Skip to content

Model vs model

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) vs GLM 5.3

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) and GLM 5.3 are both in llmwise. What each gets on every plan, what it reads, how it's served and what happens when its provider fails, from the catalog and the code that runs them.

Model prices and specs checked against OpenRouter's Gemini 3.1 Pro page, OpenRouter's GLM 5.3 page. Updated .

Short answer

GLM 5.3 gets twice as many messages: up to 250 messages a month on Pro, against up to 125 messages a month for Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview). Otherwise, only Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) reads images and only Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) reads a PDF as the whole file. In our test runs, Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) passed 49 of the 50 prompts both answered and GLM 5.3 48; one prompt split them, most on summarization (5 to 4).

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) vs GLM 5.3, prompt by prompt

Every prompt Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) and GLM 5.3 both answered, compared directly, their biggest differences first. One run each, through OpenRouter: a wait depends on the provider and the load that day, so a lead under 10% counts as close.

Of the 50 prompts both answered, both passed 48, only Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) passed 1, only GLM 5.3 passed 0, and neither passed 1. Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) answered sooner on 0 of the 50 and GLM 5.3 on 50; the rest were within 10% of each other. The 50 replies cost $0.5334 on Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) and $0.0364 on GLM 5.3: 14.7× less on GLM 5.3.

The prompt only one of Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) and GLM 5.3 passed

  • An article in three bullets (summarization): Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) passed and GLM 5.3 didn't. Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview): Graded 4.3 of 5 on average (lowest 4). GLM 5.3: Graded 4.3 of 5 on average (lowest 3); but 68 words, over the 60 allowed.

Job by job, the widest gaps first

  • Summarization: Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) passed 5 of 5 and GLM 5.3 4 of 5. GLM 5.3 answered 7.2× sooner at the median, 8.0 s against 1.1 s. GLM 5.3 cost 16.2× less, $0.0441 against $0.0027 for the 5 replies. GLM 5.3's replies ran 19% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.

  • Math: Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) passed 5 of 5 and GLM 5.3 5 of 5. GLM 5.3 answered 8.8× sooner at the median, 8.3 s against 0.9 s. GLM 5.3 cost 28.3× less, $0.0501 against $0.0018 for the 5 replies. Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview)'s replies ran 168% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.

  • SQL: Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) passed 5 of 5 and GLM 5.3 5 of 5. GLM 5.3 answered 6.4× sooner at the median, 7.4 s against 1.2 s. GLM 5.3 cost 24.5× less, $0.0386 against $0.0016 for the 5 replies. Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview)'s replies ran 13% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.

  • Customer support: Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) passed 5 of 5 and GLM 5.3 5 of 5. GLM 5.3 answered 3.8× sooner at the median, 8.7 s against 2.3 s. GLM 5.3 cost 22.7× less, $0.0529 against $0.0023 for the 5 replies. Their replies ran to about the same length.

  • Translation: Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) passed 5 of 5 and GLM 5.3 5 of 5. GLM 5.3 answered 6.5× sooner at the median, 10.3 s against 1.6 s. GLM 5.3 cost 20.0× less, $0.0699 against $0.0035 for the 5 replies. GLM 5.3's replies ran 55% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.

  • Writing: Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) passed 4 of 5 and GLM 5.3 4 of 5. GLM 5.3 answered 5.2× sooner at the median, 9.1 s against 1.8 s. GLM 5.3 cost 16.0× less, $0.0459 against $0.0029 for the 5 replies. Their replies ran to about the same length.

  • Coding: Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) passed 5 of 5 and GLM 5.3 5 of 5. GLM 5.3 answered 9.7× sooner at the median, 10.3 s against 1.1 s. GLM 5.3 cost 13.2× less, $0.0973 against $0.0073 for the 5 replies. Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview)'s replies ran 19% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.

  • Agents and tool use: Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) passed 5 of 5 and GLM 5.3 5 of 5. GLM 5.3 answered 6.0× sooner at the median, 5.3 s against 0.9 s. GLM 5.3 cost 12.8× less, $0.0284 against $0.0022 for the 5 replies. Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview)'s replies ran 77% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.

  • RAG and answering from documents: Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) passed 5 of 5 and GLM 5.3 5 of 5. GLM 5.3 answered 8.7× sooner at the median, 5.6 s against 0.6 s. GLM 5.3 cost 11.6× less, $0.0290 against $0.0025 for the 5 replies. GLM 5.3's replies ran 29% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.

  • Data analysis: Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) passed 5 of 5 and GLM 5.3 5 of 5. GLM 5.3 answered 4.5× sooner at the median, 8.6 s against 1.9 s. GLM 5.3 cost 8.1× less, $0.0773 against $0.0096 for the 5 replies. Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview)'s replies ran 124% longer, in tokens of reply, thinking not counted.

All 50 prompts: who passed, who answered sooner, who cost less
Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) and GLM 5.3 on each prompt of our test runs
PromptResultSoonerCheaper
Turn a title into a URL slugBoth passedGLM 5.3, 13.8×took 6.0 s and 0.4 sGLM 5.3, 5.5×cost $0.0056 and $0.0010
Parse a duration like “1h 30m”Both passedGLM 5.3, 9.7×took 10.3 s and 1.1 sGLM 5.3, 12.2×cost $0.0172 and $0.0014
Merge overlapping intervalsBoth passedGLM 5.3, 10.2×took 8.6 s and 0.8 sGLM 5.3, 12.6×cost $0.0103 and $0.0008
Evaluate an arithmetic expression, no evalBoth passedGLM 5.3, 1.6×took 20.6 s and 12.5 sGLM 5.3, 20.7×cost $0.0351 and $0.0017
Parse CSV with quoted fieldsBoth passedGLM 5.3, 7.8×took 20.6 s and 2.6 sGLM 5.3, 12.1×cost $0.0291 and $0.0024
Announce a second bakery shop on LinkedInBoth passedGLM 5.3, 3.3×took 9.5 s and 2.9 sGLM 5.3, 30.2×cost $0.0113 and $0.0004
Rewrite corporate jargon in plain wordsBoth passedGLM 5.3, 5.0×took 8.8 s and 1.8 sGLM 5.3, 49.8×cost $0.0101 and $0.0002
Decline a meeting and offer two timesBoth passedGLM 5.3, 4.3×took 6.2 s and 1.4 sGLM 5.3, 21.8×cost $0.0058 and $0.0003
A product announcement with five rulesBoth passedGLM 5.3, 10.8×took 9.2 s and 0.8 sGLM 5.3, 12.2×cost $0.0095 and $0.0008
Argue both sides of free busesNeither passedGLM 5.3, 5.2×took 9.1 s and 1.8 sGLM 5.3, 7.3×cost $0.0092 and $0.0013
A discount, then sales taxBoth passedGLM 5.3, 3.8×took 3.6 s and 0.9 sGLM 5.3, 20.7×cost $0.0042 and $0.0002
Pens at 3 for $4Both passedGLM 5.3, 6.5×took 9.6 s and 1.5 sGLM 5.3, 68.0×cost $0.0121 and $0.0002
Compound interest over three yearsBoth passedGLM 5.3, 10.7×took 6.2 s and 0.6 sGLM 5.3, 18.1×cost $0.0099 and $0.0005
Four-digit numbers whose digits sum to 9Both passedGLM 5.3, 5.2×took 9.6 s and 1.9 sGLM 5.3, 59.4×cost $0.0150 and $0.0003
The highest of three dice is a 5Both passedGLM 5.3, 9.6×took 8.3 s and 0.9 sGLM 5.3, 15.2×cost $0.0090 and $0.0006
An article in three bulletsOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview)GLM 5.3, 2.9×took 8.0 s and 2.8 sGLM 5.3, 19.7×cost $0.0088 and $0.0004
An email thread in one sentenceBoth passedGLM 5.3, 6.1×took 6.3 s and 1.0 sGLM 5.3, 24.9×cost $0.0058 and $0.0002
Decisions and action items from a meetingBoth passedGLM 5.3, 5.0×took 7.6 s and 1.5 sGLM 5.3, 34.5×cost $0.0081 and $0.0002
A quarterly memo for the CEOBoth passedGLM 5.3, 10.2×took 11.2 s and 1.1 sGLM 5.3, 14.1×cost $0.0139 and $0.0010
A study with a negative resultBoth passedGLM 5.3, 9.9×took 8.2 s and 0.8 sGLM 5.3, 9.1×cost $0.0075 and $0.0008
The region with the most revenueBoth passedGLM 5.3, 4.1×took 8.5 s and 2.1 sGLM 5.3, 29.8×cost $0.0117 and $0.0004
Average order value in AugustBoth passedGLM 5.3, 4.5×took 8.6 s and 1.9 sGLM 5.3, 35.6×cost $0.0130 and $0.0004
Revenue change from July to AugustBoth passedGLM 5.3, 6.5×took 9.0 s and 1.4 sGLM 5.3, 8.6×cost $0.0135 and $0.0016
A median, filtered two waysBoth passedGLM 5.3, 7.4×took 7.1 s and 1.0 sGLM 5.3, 7.7×cost $0.0082 and $0.0011
Correlation between ad spend and sign-upsBoth passedGLM 5.3, 3.0×took 16.5 s and 5.6 sGLM 5.3, 5.0×cost $0.0310 and $0.0062
A late orderBoth passedGLM 5.3, 3.3×took 8.7 s and 2.6 sGLM 5.3, 31.7×cost $0.0125 and $0.0004
A return inside the windowBoth passedGLM 5.3, 4.4×took 6.9 s and 1.6 sGLM 5.3, 32.4×cost $0.0076 and $0.0002
A frustrated customerBoth passedGLM 5.3, 4.2×took 9.8 s and 2.3 sGLM 5.3, 35.2×cost $0.0110 and $0.0003
A refund request outside the windowBoth passedGLM 5.3, 6.5×took 7.4 s and 1.1 sGLM 5.3, 11.2×cost $0.0103 and $0.0009
A message with a planted instructionBoth passedGLM 5.3, 2.0×took 10.6 s and 5.3 sGLM 5.3, 24.5×cost $0.0116 and $0.0005
A delivery message into SpanishBoth passedGLM 5.3, 7.9×took 11.8 s and 1.5 sGLM 5.3, 68.5×cost $0.0157 and $0.0002
A product description into FrenchBoth passedGLM 5.3, 6.2×took 9.1 s and 1.5 sGLM 5.3, 47.7×cost $0.0141 and $0.0003
A meeting note into GermanBoth passedGLM 5.3, 8.2×took 13.0 s and 1.6 sGLM 5.3, 85.4×cost $0.0158 and $0.0002
Idioms into natural JapaneseBoth passedGLM 5.3, 6.0×took 10.3 s and 1.7 sGLM 5.3, 10.1×cost $0.0118 and $0.0012
A lease clause into Brazilian PortugueseBoth passedGLM 5.3, 4.7×took 8.1 s and 1.7 sGLM 5.3, 7.7×cost $0.0125 and $0.0016
Customers in one countryBoth passedGLM 5.3, 6.2×took 4.9 s and 0.8 sGLM 5.3, 22.0×cost $0.0029 and $0.0001
Count orders by statusBoth passedGLM 5.3, 4.3×took 5.0 s and 1.2 sGLM 5.3, 29.9×cost $0.0039 and $0.0001
Revenue by categoryBoth passedGLM 5.3, 6.0×took 7.4 s and 1.2 sGLM 5.3, 35.8×cost $0.0074 and $0.0002
Every customer, even those without ordersBoth passedGLM 5.3, 8.1×took 7.9 s and 1.0 sGLM 5.3, 12.3×cost $0.0089 and $0.0007
Monthly revenue with a running totalBoth passedGLM 5.3, 3.4×took 11.1 s and 3.2 sGLM 5.3, 40.2×cost $0.0155 and $0.0004
A fact from one sectionBoth passedGLM 5.3, 6.1×took 5.3 s and 0.9 sGLM 5.3, 17.2×cost $0.0045 and $0.0003
Core hours and start timesBoth passedGLM 5.3, 11.6×took 5.8 s and 0.5 sGLM 5.3, 7.2×cost $0.0052 and $0.0007
Two sections in one answerBoth passedGLM 5.3, 11.1×took 5.6 s and 0.5 sGLM 5.3, 10.3×cost $0.0047 and $0.0005
A later amendment changes the answerBoth passedGLM 5.3, 6.7×took 8.6 s and 1.3 sGLM 5.3, 16.7×cost $0.0099 and $0.0006
A question the handbook doesn't answerBoth passedGLM 5.3, 8.7×took 5.6 s and 0.6 sGLM 5.3, 9.9×cost $0.0046 and $0.0005
Pick the tool and work out the dateBoth passedGLM 5.3, 4.8×took 4.3 s and 0.9 sGLM 5.3, 22.1×cost $0.0048 and $0.0002
Convert a currencyBoth passedGLM 5.3, 4.7×took 5.3 s and 1.1 sGLM 5.3, 31.8×cost $0.0044 and $0.0001
Book a meeting from a sentenceBoth passedGLM 5.3, 4.2×took 7.1 s and 1.7 sGLM 5.3, 12.2×cost $0.0068 and $0.0006
Search, but don't bookBoth passedGLM 5.3, 8.7×took 4.7 s and 0.5 sGLM 5.3, 11.2×cost $0.0061 and $0.0005
Two calls with a unit conversionBoth passedGLM 5.3, 9.8×took 6.9 s and 0.7 sGLM 5.3, 8.3×cost $0.0063 and $0.0008

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) vs GLM 5.3 in our test runs

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) and GLM 5.3 on the same prompts, job by job: how many replies passed their check.

Based on 100 of our test runs on , through OpenRouter with the app's own prompt and settings. Updated .

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) and GLM 5.3 in our test runs, job by job
JobGemini 3.1 Pro (preview)GLM 5.3
Coding5 of 55 of 5
Writing4 of 54 of 5
Math5 of 55 of 5
Summarization5 of 54 of 5
Data analysis5 of 55 of 5
Customer support5 of 55 of 5
Translation5 of 55 of 5
SQL5 of 55 of 5
RAG and answering from documents5 of 55 of 5
Agents and tool use5 of 55 of 5
All jobs49 of 50 · 1 message each · $0.0107 a reply48 of 50 · 1 message each · $0.0007 a reply

The same prompts, sent to both through llmwise's own pipeline and checked the same way: five for each job. A bold count is the one that passed more. Messages: what each reply counted as on Pro. Cost: what OpenRouter charged us per reply, on average. Every prompt, and how it's scored.

Where they differed most, summarization: both replies to a prompt only one of them passed.

An everyday prompt: “An article in three bullets”, in full.

  • Gemini 3.1 Pro

    Passed: Graded 4.3 of 5 on average (lowest 4).

    * Daily bike trips jumped to 2,300 and cyclist injuries dropped sharply.
    * Car traffic fell 14% with minor delays, while local business impacts were mixed.
    * The city council votes in November on spending €1.1 million to make the lanes permanent.

    560 tokens in, 636 out (577 of them reasoning) · 8.0 s · $0.0088 · 1 message on Pro · answered by google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview via Google ·

  • GLM 5.3

    Failed: Graded 4.3 of 5 on average (lowest 3); but 68 words, over the 60 allowed.

    - Aldmoor ended its six-month protected bike lane trial on Market Street; the council votes in November on making them permanent.
    - Daily bike trips rose from about 900 to 2,300, cyclist injuries fell from nine to two, and car traffic dropped 14%, though rush-hour drives got slightly longer.
    - Businesses are split (27 reported more customers, 19 fewer), and permanence would cost an extra €1.1 million beyond the €410,000 spent.

    539 tokens in, 218 out (118 of them reasoning) · 2.8 s · $0.0004 · 1 message on Pro · answered by z-ai/glm-5.3 via Morph ·

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) and GLM 5.3 on every plan

Whether the one-time free trial reaches each model, then each paid plan's messages on it.

Messages on Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) and GLM 5.3, plan by plan
PlanPriceGemini 3.1 Pro (preview)GLM 5.3
Free$0In the one-time trial of 5 messagesIn the one-time trial of 5 messages
Pro$20 a monthUp to 125 a monthUp to 250 a month
Max$50 a monthUp to 400 a monthUp to 800 a month
Ultra$100 a monthUp to 900 a monthUp to 1,800 a month
Studio$200 a monthUp to 2,000 a monthUp to 4,000 a month

Prices don't include tax, which is added where it applies and shown before you pay. A paid plan's month is one allowance shared by every model, so each monthly count is the most you get if all of it goes to that model. It renews each billing period; everyday models refill daily at 00:00 UTC. Long chats count more per reply. How pricing works.

Every limit is published. Paid plans also have a monthly fair-use limit on AI cost: Pro $7.50, Max $20, Ultra $42, Studio $85. Using every message on your plan at typical sizes stays under it; very large messages and heavy research use it faster. Every limit, explained.

What differs

  • Messages on Pro

    GLM 5.3 gets twice as many messages: up to 250 messages a month on Pro, against up to 125 messages a month for Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview).

  • Context window

    Both take up to 1.05M tokens of context. A chat in llmwise holds up to 200k tokens, which fits in either, so the difference shows only through each maker's own API.

  • Images and PDFs

    GLM 5.3 doesn't read images. GLM 5.3 gets a PDF's text rather than the file itself.

  • On Free

    Both are in the free trial.

  • Where messages go

    Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview): Sent to Google directly. GLM 5.3: Served through OpenRouter, only by hosts that don't store or train on prompts. The maker's own endpoint is never asked.

Fact by fact

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) and GLM 5.3, fact by fact
FactGemini 3.1 Pro (preview)GLM 5.3
Context window1.05M tokens1.05M tokens
Reads imagesYesNo
PDFsWhole fileText only
ReasoningYesYes
API price (September 2026)$2.00 in / $12.00 out per million tokens$1.40 in / $4.40 out per million tokens
A typical message at API prices (4,000 tokens in, 700 out)$0.0164$0.0087
A $10 top-up adds100 messages200 messages
Where a message goesSent to Google directly.Served through OpenRouter, only by hosts that don't store or train on prompts. The maker's own endpoint is never asked.
If the provider failsIf Google fails before the reply starts (an overload, a server error, a dropped connection), llmwise sends the same request to Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) through OpenRouter instead.When one host is down, OpenRouter moves the request to another host that meets the same rules.
Anthropic's safety fallbackDoesn't applyDoesn't apply
API prices are what our model catalog lists (Gemini: Google's list price; GLM: Z.ai's list price). In llmwise you pay per message, not per token: the counts above are what you get.

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) or GLM 5.3?

From the facts above and our test runs: the rest is how their answers suit your work, which one chat can show you.

  • Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview): it reads images; it reads a PDF as the whole file, charts and scans included.

  • Pick GLM 5.3: more messages for the money, up to 250 messages a month on Pro.

Each model's page, the families, and other pairs

Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) vs GLM 5.3 is one pair of models. The page below covers the whole families.

Questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) or GLM 5.3 cheaper in llmwise?

GLM 5.3 gets twice as many messages: up to 250 messages a month on Pro, against up to 125 messages a month for Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview). Every paid plan's monthly allowance is shared by all models, so each count is the most you get if it all goes to that model.

Can I try Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) and GLM 5.3 for free?

Yes: both are in the free trial of 5 messages.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) or GLM 5.3?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens. A chat in llmwise holds up to 200k tokens, which fits in either, so the difference shows only through each maker's own API.

Can I use Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) and GLM 5.3 in the same chat?

Yes. Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) for one message and GLM 5.3 for the next; the second sees the whole chat, including the first one's answer.

Which did better in your test runs, Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) or GLM 5.3?

On the same 50 prompts, run on September 27, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview) passed 49 and GLM 5.3 passed 48. The table on this page has each job, and every reply is published.

Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Kimi, and GLM, in one chat.

See what a message costs before you send it. Free is 5 messages to try; sign in with an email link, no password or card.