Claude Sonnet 4.5vsDeepSeek V3Math

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs DeepSeek V3 for Math

Which AI model handles mathematical reasoning better? A dimension-by-dimension comparison of step-by-step solutions, symbolic computation, and formal proofs.

You only pay credits per request. No monthly subscription. Paid credits never expire.

Replace multiple AI subscriptions with one wallet that includes routing, failover, and optimization.

Why teams start here first
No monthly subscription
Pay-as-you-go credits
Start with trial credits, then buy only what you consume.
Failover safety
Production-ready routing
Auto fallback across providers when latency, quality, or reliability changes.
Data control
Your policy, your choice
BYOK and zero-retention mode keep training and storage scope explicit.
Single API experience
One key, multi-provider access
Use Chat/Compare/Blend/Judge/Failover from one dashboard.
0
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2
Tie
3
DeepSeek V3
Evidence snapshot

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs DeepSeek V3 for math

Task-specific scoring for math workloads across 5 dimensions.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 wins
0
math dimensions
DeepSeek V3 wins
3
math dimensions
Dimensions tested
5
task-specific checks
Winner
DeepSeek V3
for math
Head-to-head for math
DimensionClaude Sonnet 4.5DeepSeek V3Edge
Step-by-step ReasoningClear, well-explained reasoning chains with each step justified. Rarely makes logical leaps.Concise, accurate step-by-step solutions with strong logical rigor. Adept at breaking down complex multi-step problems.
Symbolic MathHandles algebraic manipulation and calculus competently. Can struggle with deeply nested symbolic expressions.Excels at symbolic manipulation including integration, differentiation, and algebraic simplification with high accuracy.
Word ProblemsStrong at extracting mathematical structure from natural language. Careful to identify all constraints and edge cases.Translates word problems to mathematical formulations efficiently. Particularly strong with optimization and rate-based problems.
Statistical AnalysisThorough statistical reasoning with appropriate caveats about assumptions and limitations.Computes statistical measures accurately and efficiently. Slightly less thorough on assumption violations.tie
Proof ConstructionConstructs well-organized proofs with explicit justification at each step. Strong at proof by contradiction and induction.Produces rigorous proofs with efficient notation. Handles number theory and combinatorial proofs with particular strength.tie

Which should you pick for math?

AChoose Claude Sonnet 4.5

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 when you need detailed explanations of mathematical reasoning for educational purposes or when statistical methodology matters.

BChoose DeepSeek V3

Choose DeepSeek V3 for competitive math, homework, symbolic computation, or any high-volume math workflow where cost efficiency is important.

Verdict for math

DeepSeek V3 edges ahead for math tasks, offering stronger symbolic manipulation and faster problem solving at a fraction of Claude's cost. Claude Sonnet 4.5 remains solid when detailed explanations or statistical nuance are needed.

Use LLMWise Compare mode to test Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs DeepSeek V3 on your own math prompts.

Common questions

Is DeepSeek V3 better than Claude at math?
DeepSeek V3 generally outperforms Claude Sonnet 4.5 on symbolic math and word problems, especially considering its significant cost advantage.
Which model is better for statistics?
Both perform comparably on statistics, with Claude offering more thorough explanations and DeepSeek providing faster computations.
Can Claude handle advanced math proofs?
Yes, Claude Sonnet 4.5 constructs well-organized proofs, performing on par with DeepSeek in this area.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or DeepSeek V3 for math?
DeepSeek V3 costs a fraction of Claude per token while delivering equal or better math performance. For math-heavy workloads, the savings are dramatic. LLMWise tracks per-request costs in real time.
Does LLMWise support both Claude Sonnet 4.5 and DeepSeek V3 for math?
Yes. Both models are available through LLMWise's unified API. You can use Compare mode to send the same math problem to both and cross-verify solutions for maximum confidence.

One wallet, enterprise AI controls built in

You only pay credits per request. No monthly subscription. Paid credits never expire.

Replace multiple AI subscriptions with one wallet that includes routing, failover, and optimization.

Chat, Compare, Blend, Judge, MeshPolicy routing + replay labFailover without extra subscriptions