GPT-5.2vsGemini 3 FlashMath

GPT-5.2 vs Gemini 3 Flash for Math

How do OpenAI and Google's models compare on mathematical tasks? We test GPT-5.2 and Gemini 3 Flash on reasoning, algebra, statistics, and proofs.

I want to try nowAll modelsOpen docs

You only pay credits per request. No monthly subscription. Paid credits never expire.

Replace multiple AI subscriptions with one wallet that includes routing, failover, and optimization.

First success in 60 seconds
Step 01Sign up in 10 secondsGet 40 free creditsStep 02Open your dashboardCreate API keyStep 03Send first requestRun a sample
Why teams start here first
No monthly subscription
Pay-as-you-go credits
Start with trial credits, then buy only what you consume.
Failover safety
Production-ready routing
Auto fallback across providers when latency, quality, or reliability changes.
Data control
Your policy, your choice
BYOK and zero-retention mode keep training and storage scope explicit.
Single API experience
One key, multi-provider access
Use Chat/Compare/Blend/Judge/Failover from one dashboard.
4
GPT-5.2
1
Tie
0
Gemini 3 Flash
Evidence snapshot

GPT-5.2 vs Gemini 3 Flash for math

Task-specific scoring for math workloads across 5 dimensions.

GPT-5.2 wins
4
math dimensions
Gemini 3 Flash wins
0
math dimensions
Dimensions tested
5
task-specific checks
Winner
GPT-5.2
for math
Head-to-head for math
DimensionGPT-5.2Gemini 3 FlashEdge
Step-by-step ReasoningSolid multi-step reasoning with clear explanations. Reliable on undergraduate-level problems.Fast reasoning but sometimes skips steps. More prone to arithmetic errors on complex chains.
Symbolic MathHandles algebra and calculus competently. Good at symbolic simplification.Adequate on basic symbolic tasks but less reliable on complex integrals and series.
Word ProblemsAccurately extracts mathematical structure from natural language descriptions.Good at straightforward word problems. Struggles more with multi-constraint problems.
Statistical AnalysisCorrectly applies common tests and explains results clearly for non-technical audiences.Fast at basic statistical calculations. Google's training data gives it strong knowledge of statistical methods.tie
Proof ConstructionHandles basic proofs and induction. Struggles with more abstract constructions.Weaker at formal proofs. Better suited to computational math than theoretical work.

Which should you pick for math?

AChoose GPT-5.2

Pick GPT-5.2 for homework help, exam prep, formal proofs, and any math task requiring careful step-by-step reasoning.

BChoose Gemini 3 Flash

Pick Gemini 3 Flash for quick calculations, basic statistics, and math tasks where speed matters more than showing detailed work.

Verdict for math

GPT-5.2 is the stronger math model with more reliable reasoning, better symbolic manipulation, and stronger proof construction. Gemini 3 Flash's speed makes it useful for quick calculations but it trails GPT-5.2 on problems requiring careful multi-step work.

Use LLMWise Compare mode to test GPT-5.2 vs Gemini 3 Flash on your own math prompts.

Common questions

Is GPT-5.2 or Gemini better at math?
GPT-5.2 is the stronger math model overall, with more reliable reasoning and fewer arithmetic errors on complex problems.
Can Gemini 3 Flash do calculus?
Gemini 3 Flash handles basic calculus but is less reliable on complex integration and series than GPT-5.2 or Claude.
Which is better for statistics?
Both are competent at basic statistics. GPT-5.2 explains results more clearly while Gemini is faster for simple calculations.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 or Gemini 3 Flash for math tasks?
Gemini 3 Flash costs significantly less per token. For routine math calculations where speed matters more than detailed reasoning, it offers excellent value. LLMWise tracks costs per request so you can compare.
Does LLMWise support both GPT-5.2 and Gemini 3 Flash for math?
Yes. Both models are available through LLMWise's unified API. You can use Compare mode to send the same math problem to both and verify the answer, or route based on problem complexity.

One wallet, enterprise AI controls built in

You only pay credits per request. No monthly subscription. Paid credits never expire.

Replace multiple AI subscriptions with one wallet that includes routing, failover, and optimization.

Chat, Compare, Blend, Judge, MeshPolicy routing + replay labFailover without extra subscriptions
Start free with 40 creditsSee pricing examples
Related pages
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 3 Flash for MathDeepSeek V3 vs GPT-5.2 for MathClaude Sonnet 4.5 vs DeepSeek V3 for MathGrok 3 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 for MathBest LLM for Math and Mathematical ReasoningGPT-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 for Math