Flare and Qwen-Image 2.1 passed; GPT Image 2.5 Flare's image came 45.5 s sooner (58.8 s to 104.3 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.010 less at kie.ai.
GPT Image 2.5 FlarePassed 
Qwen-Image 2.1Passed 
A fisherman holding a rope in both hands
Only Qwen-Image 2.1 passed, not GPT Image 2.5 Flare; Qwen-Image 2.1's image came 68.6 s sooner (30.8 s to 99.4 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.010 less at kie.ai.
GPT Image 2.5 FlareFailed 
- Does every hand you can see have five fingers and look natural? No: The fingers are partly hidden by the rope and jacket, so a clear count of five natural fingers on each hand isn't possible.
Qwen-Image 2.1Passed 
A cooking video thumbnail
Only GPT Image 2.5 Flare passed, not Qwen-Image 2.1; Qwen-Image 2.1's image came 23.0 s sooner (43.4 s to 66.3 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.010 less at kie.ai.
GPT Image 2.5 FlarePassed 
Qwen-Image 2.1Failed 
- Are there flames coming from the pan? No: The flames are on the far left beside the man, not coming from the pan, which only holds food and flying bits.
A phone review thumbnail with a question
Only Qwen-Image 2.1 passed, not GPT Image 2.5 Flare; Qwen-Image 2.1's image came 20.2 s sooner (35.7 s to 55.9 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.010 less at kie.ai.
GPT Image 2.5 FlareFailed 
- Is there only one piece of writing? No: The writing is on two separate lines, 'WORTH' and 'IT?', although they form one phrase.
Qwen-Image 2.1Passed 
A summer sale post
Both GPT Image 2.5 Flare and Qwen-Image 2.1 passed; Qwen-Image 2.1's image came 35.4 s sooner (23.1 s to 58.5 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.010 less at kie.ai.
GPT Image 2.5 FlarePassed 
Qwen-Image 2.1Passed 
A book club announcement, top and bottom
Neither GPT Image 2.5 Flare nor Qwen-Image 2.1 passed; GPT Image 2.5 Flare's image came 18.8 s sooner (72.9 s to 91.7 s), and Qwen-Image 2.1's cost $0.010 less at kie.ai.
GPT Image 2.5 FlareFailed 
- Is there one line of writing at the top and one at the bottom? No: The top has two lines of writing (BOOK and CLUB), not one, plus THURSDAY 7PM at the bottom.
- Apart from those two lines, is nothing else written? No: Besides the top and bottom text, the open book's pages have small print, though it is unreadable.
Qwen-Image 2.1Failed 
- Apart from those two lines, is nothing else written? No: The open book's pages show small blurry lines of text, so there is other writing, though it is unreadable.
More image models, compared
- FLUX.2 Pro vs GPT Image 2.5 Flare
- GPT Image 2.5 Flare vs Ideogram 3.0
- GPT Image 2.5 Flare vs Nano Banana 2
- GPT Image 2.5 Flare vs Nano Banana Pro
- GPT Image 2.5 Flare vs Seedream 5.0 Lite
- FLUX.2 Pro vs Qwen-Image 2.1
- Ideogram 3.0 vs Qwen-Image 2.1
- Nano Banana 2 vs Qwen-Image 2.1
- Nano Banana Pro vs Qwen-Image 2.1
- Qwen-Image 2.1 vs Seedream 5.0 Lite
Questions
Is GPT Image 2.5 Flare better than Qwen-Image 2.1?
On our 16 image test prompts, GPT Image 2.5 Flare passed 13 and Qwen-Image 2.1 11, each image checked the same way. GPT Image 2.5 Flare was quicker, 67.4 s an image against 79.9 s. In llmwise a GPT Image 2.5 Flare image counts as 2 Claude Haiku 4.5 messages and a Qwen-Image 2.1 image as 1 Claude Haiku 4.5 message: up to 125 and 250 images a month on Pro.
Which is cheaper in llmwise, GPT Image 2.5 Flare or Qwen-Image 2.1?
Qwen-Image 2.1: in llmwise its image counts as 1 Claude Haiku 4.5 message, against 2 Claude Haiku 4.5 messages for GPT Image 2.5 Flare.
Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Kimi, and GLM, in one chat.
See what a message costs before you send it. Free is 5 messages to try; sign in with an email link, no password or card.